So we've found the cure for cancer???

[Brooklynzson]

That's dope to hear man. My dad is going through a battle with this extremely rare form of skin cancer and it's not looking good. The initial chemo worked, they went to trail/experimental stuff and it did little to nothing.

shyt isn't easy to go through, so props.

Sorry to hear that bro, i really hope something works and he pulls through.

 

[concise]

You guys need to slow down with this money is in the treatment and not in the cure stuff and docs wanting to keep you stuck on medication. That may be true for things like diabetes, hypertension, and those things, but I don't think you guys understand how dangerous cancers can be and how toxic some of these drugs are. This is not diabetes where this can be managed. not. at. all.

Looking up this antineoplaston stuff, there's no way this things has been under wraps for this long to be effective. I'd hate to be the one to say come on at one of these videos but ... come on, brehs. 30 years and it's still an experimental treatment and hasn't made much publicity past a youtube video? This here is just playing on your fears of the unknown worlds of cancer and the common hatred of big business.


I know we all hate big business and the fact that sometimes treatments don't work as expected, but the fact remains, the modern system we have is not being hampered by not approving some of these things. Experimental trials that work eventually get the "experimental" tags removed from them. Fact.

No cancer doctor/center is going to want to keep you around and hooked. They all want you to live and get out because that is actually much better publicity for them. Much better.

 

[Melt_Man]

You guys need to slow down with this money is in the treatment and not in the cure stuff and docs wanting to keep you stuck on medication. That may be true for things like diabetes, hypertension, and those things, but I don't think you guys understand how dangerous cancers can be and how toxic some of these drugs are. This is not diabetes where this can be managed. not. at. all.

Looking up this antineoplaston stuff, there's no way this things has been under wraps for this long to be effective. I'd hate to be the one to say come on at one of these videos but ... come on, brehs. 30 years and it's still an experimental treatment and hasn't made much publicity past a youtube video? This here is just playing on your fears of the unknown worlds of cancer and the common hatred of big business.


I know we all hate big business and the fact that sometimes treatments don't work as expected, but the fact remains, the modern system we have is not being hampered by not approving some of these things. Experimental trials that work eventually get the "experimental" tags removed from them. Fact.

No cancer doctor/center is going to want to keep you around and hooked. They all want you to live and get out because that is actually much better publicity for them. Much better.

If i remember correctly they are doing patient studies using the treatment in Japan so it will be interesting what comes from that, because you always have to approach claims like those with healthy skepticism.

 

[cheek100]

coli run it!!

 

[jadillac]

remember that Chris Rock joke from that

"They money is not in the cure...the money is in the medicine.....that's all the govt is, a bunch of muthaf'n drug dealers on the comeback"

EDIT: foudn it



honestly, until I see Presidents or multiple other prominent officials die of cancer, then I'll believe they dont have a cure

 

[woodblock]

Looking up this antineoplaston stuff, there's no way this things has been under wraps for this long to be effective. I'd hate to be the one to say come on at one of these videos but ... come on, brehs. 30 years and it's still an experimental treatment and hasn't made much publicity past a youtube video? This here is just playing on your fears of the unknown worlds of cancer and the common hatred of big business.

Burzynski is a fraud preying on the desperate. Shame on him.

 

[newworldafro]

You guys need to slow down with this money is in the treatment and not in the cure stuff and docs wanting to keep you stuck on medication. That may be true for things like diabetes, hypertension, and those things, but I don't think you guys understand how dangerous cancers can be and how toxic some of these drugs are. This is not diabetes where this can be managed. not. at. all.

Looking up this antineoplaston stuff, there's no way this things has been under wraps for this long to be effective. I'd hate to be the one to say come on at one of these videos but ... come on, brehs. 30 years and it's still an experimental treatment and hasn't made much publicity past a youtube video? This here is just playing on your fears of the unknown worlds of cancer and the common hatred of big business.


I know we all hate big business and the fact that sometimes treatments don't work as expected, but the fact remains, the modern system we have is not being hampered by not approving some of these things. Experimental trials that work eventually get the "experimental" tags removed from them. Fact.

No cancer doctor/center is going to want to keep you around and hooked. They all want you to live and get out because that is actually much better publicity for them. Much better.

Burzynski is a fraud preying on the desperate. Shame on him.

..... Let me guess neither one of you WATCHED THE ENTIRE video and now calling ......

If you actually WATCH it show patients being cured or least vastly improved state of health, why would he continuously be sued, blocked, have patent stolen front of him for the whole world to see......why would he be expereincing all this if he was a fraud and curing people for 20+ years..........

You can't be serious.....of course NBC, FOX and CBS ARE NOT going to talk about this...why would they, you know how much them pharmaceutical advertisements generate for them???.......

Yall can't be serious calling dude a fraud........??


Remember they DO NOT TEST GMO FOOD.......GMO Food they are given a waiver called GRAS = Generally Regarded As Safe......this means that it will not be tested until it is discoverd that it could harmful....

PBS - harvest of fear: viewpoints: are gm foods sufficiently regulated in the u.s.? should there be mandatory labelling?

Explain the concept of GRAS.
Under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, food additives--things like spices and flavors and preservatives, sweeteners--are required to be approved by FDA before they can be used in food.

The definition of a food additive does have exemptions for substances that are Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). Congress, in enacting the requirement for food additives, recognized there were many substances that had been safely used in food, and did not want a pre-market review of all of those substances, such as sugar and vinegar and so forth. They also said that there could be scientific information, if it's generally recognized in the scientific community that the use of the substance is safe in food, that would be exempt from the pre-market approval requirement.

So we have a large class of substances--enzymes, many flavors, and many common food substances such as vinegar and sugar and salt and pepper and so forth--that are added to food but do not undergo pre-market approval because they are generally recognized as safe.

This could apply to genetically engineered enzymes, for example?

Yes. FDA has said that in looking at modifications by genetic engineering, there can be new substances in the food, such as a protein or an enzyme. To the extent that those substances are similar to proteins or enzymes that we have consumed safely, we would consider those to be essentially similar to substances that have been accepted as GRAS, and so we will not require pre-market approval for those substances.We do have the legal tool to require pre-market approval if genetic modification is used to introduce a substance that's very different [and] we don't have a basis to believe that that substance is generally recognized as safe. ...

So a potato is a potato is a potato, if it's not checked.
Yes. There is the possibility that someone could change the potato in a way that would be significantly different. If, for example, through gene technology, a protein were introduced that was very different from proteins that we've safely consumed, FDA has authority to require pre-market approval for that protein as a food additive. ...

Now lets come back to this picture here....of the Russian study done just a few months ago of rats eating only GMO foods.... and finishing the study looking like some CGI produced rats from an alien horror flick.

Revealed: Monsanto GM corn caused tumors in rats — RT

 

[woodblock]

Yall can't be serious calling dude a fraud........??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burzynski_Clinic#Efficacy

The consensus among the professional community, as represented by the American Cancer Society[19] and Cancer Research UK[20] among others, is that antineoplaston therapy is unproven, the Burzynski clinic is expensive, and the overall probability of the treatment turning out to be as claimed is low due to lack of credible mechanisms and the poor state of research after more than 35 years of investigation. At the same time, while the antineoplaston therapy is marketed as being non-toxic and an alternative to chemotherapy, it is in fact a form of chemotherapy and there are known side effects.[21]

The clinical efficacy of antineoplaston combinations for various diseases has been the subject of many such trials by Burzynski and his associates, but these have not produced any clear evidence of efficacy. There is no convincing evidence from randomized controlled trials in the scientific literature that antineoplastons are useful treatments of cancer, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved these products for the treatment of any disease.[7] The American Cancer Society has stated since 1983 that there is no evidence that antineoplastons have any beneficial effects in cancer and recommended that people do not buy these products since there could be serious health consequences to patients who use this therapy.[12][19] A 2004 medical review described antioneoplaston treatment as a "disproven therapy."[22]
In 1998, three prominent oncologists were enlisted by the weekly Washington newsletter The Cancer Letter to conduct independent reviews of Burzynski's clinical trial research on antineoplastons. They concluded that the studies were poorly designed, not interpretable, and "so flawed that it cannot be determined whether it really works". One of them characterized the research as "scientific nonsense".[23] In addition to questioning Burzynski's research methods, the oncologists found significant and possibly life-threatening toxicity in some patients treated with antineoplastons.[24]
Independent scientists have been unable to reproduce the positive results reported in Burzynski's studies: the National Cancer Institute has observed that researchers other than Burzynski and his associates have not been successful in duplicating his results,[11] and Cancer Research UK states that “available scientific evidence does not support claims that antineoplaston therapy is effective in treating or preventing cancer.”[20]

 

[The Nigerian]

There is no cure for cancer, idiots.

 

[newworldafro]

Burzynski Clinic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let's say hypothetically he was unsuccessful???.....What is the point of shutting down his SCIENTIFIC METHODS for going about EXPERIMENTING....why would he get this much flack???? It's counterintuitive is it not if we are being truthful and trying to protect peoples's health....

And as far as organizations proclaiming a study is a fraud..........they've already sent out the scientific goons on this rat study too.....


"Scientists Smell A Rat In Fraudulent Genetic Engineering Study"
Scientists Smell A Rat In Fraudulent Genetic Engineering Study - Forbes



^^^ So since after recieving this flack giving from "esteemed" scientists saying that the methodology was wrong, these particular rats are more susceptible to cancer anyway, and so on so forth...guess what kind of GMO study will be conducted next with these rats....................

"Rat Reality Show: Russian Scientists To Broadcast GMO Experiment"
Rat Reality Show: Russian Scientists To Broadcast GMO Experiment

That's right a 24 hour reality show with this GMO rat experiment for the whole world to see......................this going be some shiit....

There is no cure for cancer, idiots.

and that's your final answer with no evidence??? or anything to back it up.....

..... at least try to debate breh, I know it Sunday and all, but don't come in here, without a lil bit of intelligence.........

 

[woodblock]

Let's say hypothetically he was unsuccessful???.....What is the point of shutting down his SCIENTIFIC METHODS for going about EXPERIMENTING....why would he get this much flack???? It's counterintuitive is it not if we are being truthful and trying to protect peoples's health....

The guy has been "experimenting" for 35 years. He calls it "experimenting" as a way to get around the fact that his "treatments" would never be approved if he tried to bring them to market in the normal way. Because there's no evidence that they work, outside of the stuff the guy himself has published. You don't think that's kind of suspicious? How much money do you think he's making off selling false hope to people with a terminal illness? What does it cost for a course of treatment in his clinic - a couple of hundred grand out of pocket, isn't it?

 

[woodblock]

what makes me smh about this kind of conspiracy theory is that to believe it you really have to think that 99% of cancer doctors, researchers, scientists are evil or stupid. All those thousands and thousands of people who dedicated their lives to helping those with cancer and they don't want to speak up about a cure because they're too greedy? Are you sure?

 

[newworldafro]

what makes me smh about this kind of conspiracy theory is that to believe it you really have to think that 99% of cancer doctors, researchers, scientists are evil or stupid. All those thousands and thousands of people who dedicated their lives to helping those with cancer and they don't want to speak up about a cure because they're too greedy? Are you sure?

Did you just come out the womb last month or something breh.......????

Breh, we arresting people for smoking a plant, based off of the history that show's propaganda banned its legality based on race, false concepts of its capabilities and because it woul DESTROY the profits of the paper and chemical industries..............you know what that plant is called.......it's called cannabis...and SINCE 1937, 10s of millions of GOOD PEOPLE have worked in industries that perpuate the myth that it is an evil specimen...when its just evil to a few people's revenues.....

Stop it breh.

So do yo believe those scientist that say GMO is not dangerous??? Are they being truthful??... I just explained what GRAS was....???



Everything in the medical industry is an experiment.... Do you have any evidence of his success rate?? How much do cancer treatments cost already.??...motherfockers going broke left and right over cancer treatments...what in tarnation are you talking about expensive treatments??? ....

I don't know his success rates either....still please help me understand, what is he doing so EVIL that any other trained licensed medical researcher is not doing??........ PLEASE BREAKDOWN IT for this NIAVE POSTER ??...

 

[Mr. 1nighter]

We have some weirdos man...

lol at niccas getting cured at the local GNC

Cut it out!

 

[woodblock]

Did you just come out the womb last month or something breh.......????

I thought we were talking about Burzynski here. I don't know about GMO so I won't speak about that but I do know a little about this Burzynski dude and I call it like I see it. There are plenty of scientists willing to say cannabis isn't that harmful so I don't really see how the legality of cannabis comes into it, it's not like there is some big conspiracy of scientists to keep cannabis illegal.