Stimulus & Bailout Watch Thread

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,381
Reputation
9,756
Daps
191,856
Reppin
NULL
So, if no stimulus is passed because Democrats refuse to budge on corporate liability, 12 million people lose their unemployment right on the cusp of winter and the people who’re able to sue employers have jobs to go to.

That’s acceptable to you.

:unimpressed:

This is nonsense. If no stimulus is passed, it's not because Democrats refused to budge on corporate liability. Rethuglicans have made it very clear that they have no interest in passing another stimulus at all. The corporate liability shield is nothing but a poison pill because they knew Democrats wouldn't go for it, and they shouldn't.

but they dont have liability protection right now :why:

what lawsuits are gonna be filed in the future, if people arent even filing them 8 months into the pandemic on ANY kind of wide scale?

you want to hold out on stimulus so that people can maybe file phantom lawsuits in the future? :dead:

By your own logic, there's no reason to have a corporate liability shield.

So if there's no need for it, why are Rethuglicans pushing so hard for it? :jbhmm:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,764
Reputation
14,305
Daps
316,854
Reppin
NULL
This is nonsense. If no stimulus is passed, it's not because Democrats refused to budge on corporate liability. Rethuglicans have made it very clear that they have no interest in passing another stimulus at all. The corporate liability shield is nothing but a poison pill because they knew Democrats wouldn't go for it, and they shouldn't.



By your own logic, there's no reason to have a corporate liability shield.

So if there's no need for it, why are Rethuglicans pushing so hard for it? :jbhmm:
because

-republicans suck corporate dikk as a rule
-they're correctly trying to prevent frivolous lawsuits in a country full of frivolous litigation

now your turn; if theres no lawsuits being filed now, 8 months into this thing, then why the fukk is this something to hold out for?

democrats are just playing this bullshyt role that "we're against the corporations, man" but what are the real life implications :mindblown: there are no lawsuits NOW
 

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,381
Reputation
9,756
Daps
191,856
Reppin
NULL
because

-republicans suck corporate dikk as a rule
-they're correctly trying to prevent frivolous lawsuits in a country full of frivolous litigation

now your turn; if theres no lawsuits being filed now, 8 months into this thing, then why the fukk is this something to hold out for?

democrats are just playing this bullshyt role that "we're against the corporations, man" but what are the real life implications :mindblown: there are no lawsuits NOW

Everything you just said after the bolded contradicts that very point. By your own logic, there are no lawsuits now. So what are Rethuglicans 'correctly' trying to prevent? Again, by your logic, they're trying to solve a 'problem' that doesn't exist all to give corporations even more impunity to screw over the working class.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: NZA
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
34,006
Reputation
2,004
Daps
166,423
This is nonsense. If no stimulus is passed, it's not because Democrats refused to budge on corporate liability. Rethuglicans have made it very clear that they have no interest in passing another stimulus at all. The corporate liability shield is nothing but a poison pill because they knew Democrats wouldn't go for it, and they shouldn't.

I don’t buy this. Republicans, like Democrats, know a stimulus has to be passed. The country can’t afford for a stimulus not to be passed. They simply hold leverage, being in control of the Senate, and are using it in these negotiations. Democrats are the ones who refuse to accept corporate liability protection.

:unimpressed:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,764
Reputation
14,305
Daps
316,854
Reppin
NULL
Everything you just said after the bolded contradicts that very point. By your own logic, there are no lawsuits now. So what are Rethuglicans 'correctly' trying to prevent? Again, by your logic, they're trying to solve a 'problem' that doesn't exist all to give corporations even more impunity to screw over the working class.
breh, the burden of proof isnt on me :dead:

we're 9 months into the pandemic. AS IT STANDS, republicans dont have liability protection. yet there is no significant evidence of any lawsuits. you can sue your employer RIGHT NOW, and yet people are not

so what the fukk are the dems protecting? why cant you post a single lawsuit that this is supposedly worth holding out for?

as far as i can tell, this is about the dems trying to project an image :laff:
 

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,381
Reputation
9,756
Daps
191,856
Reppin
NULL
breh, the burden of proof isnt on me :dead:

we're 9 months into the pandemic. AS IT STANDS, republicans dont have liability protection. yet there is no significant evidence of any lawsuits. you can sue your employer RIGHT NOW, and yet people are not

so what the fukk are the dems protecting? why cant you post a single lawsuit that this is supposedly worth holding out for?

as far as i can tell, this is about the dems trying to project an image :laff:


You just admitted that people aren't getting sued like that, even though corporations don't have liability protection. It would reasonably follow, then, that there is no need for them to have it, because that's not even an issue. Again, this is going by your logic.

You're the one saying corporations need to be protected from frivolous lawsuits, but you already admitted no such lawsuits exist. So what are you even arguing?
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,764
Reputation
14,305
Daps
316,854
Reppin
NULL
You just admitted that people aren't getting sued like that, even though corporations don't have liability protection. It would reasonably follow, then, that there is no need for them to have it, because that's not even an issue. Again, this is going by your logic.

You're the one saying corporations need to be protected from frivolous lawsuits, but you already admitted no such lawsuits exist. So what are you even arguing?
uh, that holding out for liability protection is stupid when it isnt being used now

what the fukk are you arguing? :dead:
 

eXodus

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
8,290
Reputation
4,060
Daps
47,742
Reppin
NULL
Look man they need to do something.....

I'm not going die if I don't get a stimulus check that I don't need, but there are people in dire situations, with families who are much worse of then me, with little hope or prosperity coming.
UI/PUA extension and state and local should be no brainers. I really don’t get how Congress as an institution is so incompetent.
 

BK The Great

Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
63,381
Reputation
7,907
Daps
156,864
Reppin
BK NY
Look man they need to do something.....

I'm not going die if I don't get a stimulus check that I don't need, but there are people in dire situations, with families who are much worse of then me, with little hope or prosperity coming.


Obviously these people don't give a shyt, they need to be held responsible for the damage that's being done. This ain't getting better anytime soon and these dummies running everything need to realize that. Help is needed and they better do it fast.
 
Top