Spin: Why Is The USA So Dominant In The Olympics?

superunknown23

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,867
Reputation
1,230
Daps
23,433
Reppin
NULL
Population size is meaningless. India has about 4 times more people but it's completely absent on the medals table.
You need a combination of many things: money, size, diversity (ethnic, geographic/climate), general public interest and strong patriotism.
 

Miggs

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
41,951
Reputation
3,398
Daps
83,890
Reppin
T.O.
Most money spent on athletics and training/facilities...add that America sends more athletes than other countries...
 

Miggs

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
41,951
Reputation
3,398
Daps
83,890
Reppin
T.O.
Population size is meaningless. India has about 4 times more people but it's completely absent on the medals table.
You need a combination of many things: money, size, diversity (ethnic, geographic/climate), general public interest and strong patriotism.

India is an exception to the rule.population has alot to do with number of athletes sent and medals won...
 

superunknown23

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,867
Reputation
1,230
Daps
23,433
Reppin
NULL
India is an exception to the rule.population has alot to do with number of athletes sent and medals won...
Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Mexico, Philippines, Vietnam, Egypt, Iran, Thailand, Turkey, Congo, Ethiopia...
They all have larger populations than all European countries (except Russia & Germany), yet they ain't exactly beasting out there:sas1:
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,254
Daps
89,569
India is an exception to the rule.population has alot to do with number of athletes sent and medals won...

Nah
India, Brazil, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Bangladesh are 6 of the 10 most populous nations on earth and all olympic light weights.
China, US, Russia, and Japan are the other 4 nations in the top 10 and only China, US, and Russia are Olympic powerhouses.

Then you look at the Germany, UK, Jamaica , and other nations who have quite a bit of Olympic success and the population argument has no merit.
Its more financing for the olympics games specifically
 

superunknown23

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
7,867
Reputation
1,230
Daps
23,433
Reppin
NULL
Nah
India, Brazil, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Bangladesh are 6 of the 10 most populous nations on earth and all olympic light weights.
China, US, Russia, and Japan are the other 4 nations in the top 10 and only China, US, and Russia are Olympic powerhouses.

Then you look at the Germany, UK, Jamaica , and other nations who have quite a bit of Olympic success and the population argument has no merit.
Its more financing for the olympics games specifically
It's not just money either: Some of those countries only care about 1 or 2 sports (cricket in India/Pakistan/Bangladesh or soccer in Nigeria for example).
Diversity in interests counts too.
 

Saint1

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
9,144
Reputation
1,172
Daps
26,401
Reppin
CA
The
Stronger and larger genetic pool of diversity.

There are over 300 million people from all backgrounds.

only in the US are you going to find a Katie Ledecky and Michael Phelps with a Lebron James and Stephan Curry coming from the same country
There's no one factor but this plays a major role. We got a globally mixed gene pool training in some of the best facilities in the world.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
23,966
Reputation
7,445
Daps
115,486
We're one of the larger countries, we have money and resources for athletes to train and excel in a variety of sports, and we have a significant black athlete population.

Once those West African countries start to properly fund their athletic programs then shyt is going to be lit. I keep noticing that the sprinters from Ivory Coast and Ghana are getting closer and closer to the USA and Jamaica.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,867
Reputation
17,273
Daps
275,776
Reppin
Oakland
regardless of the issues brehs always want to bring up, you live in a country with a high quality of life and stability, time can be spent pursuing, and funding, leisure activities like sports. we're also a more physical culture - like the aussies, kiwi's, etc - we're countries that laud "ruggedness" and "masculinity" and sports comes with the territory. then add in we're a country where women aren't as oppressed and have pressed for equal opportunities (title ix), it's easy to see how we dominate on that side, aint too many countries pumping funding into women's sports the way we do.
 
Top