So when did being the best loser become more valuable than winning it all?

[Lord_Chief_Rocka]

Okay? Jordan quit at 30. The most competitive man of them all according to y'all. Quit. Imagine the threads if Lebron quit in 2014

He retired

 

[delta]

This is the same era where a man averaged a triple double for a season and nerds couldn't type fast enough that it's the most overrated stat. Also, one title in Cleveland equaled 2 or 3 anywhere else. It's like living in an alternate universe

i love it when u dumb n1kkas ruin a argument's premise

do people see KD's future tiltes in Golden St. the same as 1 in OKC? obviously not

should the difference 2 rebounds per game determine the MVP race between two PGs? no

 

[Lucky_Lefty]

i love it when u dumb n1kkas ruin a argument's premise

do people see KD's future tiltes in Golden St. the same as 1 in OKC? obviously not

should the difference 2 rebounds per game determine the MVP race between two PGs? no

But I wasn't speaking about KD you simple ass nikka. Go play somewhere

 

[ThaGlow]

I don't get why people even push that 6-0 shyt, the more impressive accomplishment imo was the two 3-peats.

If it was 6-0 but every other year, he might catch shyt the Spurs get "not a dynasty without back to back chips". Which I disagree with btw.

 

[Pimp]

So OP was lying this whole time.

Lebron haters always nervous as fukk round playoff time.




So Jordan was going to win something in 1986 if only he hadn't gotten hurt.

Jordan was fresher than everyone else and averaged 30-7-5 in the playoffs in 1995, but it doesn't count because he missed the first half of the regular season.

Jordan's last two years don't count even tho he playing 35 min/game, but Lebron's teenage years count.

Ya'all big on the excuses.

young dummies

 

[MalikX]

so where does your analogy leave MJ getting bounced from the playoffs? getting cockblocked by her friends?

i dont think im ever gonna understand why losing in the first round is better than losing in the finals your goal every season is to win the finals. if you dont win the finals, then you lost that season. if bron gets 6 rings, he has more conference championships

edit: but i dont see why 3/7 is better yet :hovtrump: who the fukk is saying that? im assuming we're talking about 6/10 compared to 6/6

Your goal is to WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS not to come in second place

You nikkas trying to give consolation prizes for the years he ALMOST MADE IT

If people really believed this logic than why is the Golden State Warriors 73-9 Season looked down on?

So back in High School when you and people from your rival school was talking about Conference Football Championships, they'd be like: "We won 3 state titles the last five years chump you'd be like "Yea, so....we won 1 state title but five semi-conference titles. You nikkas were trash the other 2 years and didn't make the playoffs Who says this breh? Who uses this argument in real life?

 

[the cac mamba]

Your goal is to WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS not to come in second place

You nikkas trying to give consolation prizes for the years he ALMOST MADE IT

If people really believed this logic than why is the Golden State Warriors 73-9 Season looked down on?

So back in High School when you and people from your rival school was talking about Conference Football Championships, they'd be like: "We won 3 state titles the last five years chump you'd be like "Yea, so....we won 1 state title but five semi-conference titles. You nikkas were trash the other 2 years and didn't make the playoffs Who says this breh? Who uses this argument in real life?

like i said, anyone who's saying 3 outta 7 is better than 6 outa 6 is a retard

what IM saying is that at age 32, jordan and lebron both achieved 3 rings thats dead even to me

 

[MalikX]

like i said, anyone who's saying 3 outta 7 is better than 6 outa 6 is a retard

what IM saying is that at age 32, jordan and lebron both achieved 3 rings thats dead even to me

Jordan played 13 seasons with Chicago. He won 6 rings. He won it in a dominating fashion and won it without jumping teams.
LeBron has played 14 seasons now. He won 3 rings. He struggled in multiple Finals and had to form a superteam to get a couple of them.

There is no argument you can use here breh If LeBron loses two more Finals, he matches Jordan's championship rings in Finals losses That's not a PLUS no matter how hard yall try to spin it. Back in the day that was called being a Choker.

 

[KillbertArenas]

I don't believe that is the argument at all. The argument is it's better to make the Finals (regardless of win/lose) than not make the Finals at all. Going to the Finals seven times and only winning three titles (3-4) is still a better accomplishment than going to three Finals' and winning them all (3-0). Being 3-0 in the Finals just means you and your team weren't good enough to make it to another FOUR Finals', and lost earlier in the playoffs. It's simple. I don't know why we need to keep going over this.

I believe thats the narative that the threadstarter is mentioning...

Regardless of how you spin it 3-7 is never better than 6-0

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I believe thats the narative that the threadstarter is mentioning...

Regardless of how you spin it 3-4 is never better than 6-0

 

[KillbertArenas]

You must work for the Trump press team

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You must work for the Trump press team

What in the fukk are you even talking about? I suggest you go and read through the thread properly.

 

[KillbertArenas]

What in the fukk are you even talking about? I suggest you go and read through the thread properly.

i did fool...

Stop with your stupid attempt at spinning the narrative Lebrons finals record is anything close to what Jordan pulled up..

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

i did fool...

Stop with your attempt at spinning the narrative Lebrons finals record is anything close to what Jordan pulled up..

SMFH.

 

[fifth column]

3-4 is 3-4 no voodoo or headless chicken can make it 6-0