They beat kaioken Brock though. That nikka super saiyan 2 right now.
SUPPOSEDLY....Vince CAVED IN again
- Thread starter R=G
- Start date
If he does it again this year they might as well just never let Bryan ever lose the belt.
Honga Ciganesta
Japanese Keyhole Porn Don
It's the right thing to do
Conscious Pilot
Do Better.
This.
Only question is should it be Bryan or Reigns getting cashed on
Last edited:
it should end with Seth Rollins as champ anyways so all this doesn't matter
unless brock resigns
unless brock resigns
If this triple threat business is true, the chances of Reigns walking out of WM champion are small so I can see a cash-in happening. Take DB to the grand stage to have him lose to Roman? Can you imagine the nightmare that would be? It'll be like a cycle.
MenacingMonk
War & Peace
THROW IN SETH. My prediction would be right. 
This.
Only question is should it be Bryan or Reigns getting cashed on
He should cash in on Brock
Right but again, it made sense. It's not a situation where the company was pushing something and the fans were pushing back.
Lanny Piffo
Pro
This.
Only question is should it be Bryan or Reigns getting cashed on
Bryan for max heat.
Quarterback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCOaI06zAvg
We finna 
either wayDB in the ME
or
80,000 nikkas shytting all over the ME
at the nikkas here complaining about the Rumble losing its meaning, This aint the first time it didn't guarantee a 1on1 shot. Vince lost his shot in 99. Cena risked it 2 years ago. The E aint about having stringent unbreakable rules, it's about fukkery, that's why we're here. If ery single RR winner got a 1on1 shot, and there was never any fukkery in between, yall would complain that WWE should mix it up every once in a while. U fakkits don't know what you want, Vince does, that's why he's rich and you're not.And
at nikkas complaining about another Triple Threat ME, as if it wasn't trill af in 2004 and last year. shyt's gonna be dope, stop your whining.
Last edited:
the artist known az
Hail the victors
I don't know why Daniel Bryan fans want him to be in the fukking main event. How would they sell him beating Brock Lesnar? I wouldn't cave into these damn geeks 
Wouldn't it make more sense to just book the most over guy to win the Rumble?
This is two years in a row they've had to book themselves out of a situation.
I'm against another triple threat.
I would have rather turned Reigns heel and gave him the title if I was Cokeboy.
Should have stuck to the plan and made the most out of it, but Bryan will probably eat the pin from Reigns and I'm sure he's still getting the belt.
This is two years in a row they've had to book themselves out of a situation.
I'm against another triple threat.
I would have rather turned Reigns heel and gave him the title if I was Cokeboy.
Should have stuck to the plan and made the most out of it, but Bryan will probably eat the pin from Reigns and I'm sure he's still getting the belt.
I don't know why Daniel Bryan fans want him to be in the fukking main event. How would they sell him beating Brock Lesnar? I wouldn't cave into these damn geeks
Not a huge Bryan fan but this is doesn't mean much imo.
Brock took four AA's, broke Takers Wrestlemania streak, destroyed the biggest star on the roster in a squash at Summerslam, and got up at the last PPV from broken ribs and a curb stomp to win.
How do they sell anyone on the roster overcoming Brock?
As far as Daniel and Reigns goes, Reigns is bigger but has nowhere near the kayfabe achievements or feats to convince me that he's beating Brock Lesnar with a superman punch and a spear.
Daniel at least went through Evolution - Orton, Batista, HHH(who has beaten Brock)...all who are kayfabe wise, dominant - in one night if we're talking credibility.
As far I'm concerned, Daniel is in the match solely for the aforementioned reason. No one is pinning Brock clean.
If either Reigns or Bryan win, they'll win by pinning each other. That's the only way Brock will leave Mania without the belt.
That or a Rollins cheap shot, curb stomp, and cash in if he wins.