- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,411
- Reputation
- -10,651
- Daps
- 22,251
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
In today's episode of Sony Stan mad we'll shine light on this guy. This is what a typical Sony Stan looks like...
Now that is a stock photo of Gizmo Duck, but let me show you what Shawn layden a former Sony exec says about gamepass...

Here's reality tho...
Now that is a stock photo of Gizmo Duck, but let me show you what Shawn layden a former Sony exec says about gamepass...
Uh this nikka can't do basic math and he was high up at SonyLayden, who last year called overall AAA development “not sustainable” and suggested that game length and pricing may have to be adjusted to combat ballooning game budgets, echoed Ryan’s sentiment.
“It’s very hard to launch a $120m game on a subscription service charging $9.99 a month,” he said. “You pencil it out, you’re going to have to have 500 million subscribers before you start to recoup your investment.
“That’s why right now you need to take a loss-leading position to try to grow that base. But still, if you have only 250 million consoles out there, you’re not going to get to half a billion subscribers. So how do you circle that square? Nobody has figured that out yet

Here's reality tho...
Why do Sony gamers mirror their execs intelligence? Cuz they all say the same thingsXbox boss Phil Spencer said last October that the company has no plans to increase the price of the service.
“We like the value that Game Pass is today and from a business model it’s completely sustainable the way it is,” he told the Dropped Frames podcast.
UPDATE: During Microsoft’s quarterly earnings call on Tuesday, CEO Satya Nadella claimed Xbox Games Pass is “growing rapidly”, with subscribers playing approximately 40 percent more games and spending 50 percent more than non-members.



you didn't think that one all the way thru but I hear you and it's easy to assume....
. I like to leave breadcrumbs to keep the conversation going
. Nothing changes and they may still be in the red, because they would still be relying on a set number of subscribers. I'm sure that this is why on top of the monthly fee, games still have to be purchased on Stadia. It's not like Disney who was relying on movies making a billion dollars in the theater, and then make that extra money from Disney+ subscribers, on top of their theme parks and cruises. Or in the case of Amazon, they have Amazon Prime subscribers, who are also buying products on Amazon, on top of AWS. Where is that for Netflix? That's something Microsoft can eat, because their operating system and the Office suite is on the majority of PCs in the world, on top of government and private company contracts and cloud services. They'll make money but are they going to profit?


