Conservative writer: God was ‘answering prayers’ of Texas victims by letting them get shot
Hans Fiene, a Lutheran pastor who is also a regular contributor to the right-wing website The Federalist, has written a new column in which he explains that allowing 26 people to die at the hands of a crazed gunman at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, this weekend was actually God’s way of answering their prayers.
Fiene begins his column by attacking liberals who have mocked Republican politicians who only offer “thoughts and prayers” for shooting victims — and who don’t take any direct action that could prevent future shootings.
He then explains to liberals that it was part of God’s plan that over two dozen people would get shot up while in their own house of worship.
“It may seem, on the surface, that God was refusing to give such protection to his Texan children,” he writes. “But we are also praying that God would deliver us from evil eternally. Through these same words, we are asking God to deliver us out of this evil world and into his heavenly glory, where no violence, persecution, cruelty, or hatred will ever afflict us again.”
Fiene then says that, in order to fully defeat evil eternally, God has to let evil get some temporary victories, such as this weekend’s mass shooting.
“So when a madman with a rifle sought to persecute the faithful at First Baptist Church on Sunday morning, he failed,” Fiene says. “Just like those who put Christ to death, and just like those who have brought violence to believers in every generation, this man only succeeded in being the means through which God delivered his children from this evil world into an eternity of righteousness and peace.”
Conservative writer: God was ‘answering prayers’ of Texas victims by letting them get shot
None of the regulations presented would have prevented the incident they were proposed in response to.You asked this same question when the Vegas shooting happened and we provided multiple links detailing suggestions. I also explained that the worst option is doing nothing, which happens to be the status quo of your side.
I feel like you do this every time a shooting happens. A simple google search would save a lot of your questions.
How about auditing our background system to see how the AF failed to report and to see if there are any checks and balances (signals/kanbans) that are in place to ensure the accuracy of data in the background check. Image if it is discovered there hundreds of people with violent records owning guns.
America will never admit the 2nd amendment may eventually destroy us.
I know what you're asking, it just seems like another disingenuous question. You're trying to say that gun control is pointless because this guy still obtained a gun when he should have been banned from having one, but that's not how it works.None of the regulations presented would have prevented the incident they were proposed in response to.
I'm asking for a specific regulation in this case that would have prevented this
@NY's #1 Draft Pick How exactly is that trolling?
It isnt pointless, and we havent done "nothing"... We have regulations in place that do check mental health. Those regulations just failed in this instance because someone didnt do their job...I know what you're asking, it just seems like another disingenuous question. You're trying to say that gun control is pointless because this guy still obtained a gun when he should have been banned from having one, but that's not how it works.
No solution is perfect, but only one side uses that to argue against doing anything at all. Reducing the number of guns and making it harder to obtain them will logically lead to less guns available to unstable people. Which then leads to less gun deaths overall.
It's that simple but we know people will always slip through the cracks. That's not a good enough reason to just throw your hands up and do nothing.
i got fukking railroaded in the air force on some stupid shyt, while i got an honorable discharge, the LOR i eat was straight bullshyt, and dudes i knew, nikkas i served with in wartime got handed harsher sentences for weaker shyt in retrospect then this bytch ass nikka for breaking his baby skull. i guess being black or latino just adds years no matter where you at in america
I served and can say with 100% certainty you fukked up badly somewhere in there.
As I said, this guy slipping through the cracks doesn't do anything to argue against gun control.It isnt pointless, and we havent done "nothing"... We have regulations in place that do check mental health. Those regulations just failed in this instance because someone didnt do their job...Adding more gun control because someone didnt do their job instead of holding that person/organization accountable seems like anti gun bullshyt to me.
![]()