Should Men Be Allowed "Legal Abortion"?

[MeachTheMonster]

In fact, ANY medical complications via abortion would be paid by the man including an unlikely funeral.

Man signs paper and gives money.
Woman gives up her life.

Equality

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Same dudes who wanna quote single mother statistics, and talk about "the black family structure" wanna legalize being a deadbeat

This all day.

 

[Cynic]

I feel like once this will be legal, it will eventually ripple over to the US. Just wondering how long it will take since the US is so conservative. Or will Conservatives be more willing to allow this than allowing women access to abortions.

It won't. Women won't let this fly. Neither will politicians who are voted in by them.

This would also make women more selective of who they let raw dog 'em

 

[Poitier]

No the fukk it wouldn't

Women already have this choice, and they still choose to bring the child into the world.

No, a lot of women don't go with abortion for the reasons this law eliminates.

 

[Ashley Banks]

Don't have kids out of wedlock. Simple as that.

I clearly said men that get women pregnant on purpose you know like poke holes in condoms or take the comdom off.

 

[MF budz]

Why don't you just have sex with ppl you wouldn't mind having a child with or wear a fukking condom. Sex causes babies who would've thought.

 

[Blackout]

Good law that will go against irresponsible behavior among women but the man should pay for the abortion and a bit more for letting it get that far irresponsibly so immature men can be checked too.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Thats the thing. If they are responsible, they won't be the ones abusing this en masse. It literally becomes a "choose better" economy overnight. It becomes even more important for a woman
to vet, verify, and otherwise get the carfax on men they deal with...something that should be done today, but people call that "making mistakes." There is no fool-proof way to guard against
unscrupulous mothafukkas, but it goes both ways: Choose to have that child, especially with a man you haven't known for years upon years, you run the risk of doing it all alone.

Obviously there has to be some sort of ticker or tally so that a man can't do a bunch of these concurrently (like limiting it to 3 legal abortions for 5 years).

Again, the responsible men aren't going to change, cause this law means they have NO rights to the child, so legally, it isn't his, so there is no playing daddy when the child becomes a teen.
We have contraceptives up the ass. Use em, and be shrewed with who you have sex with. Also, ask ones self if they are willing to abort a child in the event the man proves to be unreliable.

I think more men than not don't act up b/c of the consequences. Takes those consequences away and you have a different man.

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

I feel like once this will be legal, it will eventually ripple over to the US. Just wondering how long it will take since the US is so conservative. Or will Conservatives be more willing to allow this than allowing women access to abortions.

Which is backwards thinking as fukk.... more fatherless kids = more poverty, more crime, more broken families, more kids suffering

Personally I think any dude who doesn't take responsibility for their kid, regardless of how that kid came to be, is the most yellow back of cowards. Women who keep the kid and get custody have like 99% of the responsibility for the child. Child support is nothing in comparison. So looking to run from the last shred of responsibility for a life you had a 50% contribution to creating is p*ssy as fukk.

They need to take everyone's nuts and ovaries away and make em get a license to earn them back.

 

[CinnaSlim]

And I'm telling you in such a hypothetical you wouldn't have a GOP congresss.

You keep baiting me down this argumentative rabbit hole. I hate you.


Why not? What makes this progressive? I see I am looking at it from my female perspective. But I don't see a down side to it for men and seeing as Congress is full of men, I don't see your perspective. Why do you think it wouldn't happen? I think Congress would use it to force women to be "more responsible", same way they are trying to do with closing abortion clinics.

 

[Beck.er.]

Conservatives will never go for it.
Abortions will increase and they will trend toward later in the pregnancy.

Conservatives are against abortion and want to put as many restrictions on it as possible
They are against any raise in taxes
They are against 'handouts' and entitlements
They don't give a shyt about income/housing/educational/health/job inequalities
They don't care about the health and wellbeing of babies/children after they've been delivered

They also don't like ideas/practices that come from hippie socialist godless liberal metrosexual libertine namby pamby Europe

 

[Mountain]

I think you're wrong. I don't know why you guys think abortion is like popping an aspirin and it's something done at the drop of a hat. More women than not would rather have the baby and deal with it on their own than go around and get abortions. Happens everyday. I think the numbers of unwanted children (by men) would drop but then you have a whole generation of men who never had a father and also don't think they need to be a father themselves. That's the generation we expect to be good fathers right? I could go on and on by this isn't a good thing but ya'll think it's great so I'll let ya'll have it. You guys really can't see the agenda behind this? Oh well.

Youre making it seem like a man forced into his childs life will turn into a model father once its born.

At the end of the day a man that clearly wants nothing to do with their unborn child (or its mother) will either 1) turn deadbeat when its born and want nothing to do with it or 2) be in the childs life marginally but resent and neglect it.

Growing up with no pops is less detrimental than growing up with one that doesnt want sht to do with you imo.

 

[Poitier]

You keep baiting me down this argumentative rabbit hole. I hate you.


Why not? What makes this progressive? I see I am looking at it from my female perspective. But I don't see a down side to it for men and seeing as Congress is full of men, I don't see your perspective. Why do you think it wouldn't happen? I think Congress would use it to force women to be "more responsible", same way they are trying to do with closing abortion clinics.

Conservatives will never go for it.
Abortions will increase and they will trend toward later in the pregnancy.

Conservatives are against abortion and want to put as many restrictions on it as possible
They are against any raise in taxes
They are against 'handouts' and entitlements
They don't give a shyt about income/housing/educational/health/job inequalities
They don't care about the health and wellbeing of babies/children after they've been delivered

They also don't like ideas/practices that come from hippie socialist godless liberal metrosexual libertine namby pamby Europe

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Well for starters, despite how the media tries to portray us a lot of black men actually want families.

But will a lot of BM want families if they feel they are not wanted or needed in one?

 

[Mr Hate Coffee]

Sounds like a recipe for disaster especially in the Black community. Ya'll hate the feminist agenda but something like this would be a strong part of it. Many feminist don't think men need to be present to raise child. I have a friend who is on this tip. Men would think they won with this one but the future of the community would lose exponentially.

Yeah they say that on one hand and then send the law after the baby father on the other hand. Most feminists aint about that single parenting life w/ one salary.

This law will never happen here for a lot of reasons. But I'm all for the conversation to point out how there's no such thing as equal rights between the sexes.