Dominicansbelit
All Star
hold dis L
shaq probably is a better scorer than jordan.. i would take a big man over a guard any day... ill take kareem over jordan... bigs are more important..
Since this is probably Kobe's last season playing, I guess it's time to admit
- Thread starter A.Boyd
- Start date
hold dis L
shaq probably is a better scorer than jordan.. i would take a big man over a guard any day... ill take kareem over jordan... bigs are more important..
Dominicansbelit
All Star
L for u.. kobe could have been the greatest.. why doesn't he pass more often like jordan did.. why does he dribble so much...kobe has a bad fg %.. kobe wastes possessions and doesnt have great defense
@Dominicansbelit U PASSIN OUT L'S LEFT N RIGHT, EVER WONDER WHY U HAVE SO MANY TO GIVE OUT?
THATS WHY LOSER
THATS WHY LOSER
KOBE AND JORDAN HAVE THE SAME ASSISTS PER GAME PER-36 MINUTES RETARD...JORDAN STATISTICALLY HELD THE BALL PER POSSESSION MORE THAN KOBE RETARD...KOBE IS 45% FROM THE FIELD ON HIS CAREER, WHICH IS CONSIDERED GOOD FOR A GUARD RETARD...KOBE HAS MORE ALL-DEFENSIVE NOMINATIONS UNDER HIS BELT THAN ANY OTHER PLAYER IN NBA HISTORY RETARD..........HOLD THIS DICC RETARD, MY WORK HERE IS DONE.
Dominicansbelit
All Star
look at turnovers.. 45 % fg is why kobe was never the best in the league...all defensive nominations
.. another L
Bilz
Superstar
If ring count measures greatness, why do you keep talking about Kobe scoring 81? He was nowhere close to a champion that year. You use that to talk about how dominant he was, yet your other arguments suggest it was a terrible season. Now is where you'll say it takes a team to win a championship and his teammates sucked.Yall only conveniently try to discredit ring count in these arguments cause it doesn't get YOU to the outcome yall are lookin for, we do believe rings = greatness and deep down yall know it measures greatness.@ LeBron endin up wit 6 titles thats pure stan fantasy but of course if he wasn't Batman or played like shyt he'd lose points, no one said Duncan was better than Kobe cause he wasn't the best player on his team by the time he got his 4th he was the 3rd best player on his team when he got his 5th and is the 4th best player on his team now.
And I am going to be nice and let you edit your post where you took away Duncans titles from the years he wasn't the clear cut #1. No Kobe fan in his right mind wants to take an argument to that dark place
look at turnovers.. 45 % fg is why kobe was never the best in the league...all defensive nominations
YOU TRYIN WAY TOO HARD
If ring count measures greatness, why do you keep talking about Kobe scoring 81? He was nowhere close to a champion that year. You use that to talk about how dominant he was, yet your other arguments suggest it was a terrible season. Now is where you'll say it takes a team to win a championship and his teammates sucked.
And I am going to be nice and let you edit your post where you took away Duncans titles from the years he wasn't the clear cut #1. No Kobe fan in his right mind wants to take an argument to that dark place
WHAT KOBE DID WITH SMUSH PARKER, LUKE WALTON, AND KWAME BROWN IN THE STARTING 5 WAS INCREDIBLE......THAT LAKER TEAM WOULDA EASILY MADE IT TO THE FINALS AND POSSIBLY EVEN WON IT ALL IF THEY PLAYED IN THE EAST. KOBE HAS NEVER WON TITLES AS A 3RD-4TH BEST PLAYER ON HIS TEAM, KOBE-SHAQ WAS ALWAYS 1A AND 1B, SHAQ ALREADY CALLED HIM THE BEST PLAYER IN THE WORLD BY 2001 AND HE WAS HIGHLY REGARDED AS THE BEST ALL-AROUND PLAYER IN THE LEAGUE BY THEN....NOT EVEN CLOSE TO COMPARABLE WITH DUNCAN'S ROLE IN SAN ANTONIO THE PAST COUPLE SEASONS. DUNCAN CAN DIE TOMORROW AND SPURS WOULD STILL BE ABOUT JUST AS GOOD AS THEY ARE NOW.
Stack Money
All Star
Nah you keep that L for yourself cause you just said a bunch of dumb shyt, FG% ain't more important than PPG if a player has a bad shootin night but still drops 40 the team is more likely to win than if he scores 15 points while makin most of his FGs. Kobe is a SG he's SUPPOSED to shoot obviously he's not gonna be averagin 50-60% bein the primary shooter but he has a great percentage for a SG, and no coach would take a slightly better than average player over a prime Kobe there ain't a coach alive that would tell you that. And Kobe >>> Duncan LeBron and Garnett, Garnett was never the best in the league and neither was Duncan Shaq and Kobe had that crown.
If ring count measures greatness, why do you keep talking about Kobe scoring 81? He was nowhere close to a champion that year. You use that to talk about how dominant he was, yet your other arguments suggest it was a terrible season. Now is where you'll say it takes a team to win a championship and his teammates sucked.
And I am going to be nice and let you edit your post where you took away Duncans titles from the years he wasn't the clear cut #1. No Kobe fan in his right mind wants to take an argument to that dark place
Ring count ain't the only thing that measures greatness but its the tie breaker when talkin about players on the same level of greatness, I only mentioned the 81 once or twice but the fact that Kobe scored 81 is proof of how great he is only one other player in history scored more points in a game and he's an all time great too. Kobe was dominant that season it was a terrible season cause his teammates were trash if it wasn't for him they woulda had the worst record in the league, I never said you can win championships by yourself but you can win wit decent teammates like LeBron had Kobe had horrible teammates in 06.I don't have to edit shyt cause I didn't take away Duncan's titles he still has those rings but that last one means less since he was the 3rd best on the team, its one thing not to be the clear cut #1 but when you far from bein #1 you have less braggin rights otherwise Robert Horry would be better than all these guys we talkin bout. Every Kobe fan knows this argument ain't a dark place for Kobe since he was always in the top 2 on his team unlike Duncan.
Your argument makes no sense if his body cant do something and he is still trying to do it that means he has a low bball iq. If he played within his current abilities then that would mean it was high.
4 Finals losses & 2011 epic choke job will always keep behind Kobe..
I ain't never seen Kobe get shut down in the Finals by Boris Diaw
2004 Finals was a choke job breh
2004 Finals was a choke job breh
Naw that whole lakers team just got beat.. What lebron did in the 4th in 2011 vs Dallas was historic
Ben.
Heisenbrook
Kobe shot them out of that series, what Kobe did was just as bad. He averaged 22 points on 22 shots that series
Th3G3ntleman
Superstar
Meh it was only close for one or two years. Lebrons clearly been the better player.
ACTUALLY, NO .. I MEAN, IF HE WAS ACTUALLY HURTING THE TEAM AND STOPPING THEM FROM SUCCEEDING, THEN YEA..BUT HES CLEARLY JUS TRYNA FIND A RHYTHM DURING THE MIDST OF A LOST SEASON, SO ITS OK. BASKETBALL IQ IS HOW MUCH U UNDERSTAND THE GAMS.. HOW U APPLY THAT IQ IS A WHOLE NOTHER STORY.