Supreme Court issues ruling in Byron Allen case

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,422
Daps
111,952
The so called liberals couldnt muster a dissent that could be used in future decisions to overturn this one.

:mjpls:
They're liberals - outside of Sotomayor throwing up the occasional dissent for prisoner's rights - not a single one of the "liberals" are Left-leaning.

Even Marshall, as pro-Black and liberal as he was, was pretty politically centrist.

You trying to publish anything before you graduate?
 

NoGutsNoGLory

Superstar
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
6,651
Reputation
566
Daps
27,618
Yeah but still, every Republican president the past 30 years has put people on the bench. We've only had two democratic presidents in 30 years..

So to talk about going out to vote is not even the issue in this case, because Republicans have installed conservative judges in the court for 30 years, not because of black people, but because white people voted for Republicans
Those democrats have been in power for 16 years :stopitslime: and one of tgose pieces of shyt pushed NAFTA and the crime bill through. Voting is pointless in a two party system.
 

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,880
Reputation
2,493
Daps
28,981
Reppin
The Set
You stupid idiot, what the fukk does white people voting for Republican presidents have to do with this case?
Live in America, be presumably black and not understand that this crop of Supreme court Judges has been decades in the making appointed by an administration that Only shows interest in ados is when they want to take something away.

Stand on that hill and call someone who points that out an idiot.

And for all the rest screaming liberal/conservative/unanimous. Research "judicial common space scores" then come back and holla at me... FAKKITS!

:pacspit:
 
Last edited:

TRY GOD

BOTH SIDES.
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,626
Reputation
3,180
Daps
76,482
Reppin
GOD
Live in America, be presumably black and not understand that this crop of Supreme court Judges has been decades in the making appointed by an administration that Only shows interest in as is is when they want to take something away.

Stand on that hill and call someone who points that out an idiot.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-624
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
Unanimous decision but somehow folks still blaming everybody/everything but the weak azz case that was based solely on the superficial form of identity politics

At the oral arguments, Erwin Chemerinsky, who was arguing for Allen, acknowledged that he eventually would have to show that race was the sole cause for Comcast’s rejection. But he argued that it would be an “insurmountable burden” to meet if plaintiffs have to prove that at the outset of the case, as they would not have the benefit of conducting depositions and discovery.
:stopitslime: hoping to find dirt after making accusations using historical Black plight to clout chase...another self serving clown that successfully manipulated the dap fishermen of thecoli
 

Pull Up the Roots

Talking? During horse head bookends?
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
26,039
Reputation
13,466
Daps
112,351
Reppin
Detroit
That guys comment about "not voting" still holds weight at least where the federal courts are concerned. The 9th circuit ruled in his favor - it's a very important circuit for such issues - and we're on the verge of losing it due to Trump's appointments.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,422
Daps
111,952
Unanimous decision but somehow folks still blaming everybody/everything but the weak azz case that was based solely on the superficial form of identity politics


:stopitslime: hoping to find dirt after making accusations using historical Black plight to clout chase...another self serving clown that successfully manipulated the dap fishermen of thecoli
I don’t think you understand how cases based on racial discrimination work.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
43,874
Reputation
22,359
Daps
135,677


Basically Ginsburg gave him an opening to find racial discrimination in discovery. But he has to find the evidence to prove it. Also, what she says is that the Congress needs to amend 1866 to allow what he's trying to sue for. Which is a "motivating factor" as opposed to "the defining concrete reason". A heavy burden indeed.
 
Top