IN
The same places being targeted seem to be the same places with shytty foreign policy.You act as if these backwards stone-age mothafukkas haven't been running around butchering each other in the name of their invisible overlord for centuries...That is what they do, kill each other over petty ass tribal shyt inspired by their religion...
Where the west fukked up is getting involved in their business due to oil greed...I agree with you, a lot of this shyt the west brought on themselves but that doesn't mean they have to lay down and allow these animals to live in their countries and attack like this...
At some point you have to say enough is enough...
The UK has reached that point...

You seem to care more about daps and reps then people getting blown up or mowed down
Dapped you btw

You act as if these backwards stone-age mothafukkas haven't been running around butchering each other in the name of their invisible overlord for centuries...That is what they do, kill each other over petty ass tribal shyt inspired by their religion...
Where the west fukked up is getting involved in their business due to oil greed...I agree with you, a lot of this shyt the west brought on themselves but that doesn't mean they have to lay down and allow these animals to live in their countries and attack like this...
At some point you have to say enough is enough...
The UK has reached that point...
The same places being targeted seem to be the same places with shytty foreign policy.![]()

How about a failed foreign policy that supported "rebels" to overthrow governments and the same rebels were living in your country for years? A failed foreign policy that destroyed the Iraqi state?
Or accepting said rebels as asylum seekers?
Blame your government before you blame religion. This is the result of FAILED foreign policy decisions. Just like the blowback with supporting the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, the same blowback is happening with countries becoming failed states.
And being in bed with the SAUDIS doesn't help.
How about a failed foreign policy that supported "rebels" to overthrow governments and the same rebels were living in your country for years? A failed foreign policy that destroyed the Iraqi state?
Or accepting said rebels as asylum seekers?
Blame your government before you blame religion. This is the result of FAILED foreign policy decisions. Just like the blowback with supporting the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, the same blowback is happening with countries becoming failed states.
And being in bed with the SAUDIS doesn't help.
" You have to renounce membership at that point or you become part of the problem.You all know my position or at least I've stated throughout Various threads. So this may come as a surprise coming from me.I wonder why they aren't bombing Peru?
"Bin Laden didn't blow up the projects" - Immortal Technique
You all know my position or at least I've stated throughout Various threads. So this may come as a surprise coming from me.
But if you're going to destabilize governments, arm and promise rebels their own states (which fails), accept those rebels as refugees, train them to be terrorists (I acknowledge we don't call them terrorists when they're serving our interest) you're going to have these types of attacks.
Blaming it on Islam is lazy.
all around. Sorry for the loss of life though.I agree on one thing, this is politics...No. Tribalism existed before Islam and other religions. The ideology of the Saudis has been proliferated for 40 years due to oil money.
Hell, even before 9/11 and the Iraq War there wasn't as many terrorist attacks. The militarization and destruction of states in the Middle East brought up a lot of this shid.
This is politics. You can hate my religion all you want but its been around for 1400 years. The world has gone through numerous events. The deadliest event in human event of the 20th century was WW2.
Muslim terrorists targetting Western targets has been a what? 20 year phenomena? I'm not counting the colonial era obviously.
Poor attempt at reverse psychology![]()
Both are too blame. Why we even talk to anyone over there much less have people over there is beyond me.
But religion is a voluntary association so there needs to be wider accountability for these attacks. You can't be a part of a club and when people in your club go out and murder others in the name of your club just be like "well it wasn't me" You have to renounce membership at that point or you become part of the problem.
Otherwise, what you're saying is "it's ok to be in the Klan, as long as you don't lynch anyone." No. It's guilty by association.
There's no way religion deserves the same deference as say race does. One is voluntary and one isn't. One is merely aesthetics while the other one is actions and a belief system. The founding fathers got it flipped when they put religion in the 1st amendment but not race. But now the "tolerant" west is messing with something that doesn't play by our rules of combat or morals. The war against it can't be fought with 1942 "we're going to take their capital" tactics because there is no capital. We need policy shifts on foreign policy and how we treat religion.
You always resort to ad hominem attacks about race so there's no point in engaging with you in a proper manner.
