T.I. Expeditiously Goes To The Gynecologist Every Year With Daughter To Ensure Her Hymen there

[MeachTheMonster]

Okay fine. Let me ask a question to all the non-virgin females posting here: Do any of you still have your hymens?

On one hand, many of you are arguing that the hymen is so fragile that doing the most mundane physical activities can break it -- from riding a bicycle or a horse, to jumping up too high, to slipping on a banana peel, to bending down to pick something up, to the wind blowing too hard. I mean anything little thing can break that little hymen, eh?

On another hand, you're posting tweets from planned parenthood and "small"(flawed) studies that claim non-virgin girls can still have their hymens. On one hand it's apparently so fragile that anything can tear it; on the other hand, it can withstand the force of a penetrating dikk. Fine, I'll suspend my common sense long enough to entertain both theories.

How many of you still have your hymens intact? And if they're not intact, did you lose them doing one of the aforementioned physical activities or during vaginal intercourse?

Don’t understand biology brehs

 

[AllHolosEve]

Yeah, they are if you raised them with any kinda sense.

A pregnancy isn’t just one sided.

I meant 9 months physically. They don't carry the child or have the same health risks. My daughter had a risky pregnancy for her & the baby. My sons will never know how that feels.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I meant 9 months physically. They don't carry the child or have the same health risks. My daughter had a risky pregnancy for her & the baby. My sons will never know how that feels.

Sure but they are affected in other ways. The mother of their child or the child itself gets sick, that’s a big burden on the father. Even if they don’t get sick the father is still at least half responsible for the child’s wellbeing and by proxy the mothers during pregnancy.

 

[Maximus]

Don’t understand biology brehs

I'm being facetious, fakkit.

 

[DragonKnight]

 

[AllHolosEve]

Sure but they are affected in other ways. The mother of their child or the child itself gets sick, that’s a big burden on the father. Even if they don’t get sick the father is still at least half responsible for the child’s wellbeing and by proxy the mothers during pregnancy.

Again, I meant physically. We can get tested emotionally. I have 4 kids so I know what you mean, I'm just taking her physically. I was stressed the fukk out & always there for my BM. I couldn't feel her pain though.

 

[Swagnificent]

I don't like police or judges. When they asked that was my answer.

I believe in "Legacy" & women are intergral to that because they literally produce our future generations. I believe in protecting them, especially from dumbass broke brehs that won't treat them right. I grew up seeing abusive relationship shyt, I don't want my daughter anywhere near it. There are no worthless mothers around me & I don't want her with dudes like my deadbeat brothers. My daughter would never take part in some #slutwalk bullshyt.

I don't give my boys special treatment. I'm just not as defensive cause they have to grow up & be defenders. They aren't as vulnerable cause they don't carry the child. My daughter literally has our bloodline growing within her 9 months & I expect my boys to be willing to die over her protection.

That's good parenting.

Don't let these psychos trying to destroy the black family tell you otherwise.

 

[Supper]

These stats are irrelevant without posting the out of wedlock birthrates over that near century-long period.

And I'm pretty sure why you didn't post it....

Whether you're talking about OOW births, single parents housesholds, woman-headed households. It's abundantly clear that African-Americans have always had a significantly higher rates than whites. Again, cookie cutter nuclear families were never our culture like it was(kind still is) for whites.

Although it is clear that the ratios for blacks were consistently higher than those for whites between 1917 and 1965, the table also shows a steeper increase in illegitimacy ratios for whites than for blacks. More specifically, the black ratio in 1965 was about twice what it was in 1917, and the white ratio in 1965 was three times the 1917 figure. The population of the United States has merely doubled between 1917 and 1965

https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/...sue-02/48-2-part-2-Illegitimacy-and-Race.pdf\

Lotta you neo cons keep trying to paint this picture of a mythical past where black men and women got married as virgins, stayed together forever, and never had chidlren out of wedlock that just never existed in reality. If your going to propose that as a better alternative then fine, we can have that debate. But, don't try to distort history to make the case for it.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

I don't like police or judges. When they asked that was my answer.

I believe in "Legacy" & women are intergral to that because they literally produce our future generations. I believe in protecting them, especially from dumbass broke brehs that won't treat them right. I grew up seeing abusive relationship shyt, I don't want my daughter anywhere near it. There are no worthless mothers around me & I don't want her with dudes like my deadbeat brothers. My daughter would never take part in some #slutwalk bullshyt.

I don't give my boys special treatment. I'm just not as defensive cause they have to grow up & be defenders. They aren't as vulnerable cause they don't carry the child. My daughter literally has our bloodline growing within her 9 months & I expect my boys to be willing to die over her protection.

The first post says you aren't as protective. The second says you are. This post says you aren't. It really doesn't matter to me. You don't need to keep explaining but you're kinda all over the place.

My point was that a man is equally in a vulnerable when it comes to choice and financially responsiblity. You don't need to explain your parenting to me. I was only making my point.

 

[Luken]

Why is this topic 14 pages long?

 

[Supper]

Lotta you neo cons keep trying to paint this picture of a mythical past where black men and women got married as virgins, stayed together forever, and never had chidlren out of wedlock that just never existed in reality. If your going to propose that as a better alternative then fine, we can have that debate. But, don't try to distort history to make the case for it.

^^^^ Again, This never existed.

http://users.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Articles/Af-Am-fam.pdf

Table 1.

 

[AllHolosEve]

The first post says you aren't as protective. The second says you are. This post says you aren't. It really doesn't matter to me. You don't need to keep explaining but you're kinda all over the place.

My point was that a man is equally in a vulnerable when it comes to choice and financially responsiblity. You don't need to explain your parenting to me. I was only making my point.

Cool. I teach them the same thing. I don't play favorites but let's be real. Men & women typically have different expectations & I'm not gonna lie & act like I didn't raise my daughter a little different from her brothers.

I'm protective of my boys too, just not as much as my daughter according to the court. Don't know how you don't understand, I'm protective of all my kids. This thread is about a daughter so I was going with the thread. My boys came up after. I just told you what I meant.

Edit: we just talking, it's good. Just wanted to make sure you know what I'm saying. We got no problems.

 

[Money Be Green]

 

[Supper]

You are one sick puppy talking like this

This coming from the resident admitted coli rapist only serves to prove my point about dudes with your line of thinking.

 

[Supper]

You posting white lies. Same sources also will tell you the Ancient Egyptians weren't black.

I know from my own family tree what you posted is a lie. Black folks have always been socially conservative. Girls in the past would hide pregnancies cause they knew premarital sex was unacceptable. I had grandmothers who were married at a young age cause they got pregnant and that's what folks did back then cause being an unwed mother was looked down upon.

Stop trying to spread white liberal falsehoods.

Either, your situation is represents one of the few exceptions, you're lying, or someone lied to you.

What you're saying is not only factually incorrect. It's ahistorical.

Web Dubois who was a proponent of a judeo christian western nuclear family structure all the way back in 1908 remarked on the "fractured negro family" in the US and even tried to link it back to our "african past" of polygamy as to why we didn't have strong marriages.
Sociation Today Spring 2009, Volume 7, Number 1
AFRICAN AND AFRO-AMERICAN FAMILY STRUCTURE: A COMPARISON on JSTOR

But, I guess you, a layman today, knows more about the black family structure of the past than a black scholar who actually lived during that time.