nikkas will discredit knowledge because of who's presenting it. I don't give a fukk who's presenting the knowledge, as long as the shyt accurate and has receipts to back up the claims who gives a fukk.
You replied to a comment about faith vs fact with a nonsense video that doesn't come close to educating me or anyone. SMHWhat belief? Faith? I'm not a Christian, dumbass. I already linked a video of dude breaking down the history of Christianity. Whether you watch it is on you.
Chubbs said:nikkas will discredit knowledge because of who's presenting it. I don't give a fukk who's presenting the knowledge, as long as the shyt accurate and has receipts to back up the claims who gives a fukk.



Yet you won't debate him or disprove anything he said. Okay.You replied to a comment about faith vs fact with a nonsense video that doesn't come close to educating me or anyone. SMH
I'm not Gon listen to rubbish from a that nikka.are you gonna prove what he's saying wrong? if not, shut the fukk up.
debate who?Yet you won't debate him or disprove anything he said. Okay.
He live streams on Instagram damn near daily and if you'd like to debate him, join his live stream and go live with him. Simpledebate who?
If you want me to debate someone in a recorded video, its clear you don't understand what the word debate means.
If you want to actually present an argument to discuss, feel free to do so.
What do you mean by the bolded? Some kind of prophecy?Almost, but not quite. Seems our ancestors were more familiar with the text/system than our present-day sensibilities give them credit for. When slavemasters tried to give enslaved Africans 'doctored/edited' texts, they knew they were bullshyt and walked-out of services using them en-masse.
Also, what keeps escaping most people is the simple fact that prior to the end of the Civil War, most Africans were NOT Christians. They were familiar with the belief system because it was present in Western/Central Africa prior to the start of the Trans-Atlantic trade, but were not adherents.
Slavery is NOT responsible for how Black people, today, understand Christianity.
The end of slavery is.
You're a p*ssy.I'm not Gon listen to rubbish from a that nikka.
So fukk you and him
I don't fukk with idolatry.![]()

Why should I debate someone you sought out and found, and what am I supposed to debate him over?He live streams on Instagram damn near daily and if you'd like to debate him, join his live stream and go live with him. Simple
I'm more focused on the fact that this is how she blew up so quick through witchcraft makes me believe those story's I heard before are true

MischievousMonkey said:What do you mean by the bolded? Some kind of prophecy?
Frederick Douglass said:What I have said respecting and against religion, I mean strictly to apply to the slaveholding religion of this land, and with no possible reference to Christianity proper; for, between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference — so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land.
CinnaSlim said:The Bible is an anthology. Filled with stories, letters, documents written by many different people over a very long period of time. There are extra biblical texts. But during the Council of Nicea they picked and chose what to keep and what to throw out.
CinnaSlim said:Even JWs have their own version of the Bible, put together for their own purposes. That's why it's filled with contradictions and different perspectives in the same exact book. People just kill me picking and choosing which verses to follow but condemning others for doing the same.
CinnaSlim said:The Bible has its benefits. It's information like any other book. Everything isnt to be taken literally but in context.