Supreme365
Superstar
The Celtics should win regardless of that defense.
Hell nah that d was the strength of that team
The Celtics should win regardless of that defense.
They win sooner. KG was fukking ridiculous during his prime.Mavericks dont win in 2011 with KG instead of Dirk....
Kg was the anchor of that d and the most important piece I don't see the C's winning a chip with dirk in his place
The Mavs are worse off in pretty much any scenario.
Dirk is a much better #1 scoring option and it should have 2 championships to his credit.
The Wolves? They probably fair better because you already have your scoring option and all he would need around him is defensive stoppers to thrive.
KG was the more versatile player, but an all time great and efficient scorer like Dirk outweighs all that versatility. We have already been down this road several years ago.
It's as simple as Dirk being a legit #1 scorer and KG was good, but not on that level.
Didn't they go 7 with Atlanta the year they won the chip?![]()
2006 mavs wouldn't of got to the finals with kg2006 mavs assuredly beat Miami
SWAP KG FOR DUNCAN AND EVERYBODYS TOP 5 changes.
PUT KG IN POPS SYSTEM SHIIIIIT
'2011 Mavs with KG dont beat Miami
![]()
Hell nah that d was the strength of that team
Those teams didn't lack scoring. Their scoring was top heavy.The Wolves? They probably fair better because you already have your scoring option and all he would need around him is defensive stoppers to thrive.
And vice versa
Spurs would've been worse with KG.
They both get rings.
KG with Nash and Finley
Dirk with Pierce and Allen
Edit:I can kinda tell the youth of some of you guys posting here(and this is coming from a 27 year old). There's no you truly saw and understood Garnett's greatness pre-Boston. The man was 25, 14 and 5 nightly while being the best defensive player in the NBA.
Please don't diminish the mans legacy because he was playing with garbage in Minnesota.