Y'all would really rather women get multiple abortions, something that can lead to complications and more often than not is psychologically taxing than consider an option that prevents the child from getting here in the first place yet somehow I get hate for suggesting voluntary vasectomies or tubal ligation.
They already have pills that do that,theres nothing taxing about taking a tiny pill everyday is there
? Women have more viable options before and after sex,and less risk,but apparently you don't believe that may be an issue at all,and you think THIS law will be the one that causes women to be reckless....Women and men cant get no more reckless than they already are so lets switch things up,lets treat both parties like adult offenders,instead of treating one like a juvenile,and see if that side continues to be reckless....Also while throwing in the option for men to be upfront and be responsible.
This law completely makes everybody responsible because it would force people to think about this shyt before they have sex....You comparing pregnancy to a casino is part of the problem,but completely accurate in how women,but especially men think about sex...."Sure I could lose all my money,but i'm feeling lucky
"....But do you think if before walking into a casino there was a paper people could sign, saying that even if you lose all ya money, you will get it back at the end night....How many gamblers do you think would stop and make sure that's done before entering
?Before you answer keep in mind its established nobodys going to stop gambling on either side,men or women.
There really is no argument when it comes to this paper being signed before sex.
. Saves the taxpayers money and future citizens the headache of unplanned or unwanted children and perhaps a future society of mofos with higher IQs from loving nuclear families with a purpose.
