Spin: Why Is The USA So Dominant In The Olympics?

[TBdaGhost]

The majority of us would rather put a ball in our kids hands than a book.

And now them balls are turning into video screens

 

[mastermind]

Money, sports crazed country, we sent the most athletes to the olympics, big and diverse gene pool, infrastructure, and top notch doping program

 

[Gangstar8]

america cares about many sports
most countries only care about 1-2 sports

 

[Spence]

College programs spit out athletes without even trying. Not many countries have a farm system like we do. Communist countries have the resources but don't have the same gene pool.

400 years of breeding black athletes doesn't hurt either

Hitler was pissed his athletes couldn't compete against us in track and field for this very reason

 

[I.AM.PIFF]

we are clean

No

 

[Poitier]

African Americans

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

lol @ black athletes being the answer when outside of track & bball, we aren't the dominant force in american olympic sports. especially not winter olympics

 

[Poitier]

lol @ black athletes being the answer when outside of track & bball

yes...because Blacks haven't medaled historically in gymnastics, tennis, boxing, martial arts, swimming, lifting, wrestling, triathalon

are you just dumb and wenching on purpose?

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

yes...because Blacks haven't medaled historically in gymnastics, tennis, boxing, martial arts, swimming, lifting, wrestling, triathalon

are you just dumb and wenching on purpose?

do you not understand the word dominant? as in we don't dominate those fields - yes, you have a biles/douglas, williams sisters, simone manuel, etc. that come along every now and then - and it's a big deal when they do. but of all the medals the US wins - blacks are not the dominant force nor majority in most of those fields. stop being obtuse idiot.

 

[Poitier]

do you not understand the word dominant? as in we don't dominate those fields - yes, you have a biles/douglas, williams sisters, simone manuel, etc. that come along every now and then .

No, its not "every now and then", wench. AAs comprise a large chunk of the medal count especially relative to their population size in America. Now gives us your wenchism as to why a sizable Black population isn't what allows America to gain the edge over rivals and dominate

 

[bogey_j]

do you not understand the word dominant? as in we don't dominate those fields - yes, you have a biles/douglas, williams sisters, simone manuel, etc. that come along every now and then - and it's a big deal when they do. but of all the medals the US wins - blacks are not the dominant force nor majority in most of those fields. stop being obtuse idiot.

its best not to argue with fools breh; its just a waste of time.

 

[Poitier]

its best not to argue with fools breh; its just a waste of time.

Agreed, especially when you're a white passive aggressive p*ssy.

 

[IllmaticDelta]

best athletes + diverse racially which factors into what field(s) certain groups dominate in

 

[J Money]

The amount of funding is a big reason. Its the reason UK finished with the 1 gold in 1996, 20 years later they have 67. They put massive funding into th sports and it paid off. The level of athletes as well, you got world class athletes all over the us.

 

[Mr swag]

America has the resources to train at a high level. There is a reason why super powers always increase their athletes