Tomb Raider 86-87%only debatable one.
Tomb Raider for Xbox 360 Reviews - Metacritic
Metal Gear Solid 4 94%
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots for PlayStation 3 Reviews - Metacritic
The Walking Dead 92%
The Walking Dead: A Telltale Games Series for PC Reviews - Metacritic
Uncharted 2 96%
Uncharted 2: Among Thieves for PlayStation 3 Reviews - Metacritic
none of them are debatable.
that's also throw in Bioshock 96%
BioShock for PC Reviews - Metacritic
let's also add the Arkham games 91%
Batman: Arkham Asylum for PC Reviews - Metacritic
Batman: Arkham City for PC Reviews - Metacritic
i mean Tomb Raider is a good game the games i listed are great games. Tomb Raider has no business being mentioned in the same sentence as any of them. in fact it actually heavily borrows concepts and lifts whole ideas from the last three games i listed. outside of graphics it doesn't do anything better than any of them really.
most of those games i listed were game of the year winners. not only that but they're some of the best games this generation. Tomb Raider isn't seriously gonna win any game of the year awards in fact in about two weeks a game is gonna hit that's gonna squash whatever minuscule chances it had of seeing one.



at comparing Metacritic scores. shyt makes no sense. By that logic "Tomb Raider" got an 87% with half the reviews it took "Uncharted 2" to get 96%. Does that mean it's actually better than "Uncharted 2"? What kinda logic are we using here to determine what's better based on these scores?
at saying 4 games you haven't even played 1 minute of being "easily better" than a game that's actually out. Between this statement and the Metacritic shyt I dunno if you're trolling or just have some kinda unhealthy anti-"Tomb Raider" agenda.