Stephen A. Smith catching hell on twitter right now from his own Colleague at ESPN

Consigliere

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
10,689
Reputation
1,953
Daps
37,758
Stephen a has said far worse shyt about laying hands on woman, shaking them and such so I dont get this whole fuss..........


The comical shyt is before this fuss, I thought he would have got in trouble earlier in the week, when he said he hope his enemy die and burn in hell and went on a 5 min rant about it..................................Stephen has been tripping post vacation lmao, shame he gets caught up here he really aint say anything bad and if you want you can dig up far worse shyt on this subject to dirty him up

He might not make it to football season. :sadcam:
Not only is baseball dying; it's killing his career.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,825
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,269
:snoop:

I don't think you cats realize the slippery slope you're creating with this line of thinking. Cacs think the same way as you do when it comes to Black men vs law enforcement and its bullshyt. The ones in positions of power in situations have a responsibility to not abuse it. Period.
No, you're not going to equate the difference in power between black men vs the racist system of white supremacy with the difference of power between the average man and woman. I'm not advocating for anyone to abuse their power men or women. I'm saying that the standards of behavior need to be the same for both sexes. If it's supposed to be wrong for a man to put hands on a woman then it should be just as wrong for women to put hands on men. The double standard that people like you want to perpetuate just isn't flying.

I just wish that you all had the courage to come and say that you think that women are inferior. Just want women to know exactly what kind of men are caping for them on this issue.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
47,333
Reputation
4,051
Daps
71,536
Reppin
Michigan
:dahell: Why must every discussion that has to do with women being accountable somehow go into the extreme examples of rape?
Because it backs the women are always victims stance people wanna push. In reality there is nothing a woman can do that justifies her being raped. That can't be provoked and a rape is always a violation but that's real rape not consensual sex that retroactively becomes rape because she's pissed off at him afterwards and wants to get back at him.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,825
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,269
Nah, I'm with @Piff Perkins on this one.

Short of threatening your life or the life of someone else in the vicinity, or proof that you are mentally imbalanced in some way, there is nothing that a woman can do to you that justifies beating her. IDGAF if she insults your family, your friends, your kids, your pipegame, whatever - if she's using words and your response results in her being bruised and/or bloodied, you have no excuse. It's easy as fukk to restrain a weaponless woman without causing serious harm.

I won't front and say I don't understand the desire to beat the shyt out of a woman who's pissing you off - that's natural. But to act on it in situations that aren't threatening your life are completely unnecessary.
I have no problem with this mentality if you're consistent with it and apply it to men as well. If a woman can't give you a reason to put hands on(which is different from beating btw) her outside of the kind of examples that you listed then you should feel the same about men too. In which case it's just easier to say "outside of threatening your life blah blah...there's nothing that anyone can do to justify putting your hands on them". Why it's so difficult for people with your mentality to just say that I don't know.
 

bigesco

Pro
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
1,611
Reputation
155
Daps
2,102
Reppin
#Byrdgang
That's not what he said though. It could have been what he meant but for someone who makes such an effort to use a thesaurus in order to sound educated and articulate, he fukked that one up badly.

It sounded much more like "you're the woman, don't piss off your master or you'll get the beats". There was no need to say anything other than that domestic violence is wrong for EITHER gender and that anyone who is getting assaulted needs to get out of that relationship.

:wtf:

He didnt say that at all. Just because someone is gettin beat on dont mean they aint partially responsible GTFOH
 

SunZoo

The Legendary Super Sapien.
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
35,639
Reputation
13,056
Daps
136,424
Reppin
T.L.C.
Stephen a has said far worse shyt about laying hands on woman, shaking them and such so I dont get this whole fuss..........


The comical shyt is before this fuss, I thought he would have got in trouble earlier in the week, when he said he hope his enemy die and burn in hell and went on a 5 min rant about it..................................Stephen has been tripping post vacation lmao, shame he gets caught up here he really aint say anything bad and if you want you can dig up far worse shyt on this subject to dirty him up

:laugh: That nikka been going ham on the low...and be real, you can say it's because he's black but I doubt any of those white commentators go off on a 4-5 minute tangent about what women should or shouldn't do and when...he wasn't wrong, he just didn't articulate it in a way that looked good on TV.
 

Cory MBA

Bigger Picture
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
5,120
Reputation
1,602
Daps
15,125
SAS getting his well deserved comeuppance. Yeah, I know he's not advocating domestic violence, but he failed the empathy test. All he had to do was say the cliche 'never hit a woman' and this would be a non-story.

He gets no sympathy from me.:sas2:

SAS should know how Black men are viewed when they speak their minds in public. It makes a certain type of white person feel threatened. Instead of being a verbal thug, he should pull his metaphorical pants up. Stop wearing his linguistic hat backwards and comply with the dominant discourse the same way he advocates young Black men should.

:sas1: His fault entirely for not creating an atmosphere for Beadle to feel safe. Now she's gotta cross the hallway when she sees him at work and clutch her purse like Mark Cuban.
Dap plus rep.....nice post
 

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,173
Reputation
10,360
Daps
225,563
yeah i ultimately agree with this. the easist thing to solve this isituation is for dudes who are assaulted to report the assault, and the law to take the womans actions seriously. but dudes never report it cause they dont wanna be clowned. so they leave the door open for the woman behaviour to continue. solange should have been arrested, chads girl, ray rices woman, should also have ben arrested along with their spouses. that is the only sensible deterrent. so i guess i blame the dudes for not reporting instead of letting it slide in jays case, and overreacting in chad and ray rice case. i also blame the law which can act even if a report isnt made. so blame the law and embarrased dudes.

All this shyt you types and not one ounce of accountability for women :snoop:
 

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,173
Reputation
10,360
Daps
225,563
It's a fact that women are not as physically as strong as men on average. That's a biological fact. I'm not going to attack anyone who is not a threat to me, whether it's a woman or a kid or Yung Berg. Unless they have the means of doing bodily harm to me, such as with a weapon.

Look, I've been in situations where chicks have gone apeshyt, I know they can do damage. But I also know they can be restrained, or you can walk away. Nothing gets hurt but your pride. There's no fukking way Ray Rice's little ass fiance would do anything to warrant the retaliation he gave her, end of story. She didn't have a weapon on her, she isn't half a strong as him, she was in an enclosed area where she couldn't grab and use items to attack him, etc.

When I hear "provoke" in relation to female victims of violence, it makes me wonder what other shyt people think. I'd love to hear SAS's views on whether women can be responsible for being raped or sexually assaulted - ie "well she was wearing that sun dress and had a couple drinks."

:mindblown: what the hell does that have to do with SAS wanting females to not hit men and provoke them. You and Beadle are the only ones bringing up rape :mindblown:
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
70,123
Reputation
11,125
Daps
237,008
:mindblown: what the hell does that have to do with SAS wanting females to not hit men and provoke them. You and Beadle are the only ones bringing up rape :mindblown:
SAS didn't say "women not to hit on men."

All the bragging that clown does about himself and saying black folks can't articulate themselves, so many of you have spent that time making up for his lack of it when making his statements.
 
Top