should HIV/ STI status of individuals be made available to the public

[Ol’Otis]

I'ma have to say yeah

 

[scarlxrd]

Nah

 

[Mr210]

Um no, why stop there why not all personal information then

One minutes idiots say there isn't enough privacy and other times there is too much

 

[Remote]

No.

 

[The BasedFather]

Should we know where the bullet is when we play Russian Roulette?

 

[IWunD3r]

Yep.
U got ppl burning other ppl purposely.
Put em on blast like sex offenders..ppl with sexual diseases, they sex is offensive to my health.

 

[scarlxrd]

Should we know where the bullet is when we play Russian Roulette?

Powerful.

Hold this rep

 

[Luck]

Yep...I'm sure there's other people with that pack they can fukk with. Why should everybody else be at risk? Not even just fukkin but fighting too, I've been bit in fights by bloody mouth ass nikkas and hand to go get tested for diseases

Only thing is there's no way to implement some shyt like this without it being archaic

 

[JackRoss]

I'm curious about the "no" responses, no bullshyt

 

[Fillerguy]

Support the invasion of privacy brehs

 

[mamba]

We know the names of pedos and other sex offenders when they move into a community.

Why can't we know who has HIV/AIDS, Genital Herpes, etc.?

 

[I love Latina women]

good and interestin' question

 

[DontDoIt]

yes

 

[RatherUnique]

There is such a thing as HIPAA. What doctor would violate that to publish a private medical condition to a public database? None.

If HIPAA hypothetically did not exist - most people who may be at risk for AIDS/HIV would simply be too afraid to get tested and published.

Which would bring the epidemic back to mid 80's crisis levels and undo all the progress in prevention and treating that has made.

Terrible idea.

 

[Ironman]

In a relationship that shyt damn sure better be accessible especially if they don't tell you but, at the same time that is someone’s personal information