Charisma- deficiency aside, both Roman and Cesaro look believable via workrate as credible opponents to Brock....they just both lack the connection to the crowd but they both look the part
Roman has no pedigree or workrate to be viewed as the guy to beat lesnar.
Caesaro would be a good choice to beat lesnar but since the WWE does not build via actual workrate or mat based psychology.
Establishing the psychology that caesaro would win the WWE is not vested in to work.
The only time wwe made any strides to establish workrate in the past twenty years was jettisoned.
when hbk and hhh were carried by Benoit and were made to look like amateurs' verse Kurt angle.
Which is why workrate was not re-established but should have been when Daniel Bryan assailed up the card.
Instead we have a disjointed product and company built far and away from the main concept and scope of what the business should entail. Which is only there as a factor because the product leaves itself open.
so the son-in-law can justify his part time dominate the entire promotion on the card slot.
When, the company would be more compelling to show workrate and create vignettes.
that build up hhh's attention to workrate if he came back
In the same manner they show hhh at cross fit gyms.
to ensure us levesque does not blow another quad and become diesel/kevin Nash everytime he comes down the ramp.
Yet, since this company is inept.
We get a product lacking this because they also don't want to show their hand because then the question would be asked.
As to why other stars were not built up in this manner.
Which defeats the while idea of the brassring rant and makes them look to grasp more straws.
than the usual bundle of straws they pull from aimlessly. Which descends into the promotion having no direction or scope when hhh is not on the roster.
Art Barr
and out of it I don't think so.
@ this thread why do you nikkas even watch at this point.
Like he gives a fukk about you nikkas booing or whatever struggle chants will come of this.
.
