god, the holy spirit and jesus are one in the same, so jesus hit it too, yep his own mother
part of the reason why christianity is pure![]()

when i hear/debate with Christians,they always fumble between allegorical/some weird
ish of literalism,but they claim to live out thee word,a virtual impossibility within itself,but hey
( no
to me my more conservative christians i'm cool with)this is one one part of Westernized Christianity/CACtholicism i confess towhen i hear/debate with Christians,they always fumble between allegorical/some weird
ish of literalism,but they claim to live out thee word,a virtual impossibility within itself,but hey
its really pure symbolism/numerology/ancient Paganism/Tibetan Buddhism allegory,and thee physical aspect was just "borrowed" from Khemet(Ausar/Aset/Heru or even before that Amun Re Ptah) and Sumerian Mythology (Anu/Enki/Enlil),and i'm sure you can incorporate Hinduism (Brahma/Vishnu/Shiva) depending on your beliefs of Yeshua's childhood/travails and his after death escape( no
to me my more conservative christians i'm cool with)
you're pretty smart,
you should read the chapter about the last supper (John 13) in the king james version
it details jesus getting naked and washing his disciples feet, and then instructing them to do likewise
and then jesus's gay lover seducing him in order to find out which disciple would betray him
the new testament is littered with this kinda shyt
more of the reasons christianity is bs
on thee New Testament to begin with,i've read most,if not all the New Testament(in'shallah)and i'm pretty sure i did in my youth,but i'll go back and re-read it with my "new" eye(s)/mindset and re interpret it,but i'm sure a lot of it will be allegorical towards antiquity,plus who knows what paganism Rome injected(and inversely omitted) into thee New Testament after the Nicene Council convened&basically played judge,jury,executioner on its contents..i was quite perplexed when i heard one of the GMS brovas in Frisco proclaim that Constantine was a Moor,but it theoretically could make sense,i'd have to connect dots/lines on when thee Moors ran Europe&see if it coincides when Constantine was Sol Invictusi'm iffyon thee New Testament to begin with,i've read most,if not all the New Testament(in'shallah)and i'm pretty sure i did in my youth,but i'll go back and re-read it with my "new" eye(s)/mindset and re interpret it,but i'm sure a lot of it will be allegorical towards antiquity,plus who knows what paganism Rome injected(and inversely omitted) into thee New Testament after the Nicene Council convened&basically played judge,jury,executioner on its contents..i was quite perplexed when i heard one of the GMS brovas in Frisco proclaim that Constantine was a Moor,but it theoretically could make sense,i'd have to connect dots/lines on when thee Moors ran Europe&see if it coincides when Constantine was Sol Invictus
do Moors/Hebrews clash on this potential fact..? anyone in thee know feel free to chime in,each one teach one...
girl's info.
now.