Stephen A. Smith catching hell on twitter right now from his own Colleague at ESPN

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,085
Reputation
11,115
Daps
236,785
Im not defending shyt I'm just laughing at how a dude you don't personally know got you that heated of his words. You can twist it any way you'd like to make yourself feel better but that's all it is for me at the end of the day. Dude shouldn't have you this up in arms for his position he is in. Not like he making policy or anything that can affect us so apgving him that type of clout agree with him or not is crazy but again you keep on fighting the Internet good fight. It would help if you kept it on these comments not the other stuff we talking about domestic violence not his other stuff that's the other part that make you like a stalker on this issue. Bringing up stuff that isn't in play right now just because you don't like dude
yes....you are defending it. You won't even address it. Just doing this phony armchair psychologist shyt for a niqqa that for know you from Adam.

I don't care about the rest of that shyt you posting. Dude victim blames black people for profit. You riding for a niqqa that tells black people to live on their knees.

Congrats
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,085
Reputation
11,115
Daps
236,785
Should've shown them anyway and ruined her law career. A controlling and manipulative woman who works in law will bury the next poor guy she's with. Same reason I fear for the next guy who dated my ex. That woman is gonna be like that Kim greylek broad on SVU between Novak and Cabot but before Paula Patton. Vindictive and looking at only piling up a body count. That next guy is in serious danger.
She has my son dog. Only reason I didn't.
 

Easy-E

TSC's Ric Flair | Heel
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
55,650
Reputation
10,043
Daps
165,321
Reppin
Negativity (Kayfabe)
I think the point is we don't know if she deserved it or not or actually what happened. Everyone jumping on their soapbox to get at Ray Rice when we don't know what role the woman played in it is the problem. Stephen A's point to me is basically women aren't always the innocent little victims and at times can provoke that shyt on.
I don't care with either Beadle or SAS said. Both are right and wrong.

But, I'm convinced SAS thinks his "schtick" is being "black daddy" on 1st Take.

It's the same thing that bothers me about Barack Obama, sometimes. I'm tired of these "black ppl, you have no excuse, you have to take responsibility..."

SAS ain't asking "what she do to deserve it" if it's a white woman. That's the only thing I care about.
I agree, but lets remember Steven A. struck a fairly aggressive pro black tone a decade ago, and because of that white folks found him offensive and he was subsequently run out of ESPN on a rail. During his time in exile he was "rehabilitated", and taught how to tailor his views that align with the conservative whims of white america.

Whether these are now his true views or not, its clear he's hit a sweet spot with white viewers who now found him more tolerable than ever before, and the show is now a cash cow for ESPN. I dont watch the show (only watch clips here and there), but from what ive seen Skip will strike the more progressive left wing tone on debates,and Im sure thats by design. An outspoken black man who is sympathetic to social justice just doesnt fly in today's America, especially in the age of Obama where white folks are mad uptight with him in charge.Whites will at least not revolt if the white guy is the left-leaning one (i remember that skip was more outraged at donald sterling than steven a was --- the latter kept harping on the NAACP).

Its tough for blacks to eat out here and keep our pride 100% in tact...not that im trying to let steven a off the hook because im terribly disappointed in him. Im desperately trying to understand his views.

SAS was never "pro-black." I ain't seen it.

Before he was on First Take, all I remember is that rant he had against black athletes which sounds alot like his weekly siliquoys, now.

This still sickens me.



Because I know what it is. ESPN don't care to uplift black people.

I can't stand when ppl hit us with that "What, are black ppl above critisim?" as if they mean to help us, when they won't play this much mind to the prison system, racist housing practices, black schools closing/prisons opening, etc.

It my fault for paying this dude mind, time and time, again
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,429
Reputation
-10,651
Daps
150,988
Reppin
Inches

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
740
Daps
37,469
Reppin
The 215
yes....you are defending it. You won't even address it. Just doing this phony armchair psychologist shyt for a niqqa that for know you from Adam.

I don't care about the rest of that shyt you posting. Dude victim blames black people for profit. You riding for a niqqa that tells black people to live on their knees.

Congrats
Nope keep trying to rally the troops with your female style of he's against us then use emotional strings ass approach to get sympathy. I guess you've never agreed with someone you don't like ever? Since this the Internet I know the answer but it happens for regular people (not y'all cyborgs) don't mean I'm riding for him outside we agree on this issue. I'm not a chick I can agree with people on certain shyt even if I don't rock with them all the time or at all.
 

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,558
Reputation
2,451
Daps
53,720
Reppin
NULL
the issue was bigger than michelle beadle ... his colleagues, rivals, tons of high profile blogs and media outlets were coming for his neck. Those things get the attention of advertisers. Which can hurt espn ... which can jeopardize his job

call me whatever fam
but i aint apologizing for something i didnt do or say
even in the face of getting fired
dats bullshyt
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,085
Reputation
11,115
Daps
236,785
Nope keep trying to rally the troops with your female style of he's against us then use emotional strings ass approach to get sympathy. I guess you've never agreed with someone you don't like ever? Since this the Internet I know the answer but it happens for regular people (not y'all cyborgs) don't mean I'm riding for him outside we agree on this issue. I'm not a chick I can agree with people on certain shyt even if I don't rock with them all the time or at all.
Rally the troops?

You riding for a c00n that tears down black people for profit. I rather live with YOU thinking I'm feminine for calling him out than ride for a man who advocates niqqas living on their knees
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,085
Reputation
11,115
Daps
236,785
She got
My sympathies man. That's my other gripe. In a divorce, the woman has to be jack in the shining type nuts or she gets the kids. Sad thing.
She got married 3 weeks ago. The best thing that has happened to ME!!! :heh:
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,925
Daps
94,012
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
Let me be clear, there is no excuse ever to lay hands on a woman in a violent manner. I mean, maybe if you are legitimately defending your life from a gun/knife/baseball bat or something...but even then its tricky in a court of law.

With that said, its obvious most men need to be punished and need to seriously re-assess themselves when they do beat a woman, and so should anyone guilty of physical abuse. However, I think it is pretty fukked up that some women use the fact that they will always have the benefit of the doubt in any physical dispute with a man so that they almost have diplomatic immunity when it comes to getting physical. It's real fukked up from a mental standpoint. Some do this because they know most men will not fight back whatsoever and if they do they will go to jail for a long time, its almost like baiting them into fukking their life up in certain situations if things go against what they want, which is to inflict physical harm and also, usually, establish some sort of dominance. Obviously, some men deserve it or whatever, but still, i dont think that violence is ever the best answer and should be avoided by both sides at all costs. Many can just as easily cut off ties with one another and stop putting themselves in a situation where they can be angered to a degree to result to such buffoonery, no matter the cause (or if alcohol/drugs are involved), and this goes for both genders.
 

Th3G3ntleman

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,806
Reputation
-2,761
Daps
54,182
Reppin
NULL
Nope keep trying to rally the troops with your female style of he's against us then use emotional strings ass approach to get sympathy. I guess you've never agreed with someone you don't like ever? Since this the Internet I know the answer but it happens for regular people (not y'all cyborgs) don't mean I'm riding for him outside we agree on this issue. I'm not a chick I can agree with people on certain shyt even if I don't rock with them all the time or at all.

Not even sure why people argue with this Rebel dude. He only has one mode and you'll never win with him no matter how wrong he is.

I totally agree with you breh, just cause Stephen A has shown himself to be an idiot 95% of the time doesn't mean that when he's right the 5% that your suppose to hold the 95 against him. People can separate issues it's not that hard.
 

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
740
Daps
37,469
Reppin
The 215
Rally the troops?

You riding for a c00n that tears down black people for profit. I rather live with YOU thinking I'm feminine for calling him out than ride for a man who advocates niqqas living on their knees
Another female tactic switching words up. I don't think your feminine for calling him out. I said I can tell your bias about him period. I said your being feminine because for you if people agree with SAS on this issue they now agree with him and want blacks to live on their knees. This ain't no two for one on agreements fam. When agreeing with dude on this issue which is domestic violence doesn't mean you agree with that living on your knees stuff. Only somebody that is being real emotional like you are in this situation can't see that.
 
Top