Exactly. Some people are saying, "Well, Jor-El was evil in Smallville" or "Kryptonians were bad in John Byrne's comic run". OK, and? That's NOT the general or standard depiction of either Jor-El or Kryptonians (outside of Zod and his followers).
I think Gunn is doing this because he prefers the belief in "found family" being greater than biological family. A common theme throughout his work.
I personally don't believe that you have to diminish Jor-El and Lara in order to glorify the Kents. All Gunn had to do was make the message from Jor-El and Lara more simple: "We love you and wish the best for you on Earth". There doesn't need to be a greater purpose (good or bad) attached to the message.
The bolded.
It was unnecessary.
Plus why as the film goer. Are we worried about.
the civilian like of the hero in this manner.
When no successful comic of the boom was welled in the civilian experience. Even xmen were removed to australia. To move away from the mutie scum ideal. Then sold a million. After the mutie scum storyline were written and in the background for a good long while. Like five years of print from 220 to 280 and xmen number one. To the point in xmen 2 when mags starts his bullshyt. Powered up and secretly siphoned by fabian. The xmen save the day. Yet there is not the same level of vitroil from the public. Like early xmen 200 mags tried in court issues. Yeah the world of marvel had issues. Yet the writers moved away from the civilian vitroil.
as a main selling point to the content. So i don't understand why gunn.
even has the parent storyline in this. It was not needed. Just like lois being insufferable was not needed and had been phased out in every aspeft of dc after superman death. As dc moved lois.
into a raven to brunette haired pinup.
that mirrored the support of maryjane and petey near their marriage. Even the post 90 tim batman burton slash tim batman art style superman cartoon gateway.
worked to and made lois excellent. The past movie made lois excellent. plus showed us like a film is supposed to. As to why supes is smitten with lois.
So i don't understsnd why Lois is retconned. Back to wack lois.
Gunn likes to follow silly campish shyt. Luckily this movie goes over well enough. That the moves gunn makes that people loathe about superman. Are swept back under the rug and forgotten about as this dcu goes on. As they need to jettison old bad that never worked. Plus made superman have to be relaunched.
more than three times.
since the nineties in print. Plus three times or more in rhe movies. Since the change of the century.
Superman always does well in reboot. Yet when you reboot superman. To then harp or add. On variables that eventually causes superman ruin and numerous reboots.
Right now dc does not have superman as a draw in print. They have an elseworld bright burn superman running around and a broke batman. That deviate from what superman and batman are at their core.
This film does a good job to mine likeable superman variables. Yet needs to jettison any bryne meets viltrumite connection for supes father. As well as jettison ugly wack lois lane meets olive oyl dynamics. Mos did a better job at explaining and making lois better. Why are we back at wack lois. When the cartoon, comic and last film franchise. Worked really hard for decades.
to change lois into an awesome character. Why are we back to margot kidder olive oyl lois lane. Where we hope superman will fukk ms tessmacher instead?
That even the og movie read our mind about fukk lois.
Like why ruin decades of perception changing character growth. Plus well the new relaunch. Into territory that usually causes another relaunch.
Art Barr