So brehs...

[Broad Street Bully]

In 2015 WWE, we have a Dudley Boys reunion, right? Undertaker, at 50 years of age, beating Brock Lesnar right? Sting, at 50-something years of age going for the WWE title, right? So brehs... ain't this what yall clowned TNA so much over the years for? Are we gonna overlook this and charge it to the game or what? I'm at work, bored as shyt and just wanted to point that out

 

[MightyHealthy]

Part timers in the product. That's another thing I railed on years ago...


...now we have part timer vs. part timer headlining PPVs

 

[Blacknwhite]

You are right about the undertaker and probably sting. But the Dudleyz are the GOAT tag team who can still go in the ring and will only help the tag division.
plus one is a former world champ but the E will never recognize that

 

[NoMorePie]

Dudley Boyz are the shyt though

 

[RammerJammer]

Dudley Boyz proved last year that they can go, plus they probably will wrestle full time on TV like the New Age Outlaws last year. Sting and Taker? They a different story

 

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

Dudley boys are in perfect tag team shape and are a novelty we havent seen as the official dudley boys in like 10 years or so.

Taker and sting have a little bit of credibility left and can co main event and be used to give new guys a rub bht only brock is the only guy i see as a guy that should be top champ

 

[Broad Street Bully]

the main point of this thread is how TNA got clowned on for not pushing young guys while all the flabby n sick, older nikkas got ahead, while the same is going on in the E right now. And in no way am I caping for TNA either seeing as I haven't seen an episode since like March

 

[StatUS]

The double champ is a new guy.

Reigns, Ambrose, and Wyatt headline houseshows.

And they're trying to get the divas to a better place.

I don't have a problem with this as long as people get put over.

 

[TL15]

the main point of this thread is how TNA got clowned on for not pushing young guys while all the flabby n sick, older nikkas got ahead, while the same is going on in the E right now. And in no way am I caping for TNA either seeing as I haven't seen an episode since like March

I feel you there... but at least WWE is pulling "top guys"

TNA was hyping matches between Anderson and Meth Hardy and neither has the draw of Sting Undertaker Dudleys and definitely not Brock

 

[GreenGrass]

Remember, Vince is still the president. Don't be surprised by this.

 

[Tanahashi Coates]

I think a lot of fans who grew up in the 80s and 90s have an attachment to WWF/E. When Rock/Brock/Sting /Dudleys music hit it was like because of the nostalgia. This is my favorite ECW moment of theirs.

 

[DamonDashsRocAFellaChain]

That's a good point breh

 

[James Dean]

Somewhat a good point but a moot one. Nothing wrong with part timers as long as there is balance.

NXT is doing a stellar job for the future. Its 50/50 on the main roster but nowhere near as bad and blatant as TNA did it.

 

[Broad Street Bully]

Somewhat a good point but a moot one. Nothing wrong with part timers as long as there is balance.

NXT is doing a stellar job for the future. Its 50/50 on the main roster but nowhere near as bad and blatant as TNA did it.

yeah you right. at least they do have NXT and have a plan for the future

 

[RammerJammer]

the main point of this thread is how TNA got clowned on for not pushing young guys while all the flabby n sick, older nikkas got ahead, while the same is going on in the E right now. And in no way am I caping for TNA either seeing as I haven't seen an episode since like March

The problem was, the old guys were the Champs like Sting and Mick Foley. Booker, Steiner, Nash and Hall were the tag team Champs. And they constantly re-did old WCW storylines....with the same guys (Main Event Mafia=Billionaires Club, Immortal=NWO).