In a real discussion about domestic violence as a whole, where all aspects of violent relationships and the people involved in them are clearly analyzed and dissected. Of all of the things to mention after a one sided altercation, he says that women shouldn't be bringing these things on themselves.
The people on Stephens side keep mentioning "accountability" yet they continue to deny that they're blaming the victim. That's what it's all about, that the woman should be dragged through the mud for her own role in this. The "men aren't allowed to defend themselves!" and "bytches be crazy!" Strawman arguments are being thrown around left or right when neither come close to applying in this case.
Those men can be victims of domestic violent too
?As fathers,brothers and sons to females,are men who would be compelled to go mollywhop or kill a man who puts his hands on his daughter,sister,mama allowed to tell women not to provoke men
? Its nikkas out here who stay having to run up on nikkas and put they life at risk cuz they female family members wanna call they people everytime they go smacking on a nikka and get hands put on em.....if the first thing these women gon do is call her daddy,brother,cousins after she hit a man and it goes bad for her
....I think men got a right to be able to tell these women to
on the violence.....going to jail behind a womans actions doesn't only happen to the man who hauls off and hits her....it can happen to the men in her family who retaliate because "Its never okay for a man to hit a woman"....it would be nice to know when you going to fukk up a man who hit your female loved one that she played no part in it...butt I guess women gon keep bein selfish and putting male family members and friends in bad/criminal/deadly situations
looks like he's saggin too


For every step a woman takes forward a man likes you puts them in an inferior/subservient role.
Wow just wow....You have just set the women's rights movement back to the beginning...You tapped the reset button.
and he seems ok with it