Steph Curry's No Trade Clause denied by Warriors

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
944
Daps
106,204
What does this mean. I don't poccet watch
It means Curry asked for a clause in his contract where the Warriors wouldnt be able to trade him without his final approval of the deal. Guys like Kobe and Lebron have had them. Warriors said nah, we still wanna be able to ship you out if we feel like it :ufdup: Then Steph was like damn well can I at least get a player option on the last year so I can get a little bit of control over my own destiny? :feedme: And the Warriors were like :usure: NAH. Here's your money now go practice them 30 footers and try not to roll your ankle.
 

Kairi Irving

Here Comes A New Challenger
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
15,630
Reputation
1,329
Daps
45,969
Why is that thread worthy. He's an employee not a owner


.......Curry being traded wouldn't be thread worthy? This is a signal for something to come also I've seen tons of threads about players signing huge contracts get out here with that breh
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,011
Reputation
4,084
Daps
54,583
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
Top