Slavery was Capitalism's best friend

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,362
Reputation
1,900
Daps
12,858
Reppin
NULL
The roots of racism
^^very long but solid article. And if you look around. for you to thrive at capitalism. dont you always have to have a slave of some sort? meaning someone or something producing something that you are selling at an extremely high rate for a very small cost. that could be slaves in people or slaves in machines(nowadays). or Both. For any country to kick start their economy they always seem to have it going on the backs of slaves. people you're not paying properly for the amt of work they are doing. This is a huge portion of the "global economy" which is all about capitalism. You can no longer punk your own citizens into taking peanuts. so you take the show on the road where people in other lands are willing to take crumbs for the same work you would have to pay a steak for in the states.

Slavery and capitalism

Slavery in the colonies helped produce a boom in the 18th century economy that provided the launching pad for the industrial revolution in Europe. From the start, colonial slavery and capitalism were linked. While it is not correct to say that slavery created capitalism, it is correct to say that slavery provided one of the chief sources for the initial accumulations of wealth that helped to propel capitalism forward in Europe and North America.

The clearest example of the connection between plantation slavery and the rise of industrial capitalism was the connection between the cotton South, Britain and, to a lesser extent, the Northern industrial states. Here, we can see the direct link between slavery in the U.S. and the development of the most advanced capitalist production methods in the world. Cotton textiles accounted for 75 percent of British industrial employment in 1840, and, at its height, three-fourths of that cotton came from the slave plantations of the Deep South. And Northern ships and ports transported the cotton.

To meet the boom in the 1840s and 1850s, the planters became even more vicious. On the one hand, they tried to expand slavery into the West and Central America. The fight over the extension of slavery into the territories eventually precipitated the Civil War in 1861. On the other hand, they drove slaves harder--selling more cotton to buy more slaves just to keep up. On the eve of the Civil War, the South was petitioning to lift the ban on the importation of slaves that had existed officially since 1808.

Karl Marx clearly understood the connection between plantation slavery in the cotton South and the development of capitalism in England. He wrote in Capital:

While the cotton industry introduced child-slavery into England, in the United States, it gave the impulse for the transformation of the more or less patriarchal slavery into a system of commercial exploitation. In fact, the veiled slavery of the wage-laborers in Europe needed the unqualified slavery of the New World as its pedestal. Capital comes dripping from head to toe, from every pore, with blood and dirt.

The close connection between slavery and capitalism, and thus, between racism and capitalism, gives the lie to those who insist that slavery would have just died out. In fact, the South was more dependent on slavery right before the Civil War than it was 50 or 100 years earlier. Slavery lasted as long as it did because it was profitable. And it was profitable to the richest and most "well-bred" people in the world...................
 

Tate

Kae☭ernick Loyalist
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
4,274
Reputation
795
Daps
15,042
Bapist's new book on this is good. Haven't finished it yet tho
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,362
Reputation
1,900
Daps
12,858
Reppin
NULL
There is no 'was' it continues to be.
which was my own point. its always going to be slavery. whether its people or machines. or both(which it currently is now).

it may or may not be all slaves in the US(slaves in jail though), the US has outsourced their slaves. thats all.
 
Last edited:

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,362
Reputation
1,900
Daps
12,858
Reppin
NULL
:jbhmm:Is the argument here that you can't have capitalism/capitalism can't succeed, without slavery?

Or is this just a refresher on American history?
Can capitalism work like it has in america without slavery?
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,494
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,798
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
which was my own point. its always going to be slavery. whether its people or machines. or both(which it currently is now).

it may or may not be all slaves in the US(slaves in jail though), the US has outsourced their slaves. thats all.
Your defining slave so broadly it's almost meaningless... and insulting to the African Americans that lived it(slavery).
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,362
Reputation
1,900
Daps
12,858
Reppin
NULL
Your defining slave so broadly it's almost meaningless... and insulting to the African Americans that lived it(slavery).
lol, i knew it, i knew it. i knew you were going to go there.
so i'll help you out.
i'm calling slave labor from actual slaves all the way to people in jail making 2 cents on the dollar while working, all the way to someone in say Guatemala sewing a sweater for a nickel. knowing good and well said worker is living a 3rd world life style off of that amt of money.while also working in awful conditions.

lets just call all of that slavery.
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,799
Reputation
570
Daps
22,758
Reppin
Arrakis
capitalism being tied to slavery is not good of enough reason to try dismiss capitalism, because capitalism is the only way black people will ever come up economically

there is no economic hope for black people or anybody else in socialism, socialism is a dead end, its been proven time and time again
 
Top