Should the number of senators be based on population ?

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
19,695
Reputation
4,137
Daps
93,564
I’ve always like a lot of folks thought it’s crazy how a sparely populated state like Wyoming has the same amount of senators as NY or TX. I was reading a article today and a senator from South fukking Dakota was talking about the stimulus check:heh: he has so much power by being a senator with like 10 folks in his state:mindblown:

what do y’all think :jbhmm:and sorry if this has been discussed before:whoa:
 

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
19,695
Reputation
4,137
Daps
93,564
Yes. Next question.
tenor.gif
 

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
19,695
Reputation
4,137
Daps
93,564
Do you guys think this would happen in the foreseeable future?
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,366
Reputation
4,587
Daps
120,508
Reppin
Detroit
Absolutely. How is it fair for California to get the same amount of Senate representation as Montana? :dahell:

Having two senators per state basically just means that people in small states have more voting power. It's inherently anti-democratic and unfair.


Do you guys think this would happen in the foreseeable future?

Not a chance in hell. You would need some kind of impossible Democratic supermajority.
 
Top