Stephen A. Smith shyts on Luke Walton and Kerr
- Thread starter Pdiddy
- Start date
Breaking out of that c00n shell by the minute
T-K-G
Veteran
People give mark his props
but it was obvious he didnt have enough to make that final leap to making the warriors a championship team
stephen needs to sit his ass down with this backhanded shade to kerr and walton
but it was obvious he didnt have enough to make that final leap to making the warriors a championship team
stephen needs to sit his ass down with this backhanded shade to kerr and walton
fukk Stephen A for the most part, but he spits hot fiya when it comes to that coke fiend jim buss. I wish more reporters ethered that piece of shyt the way 
do.
do.
Johnny Vulture
Lemonade Mimosas
Nice try that c00n knows that nobody is seriously giving Walton or Kerr credit for that roster
If coaching has nothin to do with it why give mark the credit instead 
are we spose to give Mike Brown credit for mentoring and devoloping Bron to the player he is now 
Get over it sas
are we spose to give Mike Brown credit for mentoring and devoloping Bron to the player he is now Get over it sas
The God Poster
LWO representa
The ball movement under Mark wasn't as crisp tho
who_better_than_me
Time to go!!
He shyts on kerr But he was sympathetic for mcfail
Come on now, shyt don't even make sense.
Come on now, shyt don't even make sense.
Those David Lee posts though.The ball movement under Mark wasn't as crisp tho
Warriors obviously took a jump with Kerr. Jackson should get alot of credit for the defensive identity he gave them, but they were underperforming offensively. Offense didn't have the same flow or crispness. Not even close
Mark deserves another head coaching gig though, I'm generally shocked he hasn't gotten one yet? Unless he prefers being a commentator?
Mark deserves another head coaching gig though, I'm generally shocked he hasn't gotten one yet? Unless he prefers being a commentator?
nikka wtf are you talking about? It was under Mark Jackson he emerged as a superstar.
Why is he giving Mark Jax credit like he put the roster together, and I seriously doubt he was pulling rank on personnel decisions over Jerry West like SAS is saying. Jax had their offense looking like some late 90s/early-mid 2000s iso boolshyt, nothing like what they've been running since last season. I agree with him that he should get another shot at a HC gig(and hopefully not a dead end job like the BK Nets like what Hollins got stuck with), but SAS is just looking out for an ESPN homey.
If Luke Walton gets a job before Mark Jackson
Steph Curry playing for Mark Jackson was like playing under x1000 gravity. It made him stronger, sure but the shyt was limiting for Curry.
And Jackson was too controlling. Refused to let assistant coaches do their jobs.
And Jackson was too controlling. Refused to let assistant coaches do their jobs.
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
Idk what sort of revisionist history SAS is trying to spit with this "inherited" talk but the team Kerr took over was nothing like the team GS is today. Warriors werent even contenders under Mark Jackson, forget 20-0.