Kobe was never considered one of the best defensive players in the league. Not rocket science why that is a better gauge of their standing as defensive players.
You don't know shyt about basketball
this is such a strawman argument.
So how are Kobe's sidekick rings weighted then?
Another strawman argument. Any MVP candidate can jump from franchise to franchise and ruin parity by playing with the best competition. Obviously the achievements are all cheap and not earned without tipping the scale. It's easy to achieve when you game the system as we saw with Durant who hasn't done shyt without the warriors. Cheap rings. It was just funny that Durant beat Lebron at his own game and got two final MVPs on his dome
The one time Bean and Lebron were supposed to meet in the finals Bron got packed up Dwight. Kobe got Finals MVP that season

I wish Lebron and Bean played in that finals Kobe would have swept his ass and you know it
So how are Kobe's sidekick rings weighted then?
As
@Sccit and other have shown Kobe was not a sidekick. Shaq and his dynamic was 1A 1B. We never beat the Spurs without bean. Kobe was actually better to the point where Phil told him to dial back at times with his scoring outburst to prevent Shaq from having a toddler tantrum :mjlol. Kobe won two more without shaq which proves that Kobe was always better. Nobody is arguing who had the better career between the two of them anymore. You have such a 2004 argument

. You are making a false equivalence between literally cheating the parity system and winning cheap rings along with cheap accolades. Bringing up Shaq is such a deflection
Plus LeBron had the benefit of playing in the east. He had east coast media bias. Compeition was already weaker in the east those days.
You aren't really arguing anything btw. Your argument is basically "lol Kobe not good defender he got those awards based on reputation". HE was one of the best guard defenders
EVER. He earned everything the right way too

Not cheap and easy like your boy
