Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread

[the cac mamba]

can someone tell this guy there is no deal for Pelosi to take.
.

the mnuchin deal that's endorsed by the white house

you guys are absolutely allergic to accepting any criticism of this party ive never seen anything like it

what does pelosi lose by taking the mnuchin deal? why cant you answer the question?

 

[Jchr is]

can someone tell this guy there is no deal for Pelosi to take.

I guess he wants her to sit there and take a deal with herself while the rest of congress is on recess.

No see, we don't understand that this bytch literally can just snap her fingers and take the deal with Steve, bypass the senate, and have it here for us all to get through the hard times. It isn't the republicans fukking this up, just one old ass bytch in the House who hasn't spent all year sending bills to the senate to pass, but has been constantly denying us this one thing that would solve everything if she would just agree. fukking old bytch fukked everything up. no one else. just her old wrinkle p*ssy ass.

 

[the cac mamba]

His whole argument is that Pelosi should take the deal and point the finger at the Republicans and try to shame them for not passing the stimulus. What he is willfully being obtuse about is the fact that Republicans DGAF about being 'shamed.'
.

wrong, because we never put it to the test. we NEVER took the deal and had the democrats and trump publicly shaming the republican senate into passing stimulus for the american people, two weeks before the election. pelosi completely squandered that opportunity, you're fukkin right i blame her for that

so i'll say it again, in the simplest terms. pelosi should take the 1.9 trillion from mnuchin

that's my idea; what the fukk is yours? if you have a better plan of action, then what the fukk is it? lets hear it

now this is where you duck the question, because you know that im right and you have no better plan

 

[AquaCityBoy]

wrong, because we never put it to the test. we NEVER took the deal and had the democrats and trump publicly shaming the republican senate into passing stimulus for the american people, two weeks before the election. pelosi completely squandered that opportunity

If Mitch gave a fukk about Trump shaming them, he wouldn't have adjourned the senate.

 

[the cac mamba]

so i'll say it again, in the simplest terms. pelosi should take the 1.9 trillion from mnuchin

that's my idea; what the fukk is yours? if you have a better plan of action, then what the fukk is it? lets hear it

now this is where you duck the question, because you know that im right and you have no better plan

If Mitch gave a fukk about Trump shaming them, he wouldn't have adjourned the senate.

just like i said, you ducked the question because you know that im right and you have no better plan

by all means, please use the next post to prove me wrong. what is your idea that's better than pelosi taking the 1.9?

 

[AquaCityBoy]

im not even gonna entertain this clown shyt. keep crying about mcconnell being a bad person, its accomplished a lot so far

Here he is in the other thread admitting that it's pointless to try to shame McConnell.

But for some reason he thinks Pelosi doing it will really make a difference.

 

[the cac mamba]

Here he is in the other thread admitting that it's pointless to try to shame McConnell.

But for some reason he thinks Pelosi doing it will really make a difference.

holy shyt why are you so afraid of this post?

i say that pelosi's best course of action is to take the 1.9. if i'm so wrong, then what the fukk is your better plan? why can't you say what it is?

i guess i'll take your shytposting as an admission that yes, she should take it. glad we agree

 

[AquaCityBoy]

you know that im right

You've had about half a dozen contradictory arguments in these threads, so which one are you right about?

 

[the cac mamba]

You've had about half a dozen contradictory arguments in these threads, so which one are you right about?

its october 27th and pelosi should take the mnuchin deal

if i'm wrong, then what is your better plan?

 

[Hood Critic]

the mnuchin deal that's endorsed by the white house

1. Your party does not like Mnuchin and considers it HIS deal, not theirs.
2. Your party does not give a sh*t about what Trump wants.
3. Your party's Senate Majority Leader has laid out his terms for bringing a vote to floor on this matter, ultimately saying Mnuchin doesn't speak for your party.
4. Since his terms were not met, the Senate will go on recess.
5. In case you don't understand 1-4 - it might as well be you negotiating with Pelosi because McConnell is treating Mnuchin like he doesn't exist. Therefore, he has no authority to make a deal.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

its october 27th and pelosi should take the mnuchin deal

if i'm wrong, then what is your better plan?

What purpose would taking the Mnuchin deal at this point serve?

Be specific

 

[the cac mamba]

1. Your party does not like Mnuchin and considers it HIS deal, not theirs.
2. Your party does not give a sh*t about what Trump wants.
3. Your party's Senate Majority Leader has laid out his terms for bringing a vote to floor on this matter, ultimately saying Mnuchin doesn't speak for your party.
4. Since his terms were not met, the Senate will go on recess.
5. In case you don't understand 1-4 - it might as well be you negotiating with Pelosi because McConnell is treating Mnuchin like he doesn't exist. Therefore, he has no authority to make a deal.

and not once have you explained what she has to lose by taking it because you can't. because you're wrong

if you don't want pelosi to take the 1.9, then what the fukk is YOUR plan?

 

[the cac mamba]

What purpose would taking the Mnuchin deal at this point serve?

Be specific

i'll take your cowardice as an admission that im right. i asked you a simple question 5 fukking times and you refuse to answer it, because you cant

pathetic. absolutely pathetic

 

[Hood Critic]

and not once have you explained what she has to lose by taking it because you can't. because you're wrong

if you don't want pelosi to take the 1.9, then what the fukk is YOUR plan?

How do you take something that doesn't exist?

 

[the cac mamba]

How do you take something that doesn't exist?

you're lying to make a point. how did pelosi proudly turn it down on wolf blitzer if it doesnt exist?

i'll ask you for the 80th time, because you're also clearly terrified of answering the question

i think pelosi should take the 1.9 from mnuchin. if you disagree with me, then fine. what the fukk is your better plan?