Sista Who Went To PSU with Nate Parker Clears The Smoke :wow:

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
26,789
Reputation
3,657
Daps
61,155
I'm sorry but being male and having black skin is not going to garner my automatic sympathy, defense, & assumption of your innocence.

Nicki-Minaj-Shrug-Gesture-Reaction-Gif.gif


Of course the coli is going to defend him.


That's not why he's being defended.
An rational person would look at Nates career and realize that 17 years has past. That in all of this time and previous films he's made, there was never a dust up of this magnitude.

So then one would gather, why now? :jbhmm: And he was found innocent... why now the hoopla?
If you are a rational person you'd then begin to place things into contex. Suddenly the pot of information you have stinks. :feedme:

A rational person would then give pause and step away from the stinky pot. :scust:
 

Apollo Creed

Look at your face
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
61,188
Reputation
14,929
Daps
228,039
Reppin
Handsome Boyz Ent
The way it's define would likely be decided by a court of law. Just like they could decide to charge someone with man slaughter or murder after killing someone. The outcome is the same for the victim but different for the defendant depending on the context and the evidence the prosecutor has to charge.

A Court of Law said Nate Parker was innocent of the charges against him, so why are you still babbling about crimes Nate Parker didn't commit at 12 am (eastern time)? This is like me having a debate about You getting charged for Robbery yet the court of law said you are innocent. It's idiotic.
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
26,789
Reputation
3,657
Daps
61,155
Child, I'm am not being played by anyone. I have my own mind and that is why I won't let you dictate my opinion. My own moral compass about what I think is right and wrong, not "the system" or "the man," dictates my opinion. Thank you very much.


You were played :francis:

But that's... Ok
it's understandable
 

Apollo Creed

Look at your face
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
61,188
Reputation
14,929
Daps
228,039
Reppin
Handsome Boyz Ent
I'm in this thread because someone tagged me and then others started asking me questions while also ignoring the answers that I already posted (such as saying in my first response in this thread...Nate was found not guilty). Either because they don't know how to build an argument without using straw men, they can't follow a conversation (they just jump in the middle of shyt), or they simply can't comprehend. Not sure which one you are.

Any other questions?

So long story short you enjoy rambling about imaginary what if scenarios.
 

SouthernBelle

#Feyonce
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
6,463
Reputation
510
Daps
12,426
A Court of Law said Nate Parker was innocent of the charges against him, so why are you still babbling about crimes Nate Parker didn't commit at 12 am (eastern time)? This is like me having a debate about You getting charged for Robbery yet the court of law said you are innocent. It's idiotic.

Every single post of mine, when asked, has acknowledged that he was found not guilty. So, I guess you fall in the lack of comprehension group...
 

SouthernBelle

#Feyonce
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
6,463
Reputation
510
Daps
12,426
So long story short you enjoy rambling about imaginary what if scenarios.

No, I answered questions that were asked. I didn't come in this thread when it was made because I had already been in a thread about this situation. I came in this thread after being tagged and I subsequently answered questions that were asked. ALL of my posts have been in response to direct questions. So what the fukk are you talking about?
 

SouthernBelle

#Feyonce
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
6,463
Reputation
510
Daps
12,426
You were played :francis:

But that's... Ok
it's understandable

If that makes you feel better about your moral compass, again more power to you sir (as I said multiple times since your response to me simply answering, very matter of factly, a question that YOU asked about the case).
 

Apollo Creed

Look at your face
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
61,188
Reputation
14,929
Daps
228,039
Reppin
Handsome Boyz Ent
No, I answered questions that were asked. I didn't come in this thread when it was made because I had already been in a thread about this situation. I came in this thread after being tagged and I subsequently answered questions that were asked. ALL of my posts have been in response to direct questions. So what the fukk are you talking about?

If I tag you in a thread about Lil Bow Wow getting raped by his Limo Driver in 2002 will you give the same type of performance you did in this thread?

One second you are talking about why are people defending Nate the next you are talking about you always thought he was innocent. If someone is innocent then there is nothing to defend.

You can't even answer my what is rape scenario lol. Log out and call it a night.
 

Apollo Creed

Look at your face
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
61,188
Reputation
14,929
Daps
228,039
Reppin
Handsome Boyz Ent
No, you just can't comprehend in general; they have school for that, you know.

I don't waste my time trying to comprehend illogical rambling. At this point you don't even know why you are in here, what you believe, or what your going to eat for lunch tomorrow.
 

SouthernBelle

#Feyonce
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
6,463
Reputation
510
Daps
12,426
If I tag you in a thread about Lil Bow Wow getting raped by his Limo Driver in 2002 will you give the same type of performance you did in this thread?

One second you are talking about why are people defending Nate the next you are talking about you always thought he was innocent. If someone is innocent then there is nothing to defend.

You can't even answer my what is rape scenario lol. Log out and call it a night.

This posts just proves me right, you have difficulty with reading comprehension. Poor thing.

Show me where I asked why people are defending Nate. I actually said, it's very typical for men to defend other men in this situation because they aren't typically victims of rape. My general response has been more power to you when someone said "oh well, I will support him anyway.

Second, I never said that I thought he was innocent. I said that his case wasn't cut and dry given the circumstances and, even now, a jury could have a difficult time convicting beyond a reasonable doubt. I also said I don't think the girl would have pressed charges in the second guy wasn't involved.

Third, not guilty is not the same thing as innocent.

And finally, I answered your question. You just didn't like the answer.

If you want me to stop responding, then stop quoting me. I'm not your child; you cannot send me to bed. Thanks for trying.
 
Last edited:
Top