This doesn’t apply to me, because I know Memphis and once knew a huge chunk of the city inside and out...
You got nikkas in here talking bout Memphis has no nice areas who never even been to Memphis. Them the nighas you need to be coming at lmao...
Where exactly are you from? I've spent time, real time, everywhere from Millbranch to Westwood to the South Third corridor, specifically The Belts, Kansas, Florida, etc.
Been up thru Hollywood and Frayser Blvd. The avenue currently known as "Range Line Rd" used to be called Hollywood Blvd, spent plenty of time over on Clifton Ave...
Someone in here mentioned how Memphis doesn't have an amusement park as entertainment----->but it used to, it used to have Liberty Land. I'm old enough and familiar enough with Memphis to recall these things, as well as Peabody Place downtown which was a huge deal many years ago when it opened...
I've eaten everywhere from Rendezvous to Jack Pirtle's, I haven't been to Memphis in 8 years but I know the city fam, this aint some random nigha talking who never been there...
The main point of contention in this thread, is the assertion that Memphis doesn't have nice areas. I'm someone who has spent plenty of time there, I can't let nikkas get off with that!
Fair enough on saying I sound hypocritical, but I'll point out that the context in me calling Memphis overrated was, I believe, because people were shytting on California cities allegedly not having enough black people...
I wouldn't live in Memphis again, the safety would only be an issue for rearing my kids there, but that isn't a real consideration because my kids won't grow up there. I wouldn't live in Memphis again because it lacks the attributes I look for in a home, and I'm also not a huge fan of Southern cities. I'd have to go down the list a ways before I get to "safety"...
I think my overrated comment was also about statements inflating its cultural significance. Memphis' cultural weight meant more pre-1980. Its cultural weight today in the last 45 years, is minimal, its more about what it "was", than what it "is"...
I'm not cutting city size either, DMAs, GDPs, and measures of economic performance are based on metropolitan areas, not city. Nobody thinks Jacksonville is a bigger city than Miami, literally nobody says this, but your logic is that it would be considered such. The metro populations of Memphis and Hartford make them peers, as does the correlating measures that highlight this...
Lastly, you missed my point on the Hartford/Memphis comp---->Memphis wouldn't be 600,000 in New England because it wouldn't be given 300 mi² of land to achieve it the way it could in Tennessee. Hartford in Tennessee would be given hundreds of miles of room to expand before the city borders pop up...