Stephen A. Smith channels @theworldismine13

[Dusty Bake Activate]

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/stephen-...ack-american-would-vote-gop-for-one-election/

 

[gho3st]

a term is only 1 year brehs and lets put more of them in power despite them saying a bunch of shyt. That'll teach them and they'll reach out to us as a result

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

a term is only 1 year brehs and lets put more of them in power despite them saying a bunch of shyt. That'll teach them and they'll reach out to us as a result

He's a dumb ass. He said blacl people were fooled into supporting the Dems because LBJ signed the Civil Right Act of 1964 but it was the Republican Senate that pushed it and Dems tried to block it. This idiot didn't know those were the dixiecrats who subsequently switched parties. He even said correct me if I'm wrong and someone tried to.

Why even speak on it if you don't know what you're talking about? And he insulted black people by saying we're as dumb as him.

 

[theworldismine13]

How is that channelling me? What I've said is that black should split the vote, forever not one year

And it's not just that I think it should happen, it's also my prediction, I think obama will be the peak of black votes for democrats

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

How is that channelling me? What I've said is that black should split the vote, forever not one year

And it's not just that I think it should happen, it's also my prediction, I think obama will be the peak of black votes for democrats

Did you watch the video? He said for one year every black person should vote Repub just to start it, but overall he said he wanted to split the vote permanently and used the same arguments you use.

To be fair to you, he was factually incorrect about the LBJ/CRA stuff and I don't recall you ever being that.

 

[Robbie3000]

I remember when he got dropped from ESPN he used to suck Rush and Hannity trying to get on as a right wing pundit.

 

[88m3]

classic

 

[88m3]

I remember when he got dropped from ESPN he used to suck Rush and Hannity trying to get on as a right wing pundit.

smith or twism?

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

I remember when he got dropped from ESPN he used to suck Rush and Hannity trying to get on as a right wing pundit.

ESPN did the world a disservice by allowing this clown to talk about stuff outside of sports. The gap between his level of knowledge and his level of self-importance is staggering.

 

[88m3]

scottbrowning • 10 minutes ago
When a black man graduates MagnaCum Laude from Harvard Law, his education is suspect. When a white man is a college dropout, he's the front runner for President in the Republican Party.

That is today's GOP.

@KingpinOG

 

[theworldismine13]

Did you watch the video? He said for one year every black person should vote Repub just to start it, but overall he said he wanted to split the vote permanently and used the same arguments you use.

To be fair to you, he was factually incorrect about the LBJ/CRA stuff and I don't recall you ever being that.

nah, i cant watch it now, but if he is saying what im saying more power to him

 

[KingpinOG]

@KingpinOG

People questioned President Bush's education and he graduated from Yale and Harvard.

 

[No_bammer_weed]

*Yawn*. Another conversation conservatives advance with blacks that is characteristically belligerent and insulting. Little variation to the themes. Its like a script:

• You have the misrepresentation of epochs in history in order to minimize republican liability and/or enhance the republican brand. Here SAS butchers the civil rights movement, attendant support via political orientation, and the immediate outcomes. (Dixiecrats were conservative of course...segregationalist politicians would always portray any candidate who wasnt hardline against integration as "liberal" or "radical")
• He portrays blacks as empty-headed. Dim witted. Easily fooled and befuddled, and unable to grasp basic facts and concepts.
• He undermines the citizenship of black people as constitutional actors by making references to blacks either being slaves or living under American apartheid in the south as a way to intimidate blacks and put us in our place. In this speech he goes for "disenfranchisement" and "living under democrats thumb", so here he went for the Jim crow allusions versus the slavery appeals like "democratic planation". Reinforcing the idea that its blacks who do it to themselves.

The facts are that republicans are moving in the wrong direction when it comes to various ethnic groups, the least of which blacks. All groups are responding appropriately to republican messaging. Latino support especially has collapsed post-Bush admin. (you'll never hear this kind of language directed at latinos, asians, and jews who all overwhelmingly support dems).

Obviously a certain amount of angst and paranoia is at play when it comes to republicans hemorrhaging votes with groups outside of southern white males in the last few years, but the republican problem seems to be their inability to properly respond in the age of Obama and attract diversity in voters. Is this due to a lack of smarts, arrogance, racism --- a combo of all three?

 

[theworldismine13]

*Yawn*. Another conversation conservatives advance with blacks that is characteristically belligerent and insulting. Little variation to the themes. Its like a script:

• You have the misrepresentation of epochs in history in order to minimize republican liability and/or enhance the republican brand. Here SAS butchers the civil rights movement, attendant support via political orientation, and the immediate outcomes. (Dixiecrats were conservative of course...segregationalist politicians would always portray any candidate who wasnt hardline against integration as "liberal" or "radical")
• He portrays blacks as empty-headed. Dim witted. Easily fooled and befuddled, and unable to grasp basic facts and concepts.
• He undermines the citizenship of black people as constitutional actors by making references to blacks either being slaves or living under American apartheid in the south as a way to intimidate blacks and put us in our place. In this speech he goes for "disenfranchisement" and "living under democrats thumb", so here he went for the Jim crow allusions versus the slavery appeals like "democratic planation". Reinforcing the idea that its blacks who do it to themselves.

The facts are that republicans are moving in the wrong direction when it comes to various ethnic groups, the least of which blacks. All groups are responding appropriately to republican messaging. Latino support especially has collapsed post-Bush admin. (you'll never hear this kind of language directed at latinos, asians, and jews who all overwhelmingly support dems).

Obviously a certain amount of angst and paranoia is at play when it comes to republicans hemorrhaging votes with groups outside of southern white males in the last few years, but the republican problem seems to be their inability to properly respond in the age of Obama and attract diversity in voters. Is this due to smarts, arrogance, racism --- a combo of all three?

yawn, you wrote all that just to say black people need to support the good white folk of the democratic party?

 

[No_bammer_weed]

yawn, you wrote all that just to say black people need to support the good white folk of the democratic party?

Naw...non reading boy. I sad that conservatives need to take personal responsibility for their laziness, poor strategies and messaging, and inability to attract votes outside of southern white males. Its easy to appeal to the worst instincts of bigots...its harder to create a diverse coalition of support that actually looks like America and not the dixie south circa 1962.

SAS used the "shoppers" metaphor. Well could you imagine if a business responded to a hemorrhaging of customers by not finding ways to reverse the trends and fight for their business, and instead choosing to boorishly insult them, and claim they are stupid and slave like in mind because they arent frequenting their establishment?