You keep saying I'm using anecdotal evidence, but how much of the world have you actually seen as a grown man with 3 kids that doesn't work? And I'm not saying that as a diss, I had my son mad young and it definitely limited my experiences for a while.
You operate on this assumption that all people that are well off must steal it from others and it's not always the case.
If someone gave me and you $1000 apiece and tracked us for a month and I take my 1000 and buy a half a pound of weed and slow roll it to you an 8th at a time, and at the end of the month I have 1800 and you only have 200, was a crime committed? Do I have to give you 1800 instead of 1000 to compensate for your choices?
As far as places to help, they already exist. If a person wants to go there are plenty of programs to help addicts get on their feet. Do we hire people to round them up and force them to get treatment?
And as far as safety nets I'm all for them, but I believe the end goal should be to position people to where they can operate independently, like aid tied to job training programs and nutrition classes. Not for the government to take care of people their entire life like they're overgrown children.
And you might not like to hear it, but there are biological differences in people. Some are more prone to addiction, some people are compulsive liars, some people are drawn to risky behavior, some people are just boring. Some people are innate geniuses, some are dumb as a box of rocks. Most of us are somewhere in the middle.
There is no one size fits all solution without seriously infringing on people's rights.