Steph Curry's No Trade Clause denied by Warriors

Kairi Irving

Here Comes A New Challenger
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
15,630
Reputation
1,329
Daps
45,969
:jbhmm: i smell another Celtics situation brewing IF things don't go as expected for the Warriors

Report: Warriors Denied Stephen Curry a No-Trade Clause

SLAM Magazine



GettyImages-868398772.jpg

Report: Warriors Denied Stephen Curry a No-Trade Clause
November 02, 2017

Comments

By Marcel Mutoni


Stephen Curry to a five-year, $201 million contract extension this summer, but reportedly wouldn’t grant the two-time MVP the no-trade clause he pushed for.


Curry was also told no when he asked that the final year of the pact be a player option.

So, yes, the Dubs could in theory trade Curry—thereby netting him a 15% “trade kicker”—before his current contract expires.

Per The Athletic (via NBCS Bay Area):

“He didn’t get the no-trade clause or the player option he wanted.”

Related
Steve Kerr: Stephen Curry at ‘His Absolute Peak’

SHARE:
 
Last edited:

who_better_than_me

Time to go!!
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
27,202
Reputation
1,268
Daps
41,098
Reppin
NULL
He had all the leverage. He should have told him NTC or player option or he leaving when his current contract up. I don't believe the legitimacy of this article.
 
Top