UpAndComing
Veteran
It just doesn't make sense to me. An artist in a Group can not be put higher on a Top 10 list than a solo artist. Their body of work is made with another person, while a solo artist stands alone with his own work
If anything, Hip Hop groups should be in their own Top 10 list
1. In a group, you are one entity. Whether in a group of 2, or 3, or 4, fans see you as one act. That's in any genre. In Hip Hop, it's like you're each other's ghostwriter. You can bounce ideas of each other daily on what to write or what to say on your songs. Your ideas are shared in a group setting. The classic verses in a group album are in one thought
2. In a group, there are so many rhymes to go around. Andre had the luxury to be paired with another legendary rapper Big Boi. In a song of 3 verses, you had the luxury of rhyming one verse, and sharing the final verse with Big Boi. Andre never had to make a song with 3 full verses all by himself. How the hell do we know how he would hold up in an album with 15 full length songs of all 3 verses of his own?. Busta explains it well
Starts at 5:20
3. No artists that are/were part of a group ever received top 10 status till they put out a string of solo albums. Anyone in the Wu-Tang would not have been thought of as Top 10 had they not have put out an album of they're own. Ghostface wouldn't have been there without IronMan, Supreme Clientele, Fishscale, etc etc. Prodigy is a great example also. In a legendary group Mobb Deep, but now thought of as a Top 10 rapper cause of his classic debut solo album in 2000, H.N.I.C., plus his other works. You think Micheal Jackson would be who he is, if he was still on the Jackson 5?
4. This is not to say that Andre 3000 couldn't have been successful going solo, but he sacrificed him becoming Top 10 status by being in a group. Outkast as a group are deff Top 10 status, obviously. But as it is now, sorry Andre ain't in the discussion. There's still time for Andre to put out a string of solo albums, no one's stopping him
If anything, Hip Hop groups should be in their own Top 10 list
1. In a group, you are one entity. Whether in a group of 2, or 3, or 4, fans see you as one act. That's in any genre. In Hip Hop, it's like you're each other's ghostwriter. You can bounce ideas of each other daily on what to write or what to say on your songs. Your ideas are shared in a group setting. The classic verses in a group album are in one thought
2. In a group, there are so many rhymes to go around. Andre had the luxury to be paired with another legendary rapper Big Boi. In a song of 3 verses, you had the luxury of rhyming one verse, and sharing the final verse with Big Boi. Andre never had to make a song with 3 full verses all by himself. How the hell do we know how he would hold up in an album with 15 full length songs of all 3 verses of his own?. Busta explains it well
Starts at 5:20
3. No artists that are/were part of a group ever received top 10 status till they put out a string of solo albums. Anyone in the Wu-Tang would not have been thought of as Top 10 had they not have put out an album of they're own. Ghostface wouldn't have been there without IronMan, Supreme Clientele, Fishscale, etc etc. Prodigy is a great example also. In a legendary group Mobb Deep, but now thought of as a Top 10 rapper cause of his classic debut solo album in 2000, H.N.I.C., plus his other works. You think Micheal Jackson would be who he is, if he was still on the Jackson 5?

4. This is not to say that Andre 3000 couldn't have been successful going solo, but he sacrificed him becoming Top 10 status by being in a group. Outkast as a group are deff Top 10 status, obviously. But as it is now, sorry Andre ain't in the discussion. There's still time for Andre to put out a string of solo albums, no one's stopping him
Last edited: