Should Men Be Allowed "Legal Abortion"?

[At30wecashout]

True. I can just see men using this as a get out of jail free card. Those men "worth being pursued" don't need to be cautious anymore. They can fukk anyone and run. A woman can only create one (usually) child at a time. Men on the other hand who are already inclined to "sow their oats" can impregnate limitless women. If their is no consequence for action what would be the motivation not to do it. Again, I am not taking about the bums who are doing it anyway. I am talking about the ones who are more responsible currently. What's now the motivation to be responsible?

Thats the thing. If they are responsible, they won't be the ones abusing this en masse. It literally becomes a "choose better" economy overnight. It becomes even more important for a woman
to vet, verify, and otherwise get the carfax on men they deal with...something that should be done today, but people call that "making mistakes." There is no fool-proof way to guard against
unscrupulous mothafukkas, but it goes both ways: Choose to have that child, especially with a man you haven't known for years upon years, you run the risk of doing it all alone.

Obviously there has to be some sort of ticker or tally so that a man can't do a bunch of these concurrently (like limiting it to 3 legal abortions for 5 years).

Again, the responsible men aren't going to change, cause this law means they have NO rights to the child, so legally, it isn't his, so there is no playing daddy when the child becomes a teen.
We have contraceptives up the ass. Use em, and be discriminatory with who you have sex with. Also, ask ones self if they are willing to abort a child in the event the man proves to be unreliable.

 

[Beck.er.]

Sweden provides far more social services and childcare than the U.S.

Nobody wants a raise in taxes, no one wants to give resources to other people's kids. The reason the courts get in it is because someone needs to help foot the bill and it ain't gonna be them. Yet it's been proven that those families often result in a burden on society that becomes generational.

Sweden is much smaller, far more liberal, taxed higher, way more collectivist/socialist tendencies, narrower disparities, greater job protections for parents, greater gender equality...just so different political/socially different than the US.
Its not gonna happen here. We have nothing in place to ensure it doesn't become disastrous.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

More women die from child births than abortions.

Still more dangerous than signing a piece of paper. Both physically and mentally.

 

[Poitier]

0% of anyone has ever died from signing a piece of paper I think was the point he was making.

This would be true whether this law existed or 100% men took care of their kids....a dumb point.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

This would be true whether this law existed or 100% men took care of their kids....a dumb point.

I believe you are intentionally missing the point.

 

[Poitier]

Still more dangerous than signing a piece of paper. Both physically and mentally.

And? Thats not the man's burden and there is no remedy for that after conception.

 

[Poitier]

I believe you are intentionally missing the point.

No, its a dumb point.

 

[Lady.Libra.]

So in the spirit of making sure the law is not lopsided, a woman getting an abortion consents to sterilization as well, yes?

Why should she be forced to murder if she is willing to birth, raise, and be financially responsible, amongst other things, by herself???? She isn't signing her child away.
Round and round we go?

 

[Still Benefited]

0% of anyone has ever died from signing a piece of paper I think was the point he was making.

But whether she has an abortion or has the baby the woman has to make a decision to go through with a tough medical experience....A morning after pill aint really all that dangerous is it?

 

[Raava]

I feel like once this will be legal, it will eventually ripple over to the US. Just wondering how long it will take since the US is so conservative. Or will Conservatives be more willing to allow this than allowing women access to abortions.

That would be really interesting.

So the man will be able to help create a child and then just opt out of respondsibility? While I feel a lot of things with the system towards men is unfair. This is also unfair. Either way the child loses for parents being irresponsible.

 

[Raava]

This is lopsided....
The man that signs away parental rights, should also be consenting to a irreversible vasectomy at the same time.

@Matt504

 

[BaldingSoHard]

Why should she be forced to murder if she is willing to birth, raise, and be financially responsible, amongst other things, by herself???? She isn't signing her child away.
Round and round we go?

I've read this 4x now and I have no idea what you're talking about. What does "forced to murder" mean in the context of what we're talking about? Who is forcing anyone to do anything?

 

[live it to the limit]

I don't think this would ever make it to the US because of the potential spike in welfare and food stamps. More single mothers.

 

[CinnaSlim]

Do you understand what the fukk a scenario is? Obviously this Congress wouldn't ever consider this law. Stop it

Boy, no shyt I made the thread. The thread is about what would happen if the law was here in the US. It is purely hypothetical and you are projecting your ideas as truth in a hypothetical situation.

 

[Wild self]

I feel like once this will be legal, it will eventually ripple over to the US. Just wondering how long it will take since the US is so conservative. Or will Conservatives be more willing to allow this than allowing women access to abortions.

Thank God for the Internet

The conservatives and greedy courts can't suppress information any longer