
U can keep referring to your Marxist books but all real world experience with communism points to disaster and an eventual transition into some level of capitalism anyway.OK, u got me there, doesnt change the fact that u have no proof communism/socialism will work, nor can you counter the fact that capitalism, not communism, has been instrumental in lifting billions of people out of poverty.
Just because the US has problems doesnt mean the only solution is communism, miss me with this sophmoric fatalism. There are plenty of countries that are far from communist that still keep capitalists in check, and have thrived for centuries
Never mind the fact that the collapse of communist countries birthed cronyist capitalists that would make the Koch bros![]()
U can keep referring to your Marxist books but all real world experience with communism points to disaster and an eventual transition into some level of capitalism anyway.
Rampant ahistoricalism is maybe this forums biggest issue.

nikkas continue to parrot the same debunked nonsense![]()
The rate of failure/wrongful fills on prescription would be much lower with a computer than a human.

I believe the only real solution to this problem is a system that abolishes the myth of private property

Enlighten us, what exactly is communism?
Indeed, if only the kapitalists could get out of the way so we could sacrifice ourselves like the other 100 million people kommunism killed
We mite have to make a new rule excluding college students from discussions. Yall nikkas live out of textbooks
the happiest people in the world live in societies that are more socialist than capitalist. americans? we typically rank around number ten. that's an epic failure for an economic system that your type alleges is the bestHow do u see your left wing fantasy playing out any different than China or the USSR?
U dont agree with me at allAgain, just skip over the whole "I agree with you" thing. Socialism needs capitalism to precede it. Something no country that's made genuine attempts to socialize has had. And frankly would be totally useless even if it had. Because socialism in one nation is destined to failure.
Capitalism produces its own downfall. An exploited vast majority that's increasingly made irrelevant and expendable via population growth, globalization, and mechanization. I believe the only real solution to this problem is a system that abolishes the myth of private property and allows all of mankind to live off the fat of our collective ancestral and present efforts to progress to an easier, more peaceful, and longer life.
Now I readily admit that this society may be far off. Or perhaps totally farcical. I may be wrong in my reading of the situation. I don't think so however.
The fall of the USSR is an extremely complicated subject. Most of that crony capitalism you speak of came from nominal Communists who were tired of getting a fraction of the pay they would in a capitalistic country for their positions(heads of huge soviet factories made ~4x what their workers made, compared to the hundreds of times that American counterparts made). Very interesting subject.
For starters things are not as binary as you make them. I don't think communism OR capitalism or ANY "-ism" in isolation is a viable economic solution. Why? Because they are just ideas; they haven't been vetted or adjusted to actually work in reality.
Would communism take people's private property by force? What does anyone with private property stand to gain from agreeing to such an arrangement? You would have an instant civil war.Show me where I said capitalism or America's economic system (which is NOT capitalism by the way) are "the best".the happiest people in the world live in societies that are more socialist than capitalist. americans? we typically rank around number ten. that's an epic failure for an economic system that your type alleges is the best
This sadly is the goal of many capitalistsThe only way to get rid of human error is to completely get rid of humans.