Summer Walker is an actual witch

Chubbs

History Remembers Kings
Supporter
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
5,919
Reputation
1,497
Daps
16,162
Reppin
Baltimore
nikkas will discredit knowledge because of who's presenting it. I don't give a fukk who's presenting the knowledge, as long as the shyt accurate and has receipts to back up the claims who gives a fukk.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,235
Daps
89,547
What belief? Faith? I'm not a Christian, dumbass. I already linked a video of dude breaking down the history of Christianity. Whether you watch it is on you.
You replied to a comment about faith vs fact with a nonsense video that doesn't come close to educating me or anyone. SMH
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,025
Daps
122,420
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Chubbs said:
nikkas will discredit knowledge because of who's presenting it. I don't give a fukk who's presenting the knowledge, as long as the shyt accurate and has receipts to back up the claims who gives a fukk.

Link the video you're talking about and it DOES matter who is presenting information.

I mean, would you trust Black history from a Ku Klux Klansmen? How about physics from a Flat Earther?

EDIT: NVM. You linked a video from Meerkabah....LMFAO!!!!!

That dude used Madame Blavatsky as a reliable source of information.......:laff::laff::laff:

He was PROUD of being ignorant, too.​
 
Last edited:

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,235
Daps
89,547
Yet you won't debate him or disprove anything he said. Okay.
debate who?
If you want me to debate someone in a recorded video, its clear you don't understand what the word debate means.
If you want to actually present an argument to discuss, feel free to do so.
 

Chubbs

History Remembers Kings
Supporter
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
5,919
Reputation
1,497
Daps
16,162
Reppin
Baltimore
debate who?
If you want me to debate someone in a recorded video, its clear you don't understand what the word debate means.
If you want to actually present an argument to discuss, feel free to do so.
He live streams on Instagram damn near daily and if you'd like to debate him, join his live stream and go live with him. Simple
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,672
Reputation
8,358
Daps
95,954
Almost, but not quite. Seems our ancestors were more familiar with the text/system than our present-day sensibilities give them credit for. When slavemasters tried to give enslaved Africans 'doctored/edited' texts, they knew they were bullshyt and walked-out of services using them en-masse.

Also, what keeps escaping most people is the simple fact that prior to the end of the Civil War, most Africans were NOT Christians. They were familiar with the belief system because it was present in Western/Central Africa prior to the start of the Trans-Atlantic trade, but were not adherents.

Slavery is NOT responsible for how Black people, today, understand Christianity.

The end of slavery is.
What do you mean by the bolded? Some kind of prophecy?
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,235
Daps
89,547
He live streams on Instagram damn near daily and if you'd like to debate him, join his live stream and go live with him. Simple
Why should I debate someone you sought out and found, and what am I supposed to debate him over?

You quoted me, what do you disagree with me about, state where YOU stand
 

CinnaSlim

Queen of Swords
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
17,079
Reputation
14,270
Daps
60,750
Reppin
East of Anywhere
The Bible is an anthology. Filled with stories, letters, documents written by many different people over a very long period of time. There are extra biblical texts. But during the Council of Nicea they picked and chose what to keep and what to throw out. Even JWs have their own version of the Bible, put together for their own purposes. That's why it's filled with contradictions and different perspectives in the same exact book. People just kill me picking and choosing which verses to follow but condemning others for doing the same.

The Bible has its benefits. It's information like any other book. Everything isnt to be taken literally but in context.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,025
Daps
122,420
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
MischievousMonkey said:
What do you mean by the bolded? Some kind of prophecy?

I'll let someone far closer to the subject answer you......

41sRYV05b6L._SX332_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Frederick Douglass said:
What I have said respecting and against religion, I mean strictly to apply to the slaveholding religion of this land, and with no possible reference to Christianity proper; for, between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference — so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,025
Daps
122,420
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
CinnaSlim said:
The Bible is an anthology. Filled with stories, letters, documents written by many different people over a very long period of time. There are extra biblical texts. But during the Council of Nicea they picked and chose what to keep and what to throw out.

This didn't happen. Hebrews chose which books to keep in the OT by about 200 BCE. Their choices were added-upon by the first Christians who were, themselves, Jews. All the Council did was hand-out Bibles to replace the ones that had been destroyed in the previous 300 years that Christians had been persecuted by Rome. The NT 'canon' was fixed by the beginning of the 2nd Century CE. This is proved by many of the early Church Fathers quoting, extensively, from those texts and calling them 'Scripture' 200+ years before Constantine was even born. Some of them even held the Book of Enoch in the same regard for a while.​

CinnaSlim said:
Even JWs have their own version of the Bible, put together for their own purposes. That's why it's filled with contradictions and different perspectives in the same exact book. People just kill me picking and choosing which verses to follow but condemning others for doing the same.

Yeah, but if you know the text, it's pretty easy to show even a JW where they are in-error in interpretation or flat-out wrong.​

CinnaSlim said:
The Bible has its benefits. It's information like any other book. Everything isnt to be taken literally but in context.

Unfortunately, 'in context' doesn't mean what most people think it means, but it is rather difficult to read the text as if one were an ancient Hebrew or 1st Century Christian/Hebrew/pagan. Those were the people the text was written to, not us, several thousand years later.​
 
Top