Spin: Would You Rather Work For WWE or TNA?

[Vinny Lupton]

The one that's fiscally solvent.

People have been saying that for a while but they still stay afloat. However, Dixie Carter is a complete idiot.

Allegedly, Panda Energy stopped funding them recently. Which explains why they need "outside investors". It's about to be wrap nobody is gonna invest in this piece of shyt company that has never turned a profit. Anyone who voted for TNA in the poll, shoot me a private message, I have some bridges and magic beans I would like to sell you for a really good price

 

[Vinny Lupton]

Every year.

"But, Meltzer!"

The last of the Stan'hicans. Why don't you invest in TNA?

 

[mrken12]

Allegedly, Panda Energy stopped funding them recently. Which explains why they need "outside investors". It's about to be wrap nobody is gonna invest in this piece of shyt company that has never turned a profit. Anyone who voted for TNA in the poll, shoot me a private message, I have some bridges and magic beans I would like to sell you for a really good price

Wack D is definitely one of them. He hates WWE to the core. He'd rather have his favorite wrestler be homeless than possibly collect a check from Vince McMahon.

 

[mrken12]

Yeah, but they're looking to sell the company and are on the verge of getting booted off Pop so yeah.

Where did you hear this about Pop booting them?

 

[Vinny Lupton]

Wack D is definitely one of them. He hates WWE to the core. He'd rather have his favorite wrestler be homeless than possibly collect a check from Vince McMahon.

Who needs a home, mortgage payments, good schools for their kids, etc. when you can have flip floppin flippy shyt

 

[Vinny Lupton]

Seriously now - no hate, hyperbole, or anything else.

Why would any investor invest in this company?

Pretend it wasn't wrestling for a second so you can see this clearly.

This company makes NO profit. This company loses money. This company keeps getting their TV show on worse and worse networks. This company is in a line of business practically dominated by a much more successful and popular company. This company has neither a competetive advantage nor an economic moat. This company, in theory, would make some money from ticket sales to live events but they barely do any paid live events at all. This company, in theory, would make some money for TV rights fees but they get NO MONEY from their TV deal.

This company has been so poorly managed and their "brand" is so shytty. Their brand is words like Southern, WWE-lite, WWE rejects, and failure. If a brand is a promise, they have the promise of instability and constant L's. The names "TNA" and "Impact Wrestling" are a hindrance. Even if you gifted the company to someone they would have to change the name because TNA has such a negative taste in people's mouths. NEGATIVE NAME BRAND VALUE

This company fills no need in the marketplace. Kids and the "summer blockbuster movie" crowd have WWE. Super smarks have ROH and NXT. People who like fighting but not fake shyt have UFC. TNA fills no needs and solves no problems. And they make NO MONEY. Who would invest?

You invest in something when it's either 1) a great idea that needs money to get going, or 2) it's something that's already working and an injection of money would accelerate things and allow them to do things on a larger scale. Competing with WWE toe-to-toe is now and has been and will continue to be a bad idea. And what they've been doing clearly hasn't been working because any way you can quantifiably measure it, this company is a failure. Who would invest god dammit?

 

[dh86]

people have been saying this for the past 14 years.

People didnt think Bob Carter would lose over $80 million over the love of his daughter. ECW liquidated over $7 million, and im sure Smoky Mountain went under for much less than that

 

[sid the kid]

Where did you hear this about Pop booting them?

Their viewership has bottomed out. They're done on Pop. It's just a matter of time really.

 

[dh86]

If ECW hadve survived 2001, they would still be around today

 

[Silkk]

and people are too caught up with money, to the point where i can tell some of yall will bend it over for a rack.

I see why @The Great One made that thread now

 

[Silkk]

If this was 10 years ago, TNA would be a legit consideration.

But now? In 2016? fukk No

 

[The Great One]

I see why @The Great One made that thread now

Come on over breh. I been tellin you lots of stuff.

 

[mrken12]

I see why @The Great One made that thread now

Whenever anyone says there's no such thing as a wrong opinion, show them a Wack D post.

 

[Wacky D]

I see why @The Great One made that thread now

what i said mustve hit home so bad that youre cosigning a special needs poster and a cooon.

you let the old-school neighborhood fruit top you off for a bean huh?

 

[Silkk]

what i said mustve hit home so bad that youre cosigning a special needs poster and a cooon.

you let the old-school neighborhood fruit top you off for a bean huh?

Take your retarded ass on Eugene