So PS4 outsold Xbox of black Friday

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,788
Reputation
8,200
Daps
113,163
@winb83

I agree with a lot of what you said, but reality is Microsoft really didn't put out anything hot this year either. I think Halo 5 is a very well made multiplayer game, the best multiplayer Halo since Halo 3. But that's all it is, it's doing nothing we haven't seen before and it's not a game changer. Forza 6 is another Forza, again. And Tomb Raider, well, all they did with that was pay Square Enix off to not release it on PS4. I'm not giving MS any credit on that one, all they did was piss people off and make the game bomb sales wise. Not to mention the Xbone version runs like shyt and the Xbox audience barely supported it. It's ironic, the PS4 version (and PC of course) will be the better version to play.

And really the only reason you can push the Sony gave us nothing narrative is because Uncharted 4 got delayed to 2016. That was the big Fall 2015 title originally, and it would have crushed Halo 5. It got delayed, so now people act like "Sony isn't doing anything". Nah, they delayed the game because it needed more time, that's admirable. Not to mention Sony helped publish and produce Bloodborne in collaboration with From Software, which is a GOTY contender and better than any Xbox exclusive this year. That gets ignored of course because it came out in March, not the holidays.

And then just from a console standpoint, the PS4 is still the better console. Better UI/dashboard, better versions of multiplats and better third party support.
the ps4 dashboard is automatically better because of how good the themes are.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
47,823
Reputation
4,132
Daps
72,176
Reppin
Michigan
I'm not sure I follow the bolded.
The NPD shows the majority of big games are selling mostly on PS4. This "AAA BIG EXCLUSIVE" narrative isn't the driving point for every gamer out there. If the game is hot and it gets good marketing, it'll sell. infamous second son sold well over 1 million WW in 9 days and that was a solid game. Driveclub sold 2 million despite it's launch struggles and negative stigma. The post launch support and sales gave it some legs so some people start to hear word of mouth about it and see the low entry price and go ahead and cop it. Anecdotal but I know people in real life who own PS4 and usually their biggest games are multiplatform. I rarely know people who are heavily into games like Bloodborne or Uncharted yet online people will talk about that all day.

The majority of people though are buying the Batmans, the witchers and Battlefields of today. The only reason I can see a game like Halo selling worse than it did from it's earlier installments is that the Xbox install base isn't as big it would've been had everything went smooth.

The majority of people who own Xbox Ones I'd say are the hardcore loyalists and the rest maybe casuals. the majority of fans from last gen are on PS4 now so those who would've bought Halo and whatnot aren't even on Xbox anymore and Halo 5 from what I've seen is just a decent MP game. It's the lowest reviewed Halo game(SP I'd say is the reason why it scored much lower than Halo 3 and 4.)

The notion that everyone is just buying what everyone else is is true but it's not going to be a "Hey.. what the hell is with PS4? There's nothing on it!." The majority of games sell mostly on PS4 and a lot of them(3rd party) are great games.
What I'm saying is if Sony ceased development of AAA 1st party titles for the rest of this generation it probably wouldn't even dent their sales. Exclusives don't really matter anymore. Brand perception is more important.

I'm a rare breed. I favor the PS4 over the Xbox One for JRPGs. Most people don't play the niche style games I do. To the common gamer there is virtually little difference between the library of the PS4 and Xbox One but Mattrick pretty much destroyed the Xbox Brand before he left Microsoft. Microsoft could put out the best games this console generation and it wouldn't help their sales. The Xbox is a dying brand. It's dying a slow painful death. Eventually Microsoft will throw in the towel on it. They're already shifting the focus away from selling hardware to Xbox as a service. I strongly believe this will be the last Xbox console.

It's sad in a way because when Xbox finally does shut down nobody is going to attempt to fill that void. Personally I'd rather see the two trade blows because one company will keep the other company honest competition wise. Unfortunately for us that didn't happen. If a company as large as Microsoft couldn't create a viable gaming brand in the console space in well over 14 years honestly what other company stands a chance to do better?
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,788
Reputation
8,200
Daps
113,163
What I'm saying is if Sony ceased development of AAA 1st party titles for the rest of this generation it probably wouldn't even dent their sales. Exclusives don't really matter anymore. Brand perception is more important.

I'm a rare breed. I favor the PS4 over the Xbox One for JRPGs. Most people don't play the niche style games I do. To the common gamer there is virtually little difference between the library of the PS4 and Xbox One but Mattrick pretty much destroyed the Xbox Brand before he left Microsoft. Microsoft could put out the best games this console generation and it wouldn't help their sales. The Xbox is a dying brand. It's dying a slow painful death. Eventually Microsoft will throw in the towel on it. They're already shifting the focus away from selling hardware to Xbox as a service. I strongly believe this will be the last Xbox console.

It's sad in a way because when Xbox finally does shut down nobody is going to attempt to fill that void. Personally I'd rather see the two trade blows because one company will keep the other company honest competition wise. Unfortunately for us that didn't happen. If a company as large as Microsoft couldn't create a viable gaming brand in the console space in well over 14 years honestly what other company stands a chance to do better?
Third Party games have always been the bread and butter of Sony consoles since the beginning. I definitely think their sales would suffer a little bit though if NOTHING from their first party output came out. I know that games like UC4, FFVII Remake and God of War are system sellers. Lots of people waiting for those games to come out.

Xbox has their loyalists in the US. Outside the US, nobody really cares about them. I don't know what they gonna do to increase their brand elsewhere. I simply saw the Xbox 360 as a fluke. It just was out at a good time and had momentum while Sony fukked up at first. The biggest difference between Xbox's success last gen and PS3's triump last gen was that PS3 at first had a lot going against it but it still had the brand name behind it and the games came out strong from 2008 onwards. PS3 was simply too costly last gen. Once it dropped to $299, that was the sweet spot and then the games were already on point. This gen though, Xbox dropped it's price and whatnot but the brand name was marred already and the "games" are practically the same as what's on PS4. Halo isn't a big deal anymore. I think Destiny really took a bite out of Halo's Shine. If Halo, the biggest IP Microsoft had is sitting at number 8 on an NPD after being out for a month, that says a lot. Bloodborne, a relatively niche title charted at number 2 for Feb. this year.
 
Last edited:

CurrencyChase

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,991
Reputation
-572
Daps
12,317
Reppin
Ohio, Iowa, & Minnesota
People are sheep they'll buy what everyone else buys because everyone else is buying it. I used to work retail I know this first hand. At one point you couldn't find a Wii in a store and it wasn't because the system had great games. One day everyone woke up and realized what a POS that system was but by that point it had far outsold it's competition all of which had far superior games.

The reality of it is this. Don Mattrick pissed off the enthusiast gaming community with questionable design choices and decisions then he bailed on the company. The early enthusiast ran to PlayStation. Since then Sony really hasn't done anything to deserve the lead they have. People are following the leader like lemmings no thought required. Sony has been coasting on fumes for well over a year. At this point they could never put out another major AAA game and they'd still outsell everyone. This year is proof.

If anything Sony is slowly creeping back to that PS3 attitude of fukk you pay me. Microsoft does backwards compatibility. Sony says they have no interest in it. Suddenly a while after it goes live on Xbox Sony does a 360 and says they'll do it and requires you to rebuy games you already own. Microsoft lets you put the disc in the drive to authenticate and you can just play.
you're only looking at the things Microsoft did wrong at the start of this Gen but not looking at what Playstation did right at the end of last gen. Microsoft pretty much stopped making games after they won while Playstation was releasing the last of us, Ninokuni, God of war ascension, Dragons crown, Beyond 2 souls, Gran turismo..

Then people realized that Microsoft is quick to stop supporting their system when they're #1 while Playstation has consistently been supporting their systems with exclusive late in the consoles life (PS1, PS2, and now PS3).

The peoples mindset was already shifting in the UK and the USA..The rest of the world was PlayStation>>>Any console regardless...


another thing is you seem like the type that plays JRPG which makes the bolded very weird. Just because Playstation likes to spread out their exclusive and support different types of games instead of releasing all the exclusive they have in Nov, Dec and keep rehashing Halo, Gears..does not mean they are not putting out games.
 
Last edited:

CurrencyChase

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,991
Reputation
-572
Daps
12,317
Reppin
Ohio, Iowa, & Minnesota
What I'm saying is if Sony ceased development of AAA 1st party titles for the rest of this generation it probably wouldn't even dent their sales. Exclusives don't really matter anymore. Brand perception is more important.

I'm a rare breed. I favor the PS4 over the Xbox One for JRPGs. Most people don't play the niche style games I do. To the common gamer there is virtually little difference between the library of the PS4 and Xbox One but Mattrick pretty much destroyed the Xbox Brand before he left Microsoft. Microsoft could put out the best games this console generation and it wouldn't help their sales. The Xbox is a dying brand. It's dying a slow painful death. Eventually Microsoft will throw in the towel on it. They're already shifting the focus away from selling hardware to Xbox as a service. I strongly believe this will be the last Xbox console.

It's sad in a way because when Xbox finally does shut down nobody is going to attempt to fill that void. Personally I'd rather see the two trade blows because one company will keep the other company honest competition wise. Unfortunately for us that didn't happen. If a company as large as Microsoft couldn't create a viable gaming brand in the console space in well over 14 years honestly what other company stands a chance to do better?
you feel bad that the xbox brand might be dying and you fear that PlayStation might get cocky because they have no competition in the future but history proves that the Playstation brand always released a lot of exclusives, and 3rd party partnership games throughout its history even when it was on top. What microsoft brought to the consoles was online play but they also brought negative stuff like making consumers pay for online and charging for add-ons. Microsoft was bad for the console consumer because they are used to monopolizing markets for example Windows. They were too profit driven instead of support their console to the end (xbox 360), they were quick to abandon it after they won..If Microsoft took Sonys position, i guarantee you there would be less exclusives, less innovation, and more charges for everything under the sun.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
47,823
Reputation
4,132
Daps
72,176
Reppin
Michigan
Having a monopoly in console gaming isn't good for the consumer period. Microsoft forced Sony to do things they had no interest in doing. You saw the PS2's online. Sony didn't care about online like that. They were content letting the developers sort that out. PSN as it exist today was a response to Xbox Live.

Even with this backwards compatibility. There's no reason you need to rebuy the games if you already own them but at this point Sony no longer has any real competition. They own the market so they'll do as they see fit.

A lot of people here don't remember the anti-used games patents Sony had. Microsoft made the move first and the market shunned them and Sony dropped it like it was hot.

A lot of you don't wanna give credit where credit is due but the end user experience you know of today and probably take fro granted on a console, Microsoft pushed most of that. Nintendo and Sony had zero interest in creating a unified gaming system and platform online. If it was left up to Sony I guarantee EA and Ubisoft especially would have created their own online services for their own games and they probably would have charged you for them.
 

King Sun

Big Boss
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
33,139
Reputation
4,183
Daps
81,265
Reppin
323,904,480,817,614
Having a monopoly in console gaming isn't good for the consumer period. Microsoft forced Sony to do things they had no interest in doing. You saw the PS2's online. Sony didn't care about online like that. They were content letting the developers sort that out. PSN as it exist today was a response to Xbox Live.

Even with this backwards compatibility. There's no reason you need to rebuy the games if you already own them but at this point Sony no longer has any real competition. They own the market so they'll do as they see fit.

A lot of people here don't remember the anti-used games patents Sony had. Microsoft made the move first and the market shunned them and Sony dropped it like it was hot.

A lot of you don't wanna give credit where credit is due but the end user experience you know of today and probably take fro granted on a console, Microsoft pushed most of that. Nintendo and Sony had zero interest in creating a unified gaming system and platform online. If it was left up to Sony I guarantee EA and Ubisoft especially would have created their own online services for their own games and they probably would have charged you for them.
I honestly believe its more to do with how they looked at the American market at that time and our infrastructure when it came to high speed internet than the interest of not doing it.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
47,823
Reputation
4,132
Daps
72,176
Reppin
Michigan
I honestly believe its more to do with how they looked at the American market at that time and our infrastructure when it came to high speed internet than the interest of not doing it.
They came out first. They could have done it first. For whatever reason they elected not to. A console from a competitor comes out year later and down the line does it. Suddenly Sony is doing it to after that fact.
 

ORDER_66

I dont care anymore 2026
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
149,537
Reputation
16,935
Daps
592,858
Reppin
Queens,NY
:dahell:

Xbox is more successful than it's ever been


O5v0vcq.gif
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,788
Reputation
8,200
Daps
113,163
They came out first. They could have done it first. For whatever reason they elected not to. A console from a competitor comes out year later and down the line does it. Suddenly Sony is doing it to after that fact.
At that time couch MP was very popular so online gaming on consoles wasn't really "big" yet. Hell, I didn't get my first computer until 2004 and I didn't start gaming online until 2006-7ish. I'd give Sony the benefit of the doubt here and say that they simply wasn't focused on that. Microsoft coming out with a online structure first seems more like a most likely to happen scenario.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,788
Reputation
8,200
Daps
113,163
They've never "won" the console war.

Came in third twice, they are now solidly in second place. Xbox one selling better than 360, first party games bringing in the most revenue ever, Xbox live subscriptions continue to rise.

Only thing they aren't doing is beating PS4 :manny:
I'm guessing that's due to the more prevalent DLC and microtrans this gen as opposed to them being not existent so much last gen.
 

Dotcom

OnAComUP
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
2,646
Reputation
-620
Daps
3,554
So basically The PS4 outsold the Xbox with only Uncharted remake as ammunition against Halo 5, Tomb raider 2, and like 50 bundles. Microsoft practically giving away Xbox with 3 games during their Super Bowl most important time of the year and still count beat an Uncharted remake bundle. Guys I'm not even talking about world sales but American sales. Think about that for a second. Do they have any hope next year. Geez.
:francis::mjlol:
 
Top