KravenMorehead™
Barrel Brothers.®
And he shouldn't be?
But it sure does guarantee he's guilty to your ilk.
why don't y'all learn?

And he shouldn't be?
But it sure does guarantee he's guilty to your ilk.

It's all a part of your act.Please don't go into a "woe is me, black men are always the guilty ones," speech.
I'm sorry but being male and having black skin is *an automatic guilty sentence to me no matter the case

I'm sorry but being male and having black skin is not going to garner my automatic sympathy, defense, & assumption of your innocence.
![]()
Of course the coli is going to defend him.
And he was found innocent... why now the hoopla? 

The way it's define would likely be decided by a court of law. Just like they could decide to charge someone with man slaughter or murder after killing someone. The outcome is the same for the victim but different for the defendant depending on the context and the evidence the prosecutor has to charge.
Child, I'm am not being played by anyone. I have my own mind and that is why I won't let you dictate my opinion. My own moral compass about what I think is right and wrong, not "the system" or "the man," dictates my opinion. Thank you very much.

I'm in this thread because someone tagged me and then others started asking me questions while also ignoring the answers that I already posted (such as saying in my first response in this thread...Nate was found not guilty). Either because they don't know how to build an argument without using straw men, they can't follow a conversation (they just jump in the middle of shyt), or they simply can't comprehend. Not sure which one you are.
Any other questions?
A Court of Law said Nate Parker was innocent of the charges against him, so why are you still babbling about crimes Nate Parker didn't commit at 12 am (eastern time)? This is like me having a debate about You getting charged for Robbery yet the court of law said you are innocent. It's idiotic.
So long story short you enjoy rambling about imaginary what if scenarios.
Every single post of mine, when asked, has acknowledged that he was found not guilty. So, I guess you fall in the lack of comprehension group...
You were played
But that's... Ok
it's understandable
No, I answered questions that were asked. I didn't come in this thread when it was made because I had already been in a thread about this situation. I came in this thread after being tagged and I subsequently answered questions that were asked. ALL of my posts have been in response to direct questions. So what the fukk are you talking about?
Yes, I can't comprehend why you you waste your time rambling about imaginary scenarios. The lack of logic is mind blowing.
No, you just can't comprehend in general; they have school for that, you know.
If I tag you in a thread about Lil Bow Wow getting raped by his Limo Driver in 2002 will you give the same type of performance you did in this thread?
One second you are talking about why are people defending Nate the next you are talking about you always thought he was innocent. If someone is innocent then there is nothing to defend.
You can't even answer my what is rape scenario lol. Log out and call it a night.