T.I. Expeditiously Goes To The Gynecologist Every Year With Daughter To Ensure Her Hymen there

[number21]

All I can say...Im praying for no daughters.

 

[number21]

This type of thing was pretty normal up until like 150 years ago

now people just let they daughters be thots and don't even try

This.

 

[Apollo Creed]

You can't stop grown women from having sex. TI is acting like a Blue Pill beta simp. Why not get a chastity belt?

Face the facts Clifford.. your daughter is going to have penis's inside her.
All you can do is raise them the best you can and hope they make good decisions about who she chooses to date etc.

Grown? I thought she was a minor still?

 

[DPresidential]

This type of thing was pretty normal up until like 150 years ago

now people just let they daughters be thots and don't even try

nikka, 150 years ago black Africans were chattel slavery and those in royalty literally prostituted their daughters in exchange for truces and resources on some property shyt.

Are you saying that the only other alternative than using this 150 year old strategy is encouraging one's child to be sexually promiscuous?

 

[Swagnificent]

See...


Now I know you are trolling and aren't serious.

It makes me feel a little better about the society we live in to know that you probably don't seriously think like this.

My man said this will all show itself to be rewarding when she marries a rich African prince.

nikkas living in Zamunda now.

Brehs in here are inches away from saying they condone clitoral removal for the betterment of a young woman's life because the removal of pleasure will help her stay faithful and not distracted by temptation.


fukking spooky as fukk.

I mentioned the part of the African prince cause Africans value virginity more than folks over here cause they haven't been corrupted by demonic white values.

T.I. saying his beautiful 18 year old daughter is still a virgin just made her one of the most desirable women on earth. Lots of high status men will now be pursuing her as a wife. She checks every box for them.

 

[Swagnificent]

Actually the pre feminism/welfare intact cookie cutter nuclear black family is a myth. African-Americans have always had a higher rate of single motherhood and woman headed households than whites since they've started collecting data. Our community has always relied on communalism.

We have always adapted and resorted largely to communalism keep ourselves together and afloat in this hostile, volatile, society, because being a community of cookie cutter nuclear families hasn't been been an opinion for us and isn't apart of our culture. Extended families, organizations, community centers, teachers, clerics, and masjid/church members, aunts, uncles, older siblings, and cousins etc etc have always stepped in where "mom and dad" couldn't when it came to rearing children and instilling values. This didn't start with the introduction of government welfare in the late 60s and early 70. Black fathers were being lynched, imprisoned, and driven out of town since we've been free people., and were sold away in the domestic slave trade in the antebellum era. But yet some people think problems within our community started with the "breakdown" of the nuclear family in the late 60s and early 70s.

This myth largely originates with a white man, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who put forth the "Moynihan theory" which was obviously providing an analysis of our community through the lense of how things function in his community which led to a flawed analysis. In actuality since at least the 1880s African-Americans have had a higher rate of single parent hood than white americans.



Full report on the origins of the AA family structure.
http://users.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Articles/Af-Am-fam.pdf

Facts > Rhetoric

And furthermore you confusing being more spiritual and superstitious with being religious zealots. AAs have been and still are more spiritual than whites and more likely to faithfully attend religious ceremonies, but that is in part because these religious institutions play a much more intergral parts of our lives than it did for white people. It was a place for our community to congregate, network, organize, plan, socialize, galvanize, crowd fund, educated among many other things. In fact the first black schools including the first HBCU came from the black church. So, our people weren't just in the church to praise jesus. We have never been zealots in our religiosity like white people. There's no AADOS version of the westboro baptist church.

Also I'm willing to do a mod verification of my race any time where @Barnett114 or someone can verify my race. Are you?

You posting white lies. Same sources also will tell you the Ancient Egyptians weren't black.

I know from my own family tree what you posted is a lie. Black folks have always been socially conservative. Girls in the past would hide pregnancies cause they knew premarital sex was unacceptable. I had grandmothers who were married at a young age cause they got pregnant and that's what folks did back then cause being an unwed mother was looked down upon.

Stop trying to spread white liberal falsehoods.

 

[Threnody]

nikka, 150 years ago black Africans were chattel slavery and those in royalty literally prostituted their daughters in exchange for truces and resources on some property shyt.

Are you saying that the only other alternative than using this 150 year old strategy is encouraging one's child to be sexually promiscuous?

lol@ this selective history ass nikka....maybe I'm not speaking on slaves or royalty

Throwing around generalizations off some baseless assumptions you made off misunderstanding my statement

you could have kept this dumb shyt yo yaself don't quote me again

 

[Maximus]

her poor throat.. tonsils probably half-way to her stomach at this point..

What is with you faq pervs and your need to turn this girl into a thot?

This about the fourth post I've read where dudes are concocting scenarios of her being throat fukked and fukked in the booty. Is the idea of a virgin teen girl that offensive to you? You're disgusting.

 

[Maximus]

Actually the pre feminism/welfare intact cookie cutter nuclear black family is a myth. African-Americans have always had a higher rate of single motherhood and woman headed households than whites since they've started collecting data. Our community has always relied on communalism.

We have always adapted and resorted largely to communalism keep ourselves together and afloat in this hostile, volatile, society, because being a community of cookie cutter nuclear families hasn't been been an opinion for us and isn't apart of our culture. Extended families, organizations, community centers, teachers, clerics, and masjid/church members, aunts, uncles, older siblings, and cousins etc etc have always stepped in where "mom and dad" couldn't when it came to rearing children and instilling values. This didn't start with the introduction of government welfare in the late 60s and early 70. Black fathers were being lynched, imprisoned, and driven out of town since we've been free people., and were sold away in the domestic slave trade in the antebellum era. But yet some people think problems within our community started with the "breakdown" of the nuclear family in the late 60s and early 70s.

This myth largely originates with a white man, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who put forth the "Moynihan theory" which was obviously providing an analysis of our community through the lense of how things function in his community which led to a flawed analysis. In actuality since at least the 1880s African-Americans have had a higher rate of single parent hood than white americans.



Full report on the origins of the AA family structure.
http://users.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Articles/Af-Am-fam.pdf

Facts > Rhetoric

And furthermore you confusing being more spiritual and superstitious with being religious zealots. AAs have been and still are more spiritual than whites and more likely to faithfully attend religious ceremonies, but that is in part because these religious institutions play a much more intergral parts of our lives than it did for white people. It was a place for our community to congregate, network, organize, plan, socialize, galvanize, crowd fund, educated among many other things. In fact the first black schools including the first HBCU came from the black church. So, our people weren't just in the church to praise jesus. We have never been zealots in our religiosity like white people. There's no AADOS version of the westboro baptist church.

Also I'm willing to do a mod verification of my race any time where @Barnett114 or someone can verify my race. Are you?

These stats are irrelevant without posting the out of wedlock birthrates over that near century-long period.

And I'm pretty sure why you didn't post it....

 

[MeachTheMonster]

What is with you faq pervs and your need to turn this girl into a thot?

This about the fourth post I've read where dudes are concocting scenarios of her being throat fukked and fukked in the booty. Is the idea of a virgin teen girl that offensive to you? You're disgusting.

According to @Swagnificent this is the desired effect of T.I. Parenting strategy and subsequent comments.

 

[Rell Lauren]

 

[AllHolosEve]

That's not what your first post said. You said you aren't as protective to your boys because they can't get pregnant.

At the very least a woman has a right to choose whether she wants to keep the baby or not. As a male, once the deed is done their at the mercy of the woman or women. 9 months really doesn't compare to a lifetime of a child you had no say so in creating.

I get what you are saying now but you're first post implied something different.

I don't like police or judges. When they asked that was my answer.

I believe in "Legacy" & women are intergral to that because they literally produce our future generations. I believe in protecting them, especially from dumbass broke brehs that won't treat them right. I grew up seeing abusive relationship shyt, I don't want my daughter anywhere near it. There are no worthless mothers around me & I don't want her with dudes like my deadbeat brothers. My daughter would never take part in some #slutwalk bullshyt.

I don't give my boys special treatment. I'm just not as defensive cause they have to grow up & be defenders. They aren't as vulnerable cause they don't carry the child. My daughter literally has our bloodline growing within her 9 months & I expect my boys to be willing to die over her protection.

 

[Benefited]

So many things wrong with this. Firstly, we're not going to sit here and act like we don't live in the US in the 21st century where there are atleast 15 different types of birth control which gives her fully control of her reproductivity separate from having even unprotected sex. Secondly, I can think of MANY worse thing that can happen to my daughter than being a pregnant single mother(which again will be her choice/responsibility). She has full control of how and when she get pregnant if she chooses to, so there's no way for her to be trapped into her own pregnancy. So, no, her (consensual)sex life is certainly not the most important aspect of her life, if she doesn't want it to be just because you mistakenly THINK it should be.

And, no, I'm not going to be a creep and monitor what she does with her vagina, because my relationship with her isn't centered around that.

Furthermore, you keep calling people you call out your lunacy cacs when in actuality this sexual purity shyt you and ti do is more inline with judeo-christian conservative cacs than our culture. We AADOS have NEVER been a socially conservative people relative to whites. We've always shown to be more sexually liberal ever since our marriages and births were counted in the census all the way in the 19th century had a higher rate of single motherhood and OOW births. We've always relied on communalism as the fabric that binds our community together, not social conservatism. What you're proposing is alien to our culture.

You are one sick puppy talking like this

 

[Maximus]

How do you know she’s a virgin?


In postpubertal women, or at the beginning of their sexual life, the hymen may stretch, allowing vaginal penetration with minimal or no injury. Only a small portion of these women will exhibit changes in the hymen indicative of penetrating trauma. For example, in one small study of 36 pregnant adolescent girls, medical staff were only able to make definitive findings of penetration in two cases [27].

Another study comparing hymenal morphology in adolescent girls with and without a history of consensual sexual intercourse found that 52% of those who admitted to having had prior intercourse, had no identifiable changes to the hymenal tissue [28].

The little tissue that couldn’t – dispelling myths about the Hymen’s role in determining sexual history and assault

Okay fine. Let me ask a question to all the non-virgin females posting here: Do any of you still have your hymens?

On one hand, many of you are arguing that the hymen is so fragile that doing the most mundane physical activities can break it -- from riding a bicycle or a horse, to jumping up too high, to slipping on a banana peel, to bending down to pick something up, to the wind blowing too hard. I mean anything little thing can break that little hymen, eh?

On another hand, you're posting tweets from planned parenthood and "small"(flawed) studies that claim non-virgin girls can still have their hymens. On one hand it's apparently so fragile that anything can tear it; on the other hand, it can withstand the force of a penetrating dikk. Fine, I'll suspend my common sense long enough to entertain both theories.

How many of you still have your hymens intact? And if they're not intact, did you lose them doing one of the aforementioned physical activities or during vaginal intercourse?

 

[8WON6]

i can't believe this story took off like this.