SwagKingKong
All Star
Why are you speaking as if these arguments aren't more applicable to Kidd?
You can't just group them in the same box as if they were "inefficient" with similar production/impact - if you missed it the first time -
Kidd averaged 12.6 ppg on 40% shooting (50% TS) during the regular season (36 minutes per game) and 12.9 ppg on 39% shooting (49% TS) during the postseason for his career with peaks of 16.9ppg/10.2 apg and 18.7 ppg/8.9 assists.
Zeke averaged 19.2 ppg on 45% shooting (51% TS) during the regular season (36 minutes per game) and 20.4 ppg on 44% shooting (52% TS) during the postseason for his career with peaks of 22.9 ppg/7.8 apg, 21.3 ppg/11.1 apg, 21.2 ppg/13.9 apg and 20.9 ppg/10.8 apg.
That's like saying Westbrook and Jrue are "inefficient offensively" - failing to take into account the difference in workload and production.
Kidd didn't make up the impact-difference on the defensive end (let alone surpass Zeke), especially since he played on a slow-paced team with a help-orientated scheme in NJ. His reputation long outlasted his defensive impact; not to mention he was never that great to begin with. Kidd isn't even on Zeke's level, I don't see how any reasonable person could argue this.
You're making my point, both are inefficient and Kidd understood this by not trying to score alot. ITs volume hurts his case for being better. I dont want someone inefficient going for 20 pts per game.
Kidd definitely made up the difference defensively. Look at his adjusted plus minus stats, his defensive value makes him a top player for multiple years.