Pacers are talented and deep as fukk. Are you not watching the games. Not only that but they have guys who are basically unicorns in Pascal Siakam and Myles Turner. Pascal Siakam is a star player that's taken a back seat on a deep team. Sure his game is unorthodox and not really pleasing on the eyes but his combination of speed and length make him elite in the NBA. Then you have Myles Turner who's an elite 3pt shooter and a shot blocker at 7ft tall with great size and strength. Nembhard is a high IQ player who is shockingly clutch. Mathurin can give you 25 pts any day he wants to, he shot 46 percent this season. Nesmith is a good 3D guy. McConnell off the bench another high IQ player who's a scrappy defender and Obi Toppin who's an uber athlete.
Really the only thing Pacers might be lacking is a true superstar player. I just don't see how they'll get past Boston without one.
I am watching games and Pacers are facing injured teams. Bucks were playing without Dame pretty much, whatever version of him they had was nowhere near his peak form.
And Cavs were missing Garland + 2 other starters from game 2.
This does not make Pacers trash or anything, like you said their roster is deep (otherwise they wouldn't have made the comeback in game 2). I'm simply stating a fact that they been facing injured teams, just like last year when they beat those same injured Bucks and went through Knicks series where multiple Knicks players got injured (to be fair Pacers were missing Mathurin last year but still a lesser of a loss than what Knicks and Bucks were missing).
And yes Pacers need a true superstar, but they won't get one because they play in a small market team that's never attracted big free agents. Haliburton could definitely be a great 2nd option to a true superstar as he's not a selfish player.