The league is different now and a lot of the players on the Blazers roster aint what they used to be or were never as good as people made them out to be.Compare Dame's current roster to the 2014-15 GSW roster. He got enough help.
The league is different now and a lot of the players on the Blazers roster aint what they used to be or were never as good as people made them out to be.Compare Dame's current roster to the 2014-15 GSW roster. He got enough help.
Will the Warriors be ahead of the Blazers this year?I'm glad all these "Dame is better than Steph" ass nikkas that were around in the playoffs are finally quiet.
Will the Warriors be ahead of the Blazers this year?
wins & losses are credited to the franchise not just one player i know we sometimes fall into pinning it to one player but it's simply not realityLol He’s had nothing but them is the point my guy . Like literally nothing but off series over his 8 or 9 year career, and the rosters have had turnover over that span....so the issue is him. Stop blame deflecting. He’s the leader he has to step up at some point and transcend....if he’s the player y’all allege him to be that is
.
it definitely does work both ways great franchises definitely elevate great playersThis has already happened so the talent is there. But if your leader is deadass and no exaggeration shyt in every series he participates in, it’s only so much galvanizing you can expect the role/lesser players to do. He’s getting paid the big boy bucks to elevate them and not just himself, not the other way round....again, blame deflecting
.
they got love because they were known to be great players who were in not so great situationsA.I got more peer love than the Glove. KG more peer love than Duncan etc etc....that means nothing. And you just said nothing
.
the standard bearer for success is chef/golden.state currently right¿This thread has nothing to do with Steph, stay on topic. This is about Dame. It’s y’all who claim, it’s y’all who allege that he’s better than or at the very worse equal to Steph....so the expectations of a “lesser” player are moot in this evaluation of Dame. Stop bringing him up, y’all do that a lot when you have no substantive defense for why ya boy folds every year and why y’all be scared to hold him to any type of standard.
Probably not. Warriors don't have a good bench and a CJ McCollum level player alongside Steph.
If Draymond looks like Draymond again that would help
Anytime anyone does this with Dame I'm always curious about the expectations. No one is realistically expecting him to beat LA so what is this conversation really about? Before that there was no realistic expectations for them to beat Golden State neither
People bringing up Iverson, but his team at least had a puncher's chance of going to the finals that one time he did, but the trailblazers as a team have never really even been a top 3 favorite to even win a title, have they?
Steph has been on a perennial title contending team up until last year.
CJ that much better than Wiggins to you?Probably not. Warriors don't have a good bench and a CJ McCollum level player alongside Steph.
If Draymond looks like Draymond again that would help
Lol bruh what. I don’t even feel like addressing all that nonsense.wins & losses are credited to the franchise not just one player i know we sometimes fall into pinning it to one player but it's simply not reality
roster turnover is cool but if the roster never equals up to the other contenders you are facing what is the expectation¿
to burn the wick down just to get into the postseason then elevate that's some shyte very few have done
it's not set so that he's taking quarters off & games off to have a full tank where is the level up supposed to come from¿
this ain't a movie where folks somehow play better at their most exhausted & ran down
ha
it definitely does work both ways great franchises definitely elevate great players
the blazers haven't built something that can compete without dame
they pay him big boy bucks because the franchise is on his back right now
they got love because they were known to be great players who were in not so great situations
that is something that can determine a career arc
the standard bearer for success is chef/golden.state currently right¿
it is not a matter of being a lesser player as much as it is being in a less ideal situation
let's see how everything plays out as the standard shifts
when the standard bearers can't even meet the standard then what becomes the reason¿
*
ha there are a handful of better teams in the west alone what type of mission impossible shyte you looking for¿*Lol bruh what. I don’t even feel like addressing all that nonsense.
Dame has a roster, the team needs to be in contention this year. Period
CJ that much better than Wiggins to you?
Same field goal percentage as Wiggins thoYes. CJ is probably the second best perimeter shooter off the dribble in the league, great handle and clutch. He doesn't defend well but doesn't really need to in the regular season.
Same field goal percentage as Wiggins thoand Wiggins is the better defender.
Lakers, Clippers and maybe Denver that’s it. 4 seed and should push either of those 3 teams to the brink in the 2nd rd instead getting his ass broomed like he do every yearha there are a handful of better teams in the west alone what type of mission impossible shyte you looking for¿*
iight let's see*Lakers, Clippers and maybe Denver that’s it. 4 seed and should push either of those 3 teams to the brink in the 2nd rd instead getting his ass broomed like he do every year