I pretty sure 99% of black people on the site agree with you on trump including me. The question is how can you feel that way about trump in 4 years when Biden has been a racist for over 30 years?
@Skooby is a Trump-supporting c00n; (More confirmed Trump supporters)
- Thread starter AceMan
- Start date
Yes he is.
get these nets
Veteran
Trump is in office now, dictating policy and making decisions now while unapologetically promoting racism now.
Biden was vice president under a Black man and an African American chief of staff for 8 years. During this run, he was endorsed by longtime African American elected officials. in the CBC as the better of the 2 choices.
That's how.
Here’s when people get called trump supporters. In your own word trump “promotes” racism but you haven’t said specifically what legislation he’s passed specifically purposed to harm black people. He promotes racism but so has literally every president before him. Joe Biden is in office now has been in office for 30+ years and has WRITTEN laws and PASSED laws that are designed to specifically harm black people yet you have no problem with that? He was in bed some of the worst racist like strom Thurman. But the laws he’s used to destroy an entire generation of black men doesn’t matter because he was Obamas vp? Sometimes I think you posters are just to young to understand some of the ramifications of joe Biden’s policies or you’re just ignorant.
get these nets
Veteran
Uh, no.
Insults and deflections are not going to do it. The current DOJ is actively challenging affirmative action policies in American colleges. One of Trump's recent campaign talking points was aimed directly at White suburbanites, that Booker and Biden were going to cause an invasion of the suburbs, by proposing legislation to allow low income housing to be built in their communities. Yes, he used the word invasion.
We can do this all day.
What's your evidence?
“we're going to have to deal with the immigration crisis we have. i'm going to send the house and senate an immigration bill that's going to provide access to citizenship to 11 million people,” he said.
Biden...
Will provide access to citizenship to illegal immigrants if elected: Biden
I didn’t insult you? I said you may be ignorant because some posters were young when joe Biden was an open racist. As for deflections I asked you a specific question about laws that trump has passed specifically against black people and you brought up “words” “talking points” and “proposing legislation” that is a deflection. I can post an avalanche of laws that joe Biden has used to destroy the black community. If you can’t answer the question that’s fine but don’t call someone a trump supporter because you can’t be accountable for supporting a racist.
There’s literally another thread about it on this website and then there’s Google. Not trying to be rude. This is coming directly from his campaign.
What you said is encouraging but I’m pretty sure he’s only referring to the Democrats involved with the presidency. They said they would do these things but if they actually implement these policies it will be under vague and conspicuous language such as “minority” or “underserved community” never specifically for black people.
Ironically the same cacs you said are mad are the same Democrats that people on here complain about. The same cacs that said Bernie sanders didn’t deserve the democratic nomination because he’s to “socialist”
get these nets
Veteran
Trump Administration Eliminates Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule, NLIHC and other Advocates Condemn Action, Rhetoric
Trump Administration Eliminates Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule, NLIHC and other Advocates Condemn Action, Rhetoric
Jul 27, 2020
The Trump Administration abruptly issued its final rule, “Preserving Community and Housing Choice,” which repeals 2015 regulations implementing the statutory obligation to “affirmatively further fair housing” (AFFH). NLIHC and 14 other civil rights and housing organizations issued a media statement condemning the administration’s action as well as the president’s use of incendiary racial rhetoric about the move for political gain.
The 2015 regulations, which were suspended by HUD Secretary Ben Carson in 2018 (see Memo, 5/21), were the first significant regulations since the Fair Housing Act of 1968 requiring federal agencies, particularly HUD, as well as states, counties, and cities to affirmatively further fair housing if they receive HUD funds. The Fair Housing Act not only banned discrimination, but it also required meaningful actions to undo decades of federal, state, and local discriminatory policies and practices that resulted in segregated communities.
The announcement about the final rule on July 23 follows President Trump’s recent false Twitter claim that the AFFH rule was having “a devastating impact on these once thriving suburban areas,” would “destroy the suburbs,” and was “not fair to homeowners.” The preamble to the final rule states that after reviewing Secretary Carson’s proposed AFFH rule (see Memo, 1/13), “the President expressed concern that the HUD approach did not go far enough,” and “The President therefore asked HUD to reconsider the rule to see whether HUD could do more…to empower local communities and to reduce the regulatory burden of providing unnecessary data to HUD. After review, and based on prior internal discussions, HUD produced the current rule.”
============================
Affirmative action guidelines dropped by Trump administration
Civil rights groups see President Donald Trump’s decision as part of a larger effort to scrap affirmative action, which has been upheld repeatedly by the Supreme Court, though that could change with the appointment of a new justice. | Evan Vucci/AP Photo
Affirmative action guidelines dropped by Trump administration
07/03/2018
The Trump administration on Tuesday scrapped Obama-era guidance on race-based admissions policies — just as conservatives see a fresh opening to end affirmative action through a changing Supreme Court.
The move comes as a closely watched court battle over Harvard's admissions policies — which has emerged as the next front in the fight over race-based admissions — heats up. Civil rights groups see the Trump administration's decision as part of a larger effort to scrap affirmative action, which has been upheld repeatedly by the Supreme Court, though that could change with the appointment of a new justice soon to be picked by President Donald Trump.
The Justice Department announced it was eliminating 24 federal guidance documents that it deemed "unnecessary, outdated, inconsistent with existing law, or otherwise improper."
Seven of those were documents issued jointly with the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights under the Obama administration that called on school superintendents and colleges to consider race when trying to diversify their campuses
-------------------------------
Now, if your take about the crime bill being racist because it disproportionately affected Blacks, how would you not classify these recent actions by the Trump administration as racist?
Preach
get these nets
Veteran
Thanks, it's a sign of the times when operating like this stands out, but I'll take it.Then I thank you for being one of the few creating contextual discussion and asking people to substantiate their position on issues.
Will also tag you when/ if the guy answers the question.
Last edited:
@Billy Ocean i don’t care about internet points especially from a homosexual