Surprise no thread on Sting, Mean Gene and Daniel Bryan, making it into the WON Hall of Fame

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,661
Reputation
-2,898
Daps
84,499
Jack Swagger gets complete silence until he puts his hand on his heart for "We the People". Bryan gets a major pop when his music hits before he even shows up. Swagger is the perfect example of someone who only has a catchphrase over.

I"m not specifically saying Bryan only has a chant, I'm talking mainly about the Yes chant in sporting events and such, I think thats more for the chant than recognizing Daniel Bryan or anything.
 

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,910
Daps
300,354
Reppin
Maryland
Shawn Michaels had crossover fame , just like Kevin Nash despite poor drawing performance in WWE, same for Bret Hart. They were actually crossover stars.

Shawn Michaels is not a recognizable name for non-wrestling fans so he doesn't have much crossover fame. Same for Nash.
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,661
Reputation
-2,898
Daps
84,499
Shawn Michaels is not a recognizable name for non-wrestling fans so he doesn't have much crossover fame. Same for Nash.
I disagree, Shawn micheals is known by non-wrestlers even my grand mother knows him and she doesn't even watch wrestling like that.
Nash is known for movies by some audiences than he is for wrestling, Money Mike stimulus package.
 

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,910
Daps
300,354
Reppin
Maryland
I disagree, Shawn micheals is known by non-wrestlers

In another thread, I mentioned the example of an NFL player using Shawn Michaels' flexing pose after making a sack and no one in the booth knew where the pose came from along with other commentators. Am I supposed to believe that your grandmother knows about Shawn Michaels? :pachaha: He's no household name like Stone Cold, Hogan, Rock, Randy Savage, or even Cena.
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,661
Reputation
-2,898
Daps
84,499
In another thread, I mentioned the example of an NFL player using Shawn Michaels' flexing pose after making a sack and no one in the booth knew where the pose came from along with other commentators. Am I supposed to believe that your grandmother knows about Shawn Michaels? :pachaha: He's no household name like Stone Cold, Hogan, Rock, Randy Savage, or even Cena.

She knows who shawn micheals is, you don't have to believe it.
As for the Shawn Micheals flex and people not knowing it, that might be a younger gen thing, they might not know him like that and its likely since if they are younger wrestling hasn't been shyt in their lifetime.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
125,254
Reputation
8,805
Daps
148,286
Reppin
Westcoast
I don't watch, I'm going off what I read. Its obvious Ryback never caught on for real, he was cut and most of fthe IWC were criticizing the man and calling him worthless. That chant though.

Notice you didn't refute that fact neither.



Vince changed his mind on a character and him being a heel/face.
Stop the presses that means he is a legend.
Ryback was over before,he was buried by Punk and Shield.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
192,256
Reputation
25,078
Daps
621,177
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Here's the issue when people say Sting didn't draw. WCW's business in the early 90s was all fukked up. Despite that, he was still a household name and he was by far the biggest face in the company during the nWo run. I say this before but if Sting isn't Mr. WCW as the face of the company the stable doesn't work as well because they needed someone like Sting to be lurking in the shadows. That person couldn't have been Luger, Giant, DDP, Scott Steiner, etc.. it HAD to be Sting.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
192,256
Reputation
25,078
Daps
621,177
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Well, within the universe of wrestling kayfabe it matters, but like you said it matters as a prop to show strength in a character. People legit forget that. Was JBL a very good worker? fukk no. But as champ he was phenomenal (idgaf) because he got some REAL HEAT and everyone wanted to see him lose the strap. He probably has one 3* match in his entire run. But would Paul london had been a better choice?

See I would disagree with this because I think JBL was a great worker for the style of wrestling he did. He was a brawler and in those matches with Cena and Eddie he held up his own. Meltzer can appreciate all styles but his bread and butter is spot monkey shyt..

My issue with that is there is usually very little story, very little impact to the moves, very little psychology. I get very tired of watching people do flips and nothing else.
 

prophecypro

Hollywood North
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
28,439
Reputation
2,753
Daps
61,129
Reppin
LDN
That was honestly the most irritating shyt, it would be like arguing some average QB on a mediocre team like Jay Cutler is better than Steve Young because he "owned" a team while Young wasn't better than Montana :stopitslime:

And vague bullshyt about how Sting "wasn't a draw" and Meltz had "done the math"... nikka I wouldn't trust your autistic ass to calculate a tip at a restaurant :russ:

Seriously, listening to like Greenfield, Pollack and Bauer on the MLW make the case for Edge over Sting irritated the shyt out of me. Especially considering they were wack Ruthless Aggression era writers who wrote all those bullshyt skits that drove people away from Wrestling and are basically trying to award themselves with Edge :francis:
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
24,376
Reputation
970
Daps
54,928
Reppin
Detroit
Meltzer has driven the narrative that a good work rate = you deserve to be champion

It's just not true. The idea that in 97 Jericho or Eddy or anyone like that was being buried in favor of "lesser" workers is ridiculous. Why the fukk would you give Malenko the belt over fukking Goldberg or Hogan then.

We romanticize the cruiserweights, they got 4.5 stars regularly, yes they are good workers....watch a 97 nitro..they got CDQ outside of a high spot and the finish. Same as now.

The difference is, meltzer rates these matches and people think "they're killing it, make Johnny wrestling champ TODAY" it's crazy.

That's distorting Meltzer's argument nobody said Malenko should have been champ, they said Benoit, Jericho and Guerrero. Jericho and Guerrero were world championship material, they rose to the top in WWE and Dave was vindicated as being correct. Benoit main events did fine in WWE and was hardly out of place. WWF surpassed WCW in the MNW because of new stars, and WCW stars running out of steam. When the NWO ran out of steam, there were the next set of WCW main eventers ready to be elevated, never were, and went to Vince and got that elevation. Which part of that is not fact?
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
24,376
Reputation
970
Daps
54,928
Reppin
Detroit
You would have to take a publication with such a ridiculous award in a creative performance as having some type of credibility to think that means anything.

It would be like having a Oscar category of best technical actor, its absurd, you are either the most effective actor or you aren't, how you get their is irrelevant.

In ring performances are real. Wins and losses arent real. The storylines arent real. Promos are scripted. Bryan's performances in the ring are legitimate though. How could that not be a part of the criteria?
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,661
Reputation
-2,898
Daps
84,499
In ring performances are real. Wins and losses arent real. The storylines arent real. Promos are scripted. Bryan's performances in the ring are legitimate though. How could that not be a part of the criteria?

Ring performance is only real in that it has to achieve the desired effect of getting people invested, other than that its nothing, just a means to an end.
 
Top