Social Experiment Shows That Blacks Are Still Mentally Enslaved!
- Thread starter Pdiddy
- Start date
Wrong forum.
Oh really? Enlighten me Mr.High IQ.OP is as dumb as the dude who made the video
didn't mean to sound uppity bruh...But the fact that i would have to explain to you how stupid it is should be proof enough
But fact that i would have to explain to you how stupid it is should be proof enough
See, that's why I don't even bother to address most ignorant motherfukkers like you.
HacksawJimThuggin
All Star
that video is dumb.
No its not ignorant. You don't have to waste 10mn watching a video to know that a lot of people would pick Jesus. Whether Jesus is white or not should be irrelevant . The stark contrast between white Jesus and Black historical figures is only used to accentuate his stupid point.
i.e See how he picked black and white pictures for the black figures and Color for the "white jesus"? Dude accomplished his goal though, he get people to eat his bullshyt up and generate views on his dumb Youtube video.
You can't expect people to behave rationally when religion is involved.
Its the same reason why a mother of 3 would rather starve for a week and donate her paycheck to her local pastor rather than feed her kids.
this good enuff for u?
Last edited:
Considering the fact that jesus wasnt alive to have actual photographs taken of him, most depictions are gonna be in color because they tend to be romanticized portraits and neither Garvey nor Malcolm was around when color photographs was a common thing, most of their pictures are likely to be black n white. Its also a fact that most jesus depictions have him being white.
So is he stupid or is he just showing things as theyre typically portrayed?
1)Experimenter's bias
2) Was jesus around when color photography became a common thing? And yes color photography was common around the 60s.
His whole point is about "white jesus" not religion. You want to know why his point is not about religion rather than white jesus? because he most likely follows a religion too which would make his point kinda
The dude in the video should put a random cracker versus Jesus to prove his point. Cracker knew exactly what he was doing. Didn't need to watch the video to know that.
Of course he's somewhat bias...thats obvious..but the color differences in the pics likely arent a result of bias. Even if there was zero bias and photos were picked at random, thats what youll likely see. Color pictures of Garvey/Malcolm, black and white pictures of Jesus and depictions of jesus as black are three things that are all objectively unlikely. They exist but theyre exceptions. Google all three people, go to images and see what mostly pops up. We cant expect him to be an expert of methodology...but he just happens to be right. Whether hes talking about religion or race, hes still right.1)Experimenter's bias
2) Was jesus around when color photography became a common thing? And yes color photography was common around the 60s.
His whole point is about "white jesus" not religion. You want to know why his point is not about religion rather than white jesus? because he most likely follows a religion too which would make his point kinda
Agree with ur religion point tho...
made it 6 seconds in and i cant 
goddamn, we are doomed. got us worshipping their false white god over real black activist. bet majority of them come from single mothers, even tho a lot of grown ass nikkas are brainwashed too
just disgusting.
goddamn, we are doomed. got us worshipping their false white god over real black activist. bet majority of them come from single mothers, even tho a lot of grown ass nikkas are brainwashed toojust disgusting.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 31,918
- Reputation
- -10,513
- Daps
- 21,997
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
But you do need the white man to tell you how to think
I'm just gonna throw something out there that might amaze you. White people thru-out history have a knack for getting people to hate themselves. Redskin is a slur because Redskin is bad.
****** was a word white ppl used back when they began to acquire black folk from Africa, correct?
Here's the million dollar question, do you think White ppl made up the name
In the year 1694 or whatever, not 100% of white ppl in America hated the slaves. Some felt sorry for them
Some even helped them escape, correct?
The ones who helped, when they got back to there house to talk about what they did with other like minded white ppl
Guess what they said
They would go "I helped this ****** get to freedom"It was just the name they used. Now they tell you it don't mean black, it means ignorant. Go look it up in the dictionary
But if a black person is in a room with 100 white ppl and one person says "Hey ******, come here" who you think they talking to?
So ******s are ignorant. But who invented the word? The Naga tribe from Africa taught the Asians about Buddah who's name is Samboa aka Sambo. But we hate little black sambo even tho Asian loves him and his positive message. Something you don't see these days in the c00niacan community these days.
Naga's
In spanish its Negro
We took the power back, but the education on the word still has a long way to go. I'll stop here for now...
That is part of the brainwashing
You see, if what you say is true. Then tell us all why did they ever change it
Let me say that again, you might have missed it. If the color is irrelevant, then why did they change it
Because there was no such thing as a WHITE JESUS until Michelangelo painted one in the year 1498 I believe (somewhere around there)
So for 1500 out of 2000 years Jesus was black. Why the change my dude
Who had it changed anyway? Julius "White Mike Sam" Caesar had it as he expanded the Roman empire
An empire that had an issue with Black Yeshua (jesus) And since the letter J wasn't invented until the 1600's
But now I'm dropping too much knowledge and I'm not supposed to be doing that. I'm a bad poster
Dude in the Vid was black